Gokalp A, Inal M, Maralcan G, Baskonus I
Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Acta Chir Belg. 2003 Oct;103(5):502-6. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2003.11679476.
Ideal technique for effective inguinal hernia repair is still controversial. Although open tension free mesh techniques of inguinal hernia repair offers good results but the superiority of laparoscopic technique was reported for postoperative pain, discomfort and earlier return back to work. A prospective, randomized study was conducted to compare Lichtenstein open tension free mesh technique with the laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal technique. 62 male patients with Lichtenstein open tension free mesh technique and 61 male patients with totally extraperitoneal technique were operated and compared postoperatively. The patients were followed-up for 24 months with a median of 18 months. In terms of recurrence, postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, complications, hospital stay length, duration of limitation of normal daily activities there were no significant differences between the two groups. Operating time for totally extraperitoneal hernia repair was 16 minutes longer than Lichtenstein open tension free technique. The totally extraperitoneal technique was considerably expensive than Lichtenstein technique, however the duration of returning back to work was shorter in patients repaired with totally extraperitoneal technique. In conclusion in primary inguinal hernia repair Lichtenstein technique should be preferred and the totally extraperitoneal technique should be considered for recurrent and bilateral hernias.
有效腹股沟疝修补的理想技术仍存在争议。尽管腹股沟疝修补的开放无张力网片技术效果良好,但据报道腹腔镜技术在术后疼痛、不适以及更早恢复工作方面具有优势。进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,比较李金斯坦开放无张力网片技术与腹腔镜完全腹膜外技术。对62例行李金斯坦开放无张力网片技术的男性患者和61例行完全腹膜外技术的男性患者进行手术,并在术后进行比较。患者随访24个月,中位随访时间为18个月。在复发、术后疼痛、镇痛需求、并发症、住院时间、正常日常活动受限持续时间方面,两组之间无显著差异。完全腹膜外疝修补的手术时间比李金斯坦开放无张力技术长16分钟。完全腹膜外技术比李金斯坦技术昂贵得多,然而,接受完全腹膜外技术修补的患者恢复工作的时间更短。总之,在原发性腹股沟疝修补中,应首选李金斯坦技术,而对于复发性和双侧疝应考虑完全腹膜外技术。