Mushak P
Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina, Durham 27705.
Environ Res. 1992 Dec;59(2):281-309. doi: 10.1016/s0013-9351(05)80036-2.
The principal environmental health issue for American children is pervasive lead poisoning from the many decades of lead contamination. Available scientific evidence cementing lead's premiere ranking is voluminous, multifaceted, and compelling. This evidence, however, requires organization into a clear and coherent body of science before it can be fully recognized or comprehended by either the scientific community or the general public and its representatives: public health officials, regulators, policy makers, and legislators. An attempt at such organization is presented and begins with the premise that there exist clear, objective criteria by which a premiere environmental health issue can be defined. A second premise is that these criteria sort themselves into three categories which cover the full spectrum of toxic contaminant-population relationships. They are: (1) economic and sociopolitical, (2) scientific and public health, and (3) societal risk assessment criteria. The first set of criteria includes economic and historical centrality, primacy of economic over public health considerations, a relatively narrow decision-making framework, and controlled flow of information on the toxicant, especially its negative impacts. The second set of criteria is also orthodox in scope: the toxicant should be indestructible, should accumulate in both the environment and the body, and should be a multimedia contaminant; it should produce toxicity in numerous organs with little impediment; toxicity should be produced with low/no threshold in huge numbers of the most vulnerable; and finally, effects should persist in the critical target organ(s). There is a third, more globally encompassing, set of criteria important for present-day requirements for risk assessment; e.g., the contaminant should produce full-spectrum population-wide as well as individual toxicity. Evidence for societal harm should be compelling. It should typify the increasing importance of the elements of preventive over clinical medicine and the substance should bring to bear the cost-benefit analysis of macro plus micro health risk. Lead exposure and toxicity is conclusively shown to meet ALL of these criteria and is the premiere environmental health threat to America's children.
美国儿童面临的主要环境卫生问题是几十年来铅污染导致的普遍铅中毒。大量、多方面且具有说服力的现有科学证据巩固了铅的首要地位。然而,在科学界、公众及其代表(公共卫生官员、监管机构、政策制定者和立法者)能够充分认识或理解这些证据之前,需要将其整理成清晰连贯的科学体系。本文进行了这样的整理尝试,首先假定存在明确、客观的标准来界定首要环境卫生问题。第二个假定是,这些标准可分为三类,涵盖有毒污染物与人群关系的全谱。它们是:(1)经济和社会政治标准,(2)科学和公共卫生标准,(3)社会风险评估标准。第一组标准包括经济和历史中心地位、经济考量优先于公共卫生考量、相对狭窄的决策框架以及关于有毒物质的信息(尤其是其负面影响)的受控流动。第二组标准在范围上也是正统的:有毒物质应不可降解,应在环境和人体中积累,应是一种多介质污染物;它应能在众多器官中产生毒性且几乎不受阻碍;应在大量最易受影响的人群中以低/无阈值产生毒性;最后,影响应在关键靶器官中持续存在。对于当今的风险评估要求,还有第三组更具全球包容性的标准;例如,污染物应在全人群范围内以及个体层面产生全面的毒性。社会危害的证据应具有说服力。它应体现预防医学要素相对于临床医学日益增加的重要性,并且该物质应进行宏观和微观健康风险的成本效益分析。铅暴露和毒性已确凿表明符合所有这些标准,是对美国儿童的首要环境卫生威胁。