• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算咖啡果小蠹(鞘翅目:小蠹科)造成的产量损失并计算多哥咖啡种植园的经济损害阈值。

Estimation of production losses caused by the coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and calculation of an economic damage threshold in Togolese coffee plots.

作者信息

Wegbe Komlan, Cilas Christian, Decazy Bernard, Alauzet Claude, Dufour Bernard

机构信息

Centre de Recherche Agronomique zone Forestière, BP 90 Kpalimé, Togo.

出版信息

J Econ Entomol. 2003 Oct;96(5):1473-8. doi: 10.1093/jee/96.5.1473.

DOI:10.1093/jee/96.5.1473
PMID:14650520
Abstract

The coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), which exists in all coffee producing zones, is a major pest. The seriousness of this scolytid was assessed in Togolese plots spread over five agroclimatic zones, by determining the attack rate from a sample of coffee trees. The work was carried out over 2 yr and revealed that weight losses were proportional to the attack rates. The average infestation rates were 5.64% in the first year and 6.36% in the second year, while total production losses amounted to 2.60% and 3.18%, respectively, for the same periods. Generally speaking, attack rates in the plots were low and varied considerably within a given zone. Plantations located on plateau were more severely attacked than those in the plains. A relationship was established between total losses and the cost of insecticide treatment; this relationship was used to calculate an economic damage threshold beyond which control proves to be cost effective.

摘要

咖啡果小蠹(Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari),鞘翅目:小蠹科)存在于所有咖啡种植区,是一种主要害虫。通过测定咖啡树样本的受害率,对分布在多哥五个农业气候区的地块中这种小蠹的危害程度进行了评估。这项工作持续了两年,结果表明重量损失与受害率成正比。第一年的平均侵染率为5.64%,第二年为6.36%,而同期的总生产损失分别为2.60%和3.18%。总体而言,地块中的受害率较低,且在给定区域内差异很大。位于高原的种植园比平原的种植园受到的侵害更严重。确定了总损失与杀虫剂处理成本之间的关系;利用这种关系计算出了经济损害阈值,超过该阈值进行防治被证明具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Estimation of production losses caused by the coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and calculation of an economic damage threshold in Togolese coffee plots.估算咖啡果小蠹(鞘翅目:小蠹科)造成的产量损失并计算多哥咖啡种植园的经济损害阈值。
J Econ Entomol. 2003 Oct;96(5):1473-8. doi: 10.1093/jee/96.5.1473.
2
Coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) population dynamics across Hawaii Island's diverse coffee-growing landscape: optimizing location-specific pesticide applications.夏威夷岛多样咖啡种植景观下咖啡浆果象甲(鞘翅目:象甲科)种群动态:优化特定位置的农药应用。
J Econ Entomol. 2024 Jun 10;117(3):963-972. doi: 10.1093/jee/toae061.
3
Economic injury level for the coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) using attractive traps in Brazilian coffee fields.巴西咖啡田中利用诱捕器防治咖啡果小蠹的经济损害水平(鞘翅目:象甲科:小蠹科)。
J Econ Entomol. 2011 Dec;104(6):1909-17. doi: 10.1603/ec11032.
4
Pest Management Strategies Against the Coffee Berry Borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae).防治咖啡果小蠹(鞘翅目:象甲科:小蠹科)的害虫管理策略。
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 May 30;66(21):5275-5280. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04875. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
5
Postharvest Population Reservoirs of Coffee Berry Borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Hawai'i Island.夏威夷岛咖啡浆果象甲(鞘翅目:象甲科)采后种群贮源。
J Econ Entomol. 2019 Dec 9;112(6):2833-2841. doi: 10.1093/jee/toz219.
6
Flight Activity and Field Infestation Relationships for Coffee Berry Borer in Commercial Coffee Plantations in Kona and Kau Districts, Hawaii.夏威夷科纳和考艾地区商业咖啡种植园中咖啡果小蠹的飞行活动与田间侵染关系
J Econ Entomol. 2017 Dec 5;110(6):2421-2427. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox215.
7
Short-distance dispersal of Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) females (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytidae) during the coffee tree fruiting period.咖啡果小蠹(Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari))雌虫在咖啡树结果期的短距离扩散(鞘翅目:象甲科:小蠹科)
Bull Entomol Res. 2018 Oct;108(5):593-601. doi: 10.1017/S0007485317001122. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
8
Efficacy of long-lasting insecticide-incorporated nets on 2 scolytinae pests, the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei and tropical nut borer Hypothenemus obscurus under laboratory conditions.实验室条件下长效杀虫剂浸渍网对咖啡果蛀果象 Hypothenemus hampei 和热带坚果蛀象 Hypothenemus obscurus 两种长蠹科害虫的防治效果。
J Econ Entomol. 2024 Apr 12;117(2):545-554. doi: 10.1093/jee/toae020.
9
A review of the biology and control of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).咖啡果小蠹(Hypothenemus hampei)(鞘翅目:小蠹科)的生物学与防治综述
Bull Entomol Res. 2000 Dec;90(6):453-65. doi: 10.1017/s0007485300000584.
10
First record of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in Pará nut, Bertholletia excelsa (Lecythidaceae).咖啡果小蠹Hypothenemus hampei(法拉利)(鞘翅目:小蠹科)在巴西栗Bertholletia excelsa(玉蕊科)上的首次记录。
Neotrop Entomol. 2009 May-Jun;38(3):430-1. doi: 10.1590/s1519-566x2009000300020.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergence and Infestation Level of Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Coffee Berries on the Plant or on the Ground During the Post-harvest Period in Brazil.咖啡果穗瘿蚊(鞘翅目:象甲科)在巴西收获期后在植株或地上的咖啡浆果上的发生和为害程度。
J Insect Sci. 2021 Mar 1;21(2). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieab022.
2
Coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) development across an elevational gradient on Hawai'i Island: Applying laboratory degree-day predictions to natural field populations.咖啡果蛀虫(Hypothenemus hampei)(鞘翅目:象甲科)在夏威夷岛海拔梯度上的发育:将实验室度日预测应用于自然田间种群。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 17;14(7):e0218321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218321. eCollection 2019.
3
The Hawaii Protocol for Scientific Monitoring of Coffee Berry Borer: a Model for Coffee Agroecosystems Worldwide.
《夏威夷咖啡果小蠹科学监测议定书:全球咖啡农业生态系统的典范》
J Vis Exp. 2018 Mar 19(133):57204. doi: 10.3791/57204.
4
The Coffee Berry Borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Puerto Rico: Distribution, Infestation, and Population per Fruit.波多黎各的咖啡果小蠹(鞘翅目:象甲科):分布、侵染情况及每颗果实的虫口数量
J Insect Sci. 2017 Jan 1;17(2). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iew125.
5
A Coffee Berry Borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) Bibliography.咖啡果小蠹(鞘翅目:象甲科:小蠹亚科)文献目录
J Insect Sci. 2015 Jul 1;15(1). doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iev053. Print 2015.