Latt L D, Sparto P J, Furman J M, Redfern M S
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Gait Posture. 2003 Oct;18(2):64-72. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(02)00195-9.
Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) applied between the mastoids during quiet standing elicits postural sway. The aim of this study was to characterize the postural sway response to continuous sinusoidal GVS across various stimulus frequencies and amplitudes. Binaural bipolar sinusoidal GVS was applied to the skin overlying the mastoid processes of 10 subjects while they stood on a force plate with eyes closed. The position of the center of pressure (COP) at the feet was recorded from a forceplate, while the head displacement was measured with a magnetic position tracking system. The stimulus conditions included four frequencies (0.1, 0.25, 0.45, and 1.1 Hz) and five peak amplitudes (0.05, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mA). Each subject experienced one trial at each amplitude-frequency pair. Additionally, each subject underwent three trials in which a dual-frequency stimulus (0.1 plus 0.45 Hz at a peak of 0.5 mA each) was presented. The stimuli elicited sway in the frontal plane in all subjects, as evidenced by changes in the displacement of the COP and head. Sway magnitude decreased with increasing stimulus frequency and increased with increasing stimulus amplitude. However, the response magnitude saturated at higher stimulus amplitudes. Phase lag increased with increasing stimulus frequency. The response to the dual-frequency stimulus was reduced at 0.1 Hz and nearly equal at 0.45 Hz in comparison with the single-frequency responses. This study suggests that the postural sway response is nonlinear due to saturation and violation of the principle of superposition.
在安静站立期间,在乳突之间施加的电前庭刺激(GVS)会引发姿势摆动。本研究的目的是描述在各种刺激频率和幅度下对连续正弦GVS的姿势摆动反应特征。在10名受试者闭眼站在测力平台上时,将双耳双极正弦GVS施加于乳突上方的皮肤。通过测力平台记录双脚处压力中心(COP)的位置,同时用磁定位跟踪系统测量头部位移。刺激条件包括四个频率(0.1、0.25、0.45和1.1赫兹)和五个峰值幅度(0.05、0.1、0.25、0.5和1.0毫安)。每个受试者在每个幅度-频率对下进行一次试验。此外,每个受试者还进行了三次试验,其中呈现双频刺激(0.1加0.45赫兹,每个峰值为0.5毫安)。如COP和头部位移变化所示,刺激在所有受试者中都引发了额平面的摆动。摆动幅度随刺激频率增加而减小,随刺激幅度增加而增大。然而,在较高刺激幅度下反应幅度达到饱和。相位滞后随刺激频率增加而增大。与单频反应相比,双频刺激在0.1赫兹时的反应降低,在0.45赫兹时几乎相等。本研究表明,由于饱和以及叠加原理的违背,姿势摆动反应是非线性的。