• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在澳大利亚分诊量表应用于儿科急诊科就诊情况方面存在较差的一致性。

Poor agreement in application of the Australasian Triage Scale to paediatric emergency department presentations.

作者信息

Crellin Dianne J, Johnston Linda

机构信息

The School of Nursing, The University of Melbourne, and Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne.

出版信息

Contemp Nurse. 2003 Aug;15(1-2):48-60. doi: 10.5172/conu.15.1-2.48.

DOI:10.5172/conu.15.1-2.48
PMID:14649508
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) is used in Australian emergency departments (ED) to describe patient priority on arrival. This study aimed to determine the level of inter-rater consistency with which the scale is applied to paediatric presentations. Additionally, it sought to document the level of certainty with which nurses apply the scale.

METHOD

An anonymous survey of emergency nurses responsible for paediatric triage decisions using written patient profiles.

RESULTS

The level of agreement between nurses applying the ATS to paediatric presentations can be described as poor and appears lower than the consistency with which it is applied to adult presentations.

CONCLUSION

Inconsistent allocation of ATS category implies variable patient waiting times, which may have detrimental effects on patient condition. Hence, efforts must be made to address the inconsistency that exists in paediatric triage decision-making.

摘要

背景

澳大利亚分诊量表(ATS)用于澳大利亚急诊科描述患者到达时的优先级别。本研究旨在确定该量表应用于儿科患者时评估者间的一致性水平。此外,研究还试图记录护士应用该量表时的确定程度。

方法

对负责使用书面患者资料进行儿科分诊决策的急诊护士进行匿名调查。

结果

护士将ATS应用于儿科患者时的一致性水平较差,且似乎低于应用于成人患者时的一致性。

结论

ATS分类的不一致意味着患者等待时间不同,这可能对患者病情产生不利影响。因此,必须努力解决儿科分诊决策中存在的不一致问题。

相似文献

1
Poor agreement in application of the Australasian Triage Scale to paediatric emergency department presentations.在澳大利亚分诊量表应用于儿科急诊科就诊情况方面存在较差的一致性。
Contemp Nurse. 2003 Aug;15(1-2):48-60. doi: 10.5172/conu.15.1-2.48.
2
Triage nurses' decisions using the National Triage Scale for Australian emergency departments.分诊护士使用澳大利亚急诊科国家分诊量表进行的决策。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2000 Oct;8(4):201-9. doi: 10.1054/aaen.2000.0166.
3
Developing a triage tool for paediatric care.开发一种用于儿科护理的分诊工具。
Emerg Nurse. 2009 Jun;17(3):12-7. doi: 10.7748/en2009.06.17.3.12.c7087.
4
Australian triage nurses' decision-making and scope of practice.澳大利亚分诊护士的决策制定与执业范围。
Aust J Adv Nurs. 2000 Sep-Nov;18(1):24-33.
5
Reliability and validity of the Toowoomba adult trauma triage tool: a Queensland, Australia study.图文巴成人创伤分诊工具的可靠性与有效性:澳大利亚昆士兰的一项研究
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2004 Oct;12(4):230-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2004.07.003.
6
Explicating nurses' cardiac triage decisions.解读护士的心脏分诊决策。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):50-7. doi: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000317474.50424.4f.
7
Inter-rater reliability in the Paediatric Observation Priority Score (POPS).儿科观察优先级评分(POPS)的组内可靠性。
Arch Dis Child. 2018 May;103(5):458-462. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314165. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
8
A study of triage of paediatric patients in Australia.澳大利亚儿科患者分诊研究。
Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2002 Mar;14(1):67-76. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2026.2002.00261.x.
9
Deliberate self-harm: emergency department nurses' attitudes, triage and care intentions.蓄意自伤:急诊科护士的态度、分诊及护理意愿
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Sep;16(9):1704-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01555.x. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
10
Use of a paediatric early warning system in emergency departments.儿科早期预警系统在急诊科的应用。
Emerg Nurse. 2009 Apr;17(1):22-5. doi: 10.7748/en2009.04.17.1.22.c6984.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Pediatric Triage Systems Reliable in the Emergency Department?儿科分诊系统在急诊科是否可靠?
Emerg Med Int. 2020 Jul 10;2020:9825730. doi: 10.1155/2020/9825730. eCollection 2020.
2
VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF A NEW TRIAGE SYSTEM FOR PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE: CLARIPED.一种用于儿科急诊护理的新分诊系统CLARIPED的有效性和可靠性
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2018 Oct-Dec;36(4):398-406. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2018;36;4;00017.
3
Implementation of a Pediatric Emergency Triage System in Xiamen, China.中国厦门儿科急诊分诊系统的实施
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Oct 20;129(20):2416-2421. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.191755.
4
The reliability of the Australasian Triage Scale: a meta-analysis.澳大利亚分诊量表的可靠性:一项荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Med. 2015;6(2):94-9. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.02.002.
5
Reliability and validity of triage systems in paediatric emergency care.儿科急诊分诊系统的可靠性和有效性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009 Aug 27;17:38. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-38.