• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科急诊分诊系统的可靠性和有效性。

Reliability and validity of triage systems in paediatric emergency care.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009 Aug 27;17:38. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-38.

DOI:10.1186/1757-7241-17-38
PMID:19712467
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2747834/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Triage in paediatric emergency care is an important tool to prioritize seriously ill children. Triage can also be used to identify patients who do not need urgent care and who can safely wait. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the literature on reliability and validity of current triage systems in paediatric emergency care

METHODS

We performed a search in Pubmed and Cochrane on studies on reliability and validity of triage systems in children

RESULTS

The Manchester Triage System (MTS), the Emergency Severity Index (ESI), the Paediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Score (paedCTAS) and the Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) are common used triage systems and contain specific parts for children. The reliability of the MTS is good and reliability of the ESI is moderate to good. Reliability of the paedCTAS is moderate and is poor to moderate for the ATS.The internal validity is moderate for the MTS and confirmed for the CTAS, but not studied for the most recent version of the ESI, which contains specific fever criteria for children.

CONCLUSION

The MTS and paedCTAS both seem valid to triage children in paediatric emergency care. Reliability of the MTS is good, moderate to good for the ESI and moderate for the paedCTAS. More studies are necessary to evaluate if one triage system is superior over other systems when applied in emergency care.

摘要

背景

儿科急救中的分诊是优先处理重病儿童的重要工具。分诊还可用于识别不需要紧急护理且可以安全等待的患者。本综述的目的是提供儿科急救中当前分诊系统的可靠性和有效性的文献综述。

方法

我们在 Pubmed 和 Cochrane 上搜索了关于儿童分诊系统可靠性和有效性的研究。

结果

曼彻斯特分诊系统(MTS)、紧急严重程度指数(ESI)、加拿大儿科分诊和急症评分(paedCTAS)和澳大利亚分诊量表(ATS)是常用的分诊系统,包含针对儿童的特定部分。MTS 的可靠性良好,ESI 的可靠性为中等至良好。paedCTAS 的可靠性为中等,ATS 的可靠性为差至中等。MTS 的内部有效性为中等,CTAS 得到了证实,但最新版本的 ESI 未进行研究,该版本包含儿童特定的发热标准。

结论

MTS 和 paedCTAS 似乎都可用于儿科急救中的儿童分诊。MTS 的可靠性良好,ESI 的可靠性为中等至良好,paedCTAS 的可靠性为中等。需要更多的研究来评估在急诊护理中应用时,一种分诊系统是否优于其他系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ab/2747834/0f43710b4e7b/1757-7241-17-38-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ab/2747834/0f43710b4e7b/1757-7241-17-38-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ab/2747834/0f43710b4e7b/1757-7241-17-38-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of triage systems in paediatric emergency care.儿科急诊分诊系统的可靠性和有效性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009 Aug 27;17:38. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-38.
2
Reliability of triage systems for paediatric emergency care: a systematic review.儿科急诊分诊系统的可靠性:系统评价。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Apr;36(4):231-238. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207781. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
3
Validity of triage systems for paediatric emergency care: a systematic review.儿科急诊分诊系统的有效性:系统评价。
Emerg Med J. 2017 Nov;34(11):711-719. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2016-206058. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
4
Pediatric emergency triage systems.儿科急诊分诊系统。
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2022 Jul 15;41:e2021038. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2023/41/2021038. eCollection 2022.
5
Validity and Reliability of the Emergency Severity Index and Triage System in Pediatric Emergency Care of Mofid Children's Hospital in Iran.伊朗莫菲德儿童医院儿科急诊护理中急诊严重程度指数及分诊系统的有效性与可靠性
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2018 Oct;6(4):329-333. doi: 10.29252/beat-060410.
6
Modern triage in the emergency department.现代急诊科分诊。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Dec;107(50):892-8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0892. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
7
Validation of different pediatric triage systems in the emergency department.急诊科不同儿科分诊系统的验证
World J Emerg Med. 2017;8(3):223-227. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.03.010.
8
A Review of the Roles and Implementation of Pediatric Emergency Triage Systems in China and Other Countries.中国及其他国家儿科急诊分诊系统的角色和实施综述。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Dec 5;29:e941582. doi: 10.12659/MSM.941582.
9
[Scientific Literature on the Reliability and Validity of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) Protocol: A Integrative Literature Review].[关于曼彻斯特分诊系统(MTS)协议可靠性和有效性的科学文献:一项综合文献综述]
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015 Feb;49(1):144-51. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420150000100019.
10
Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.急诊严重程度指数第4版:儿科急诊科分诊中有效且可靠的工具。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):753-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182621813.

引用本文的文献

1
Relieving the pediatric emergency department by referring low triaged patients using the Manchester Triage System.通过使用曼彻斯特分诊系统转诊低级别分诊患者来缓解儿科急诊科压力。
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jun 10;184(7):412. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06230-5.
2
Clinical validity of the Pediatric Assessment Triangle in a pediatric emergency department.儿科评估三角在儿科急诊科的临床有效性。
Front Pediatr. 2025 May 13;13:1435604. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1435604. eCollection 2025.
3
The association between urgency level and hospital admission, mortality and resource utilization in three emergency department triage systems: an observational multicenter study.

本文引用的文献

1
Repeatability of the Manchester Triage System for children.儿童曼彻斯特分诊系统的可重复性。
Emerg Med J. 2010 Jul;27(7):512-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.077750. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
2
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.加权kappa系数:用于衡量名义尺度上的一致性,并考虑了尺度不一致或部分得分的情况。
Psychol Bull. 1968 Oct;70(4):213-20. doi: 10.1037/h0026256.
3
Observer agreement of the Manchester Triage System and the Emergency Severity Index: a simulation study.曼彻斯特分诊系统与急诊严重程度指数的观察者一致性:一项模拟研究。
三种急诊科分诊系统中紧急程度与住院、死亡率及资源利用之间的关联:一项观察性多中心研究
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 May 1;33(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01392-5.
4
Comparison between the Smart Triage model and the Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment guidelines in triaging children presenting to the emergency departments of two public hospitals in Kenya.肯尼亚两家公立医院急诊科对儿童进行分诊时,智能分诊模型与急诊分诊评估与治疗指南的比较。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Aug 1;3(8):e0000408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000408. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Factors Affecting Length of Stay in Pediatric Emergency Department in a Teaching Hospital in Saudi Arabia.影响沙特阿拉伯一家教学医院儿科急诊停留时间的因素。
Med Arch. 2023;77(4):268-275. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2023.77.268-275.
6
Validation of a modified South African triage scale in a high-resource setting: a retrospective cohort study.在高资源环境下验证改良的南非分诊量表:回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Mar 20;31(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01076-y.
7
Telephone Referral to a Paediatric Emergency Department: Why Do Parents Not Show Up?转诊至儿科急诊科:为何家长未到场?
Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;10(2):179. doi: 10.3390/children10020179.
8
Validity of the Paediatric Canadian Triage Acuity Scale in a Tertiary Hospital: An Analysis of Severity Markers' Variability.儿科加拿大分诊 acuity 量表在三级医院的有效性:严重程度标志物可变性分析。
J Med Syst. 2023 Jan 30;47(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01913-8.
9
Variation in low-value radiograph use for children in the emergency department: a cross-sectional study of administrative databases.低价值 X 光片在急诊科儿童中的使用情况存在差异:一项基于行政数据库的横断面研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Oct 11;10(4):E889-E899. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210140. Print 2022 Sep-Oct.
10
Using the Delphi method to establish pediatric emergency triage criteria in a grade A tertiary women's and children's hospital in China.采用德尔菲法在中国一家 A 级三级妇女儿童医院建立儿科急诊分诊标准。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 12;22(1):1154. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08528-8.
Emerg Med J. 2009 Aug;26(8):556-60. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.059378.
4
Manchester Triage in Sweden - interrater reliability and accuracy.瑞典的曼彻斯特分诊法——评估者间信度与准确性
Int Emerg Nurs. 2009 Jul;17(3):143-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2008.11.008. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
5
Adjusting weighted kappa for severity of mistriage decreases reported reliability of emergency department triage systems: a comparative study.调整错分严重程度的加权 Kappa 可降低急诊分诊系统报告可靠性:一项比较研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Nov;62(11):1196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
6
Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: a review.临床预测规则的验证、更新及影响:综述
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Nov;61(11):1085-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.04.008.
7
Validity of the Canadian Paediatric Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care hospital.加拿大儿科分诊及 acuity 量表在三级护理医院中的有效性。 (注:原文中“acuity”可能有误,推测可能是“Acuity Scale”即“ acuity scale” ,直译为“ acuity量表” ,这里按推测完整翻译为“分诊及 acuity 量表” ,具体需结合完整文本进一步确认。)
CJEM. 2009 Jan;11(1):23-8. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500010885.
8
Interrater agreement between nurses for the Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in a tertiary care center.三级护理中心护士对加拿大儿科分诊及 acuity 量表的评分者间一致性。 (注:原文中“acuity”可能有误,推测可能是“Acuity Scale”即“ acuity scale”,意为“ acuity 量表”,这里按推测翻译。)
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;15(12):1262-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00268.x. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
9
Correlation of the Canadian Pediatric Emergency Triage and Acuity Scale to ED resource utilization.加拿大儿科急诊分诊与 acuity 量表与急诊科资源利用的相关性。 (注:这里“acuity”常见释义为“敏锐;敏锐度” ,在医学领域可能有更专业特定含义,结合语境可能指病情严重程度等相关概念,但仅根据现有文本准确翻译只能是“敏锐度”,整体翻译表述可能需根据该量表完整背景知识进一步优化。)
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Oct;26(8):893-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.02.024.
10
Manchester triage system in paediatric emergency care: prospective observational study.儿科急诊护理中的曼彻斯特分诊系统:前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ. 2008 Sep 22;337:a1501. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1501.