Jortani Saeed A, Prabhu Sumanth D, Valdes Roland
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
Clin Chem. 2004 Feb;50(2):265-78. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.027557. Epub 2003 Dec 4.
Heart failure (HF) is a devastating disease with increasing prevalence in elderly populations. One-half of all patients die within 5 years of diagnosis. The annual cost of treating patients with HF in the US is more than $20 billion, which is estimated to be greater than that of myocardial infarction and all cancers combined. Given the complex pathophysiology and varied manifestations of HF, interest has intensified in developing biological markers to predict susceptibility and aid in the early diagnosis and management of this disease.
We searched Medline via Ovid for studies published during the period 1966-2003 regarding various biomarkers suggested for HF. Our review focused on developing strategies for discovering and using new biomarkers, particularly those potentially linked to pathophysiologic mechanisms. We also point out strategic advantages, limitations, and methods available for measuring each of the currently proposed markers.
Biomarkers reviewed include those released from the heart during normal homeostasis (natriuretic peptides), those produced elsewhere that act on the heart (endogenous cardiotonic steroids and other hormones), and those released in response to tissue damage (inflammatory cytokines). The concept of using a combination of multiple markers based on diagnosis, prognosis, and acute vs chronic disease is also discussed. In view of recent advances in our understanding of molecular biochemical derangements observed during cardiac failure, we consider the concept of myocardial remodeling and the heart as part of an endocrine system as strategies.
Strategically, biomarkers linked to mechanisms involved in the etiology of HF, such as dysregulation of ion transport, seem best suited for serving as early biological markers to predict and diagnose disease, select therapy, or assess progression.
心力衰竭(HF)是一种破坏性疾病,在老年人群中的患病率不断上升。所有患者中有一半在诊断后5年内死亡。在美国,治疗HF患者的年度费用超过200亿美元,估计超过心肌梗死和所有癌症的费用总和。鉴于HF复杂的病理生理学和多样的表现,人们对开发生物标志物以预测易感性并辅助该疾病的早期诊断和管理的兴趣日益浓厚。
我们通过Ovid在Medline上搜索了1966年至2003年期间发表的关于HF各种生物标志物的研究。我们的综述重点是开发发现和使用新生物标志物的策略,特别是那些可能与病理生理机制相关的标志物。我们还指出了测量每种当前提出的标志物的策略优势、局限性和可用方法。
综述的生物标志物包括在正常稳态下从心脏释放的物质(利钠肽)、在其他部位产生并作用于心脏的物质(内源性强心类固醇和其他激素)以及因组织损伤而释放的物质(炎性细胞因子)。还讨论了基于诊断、预后以及急性与慢性疾病使用多种标志物组合的概念。鉴于我们对心力衰竭期间观察到的分子生化紊乱的最新认识进展,我们将心肌重塑概念以及心脏作为内分泌系统的一部分视为策略。
从策略上讲,与HF病因机制相关的生物标志物,如离子转运失调,似乎最适合作为预测和诊断疾病、选择治疗或评估病情进展的早期生物标志物。