Dunfield Kari E, Germida James J
Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Dec;69(12):7310-8. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7310-7318.2003.
The introduction of transgenic plants into agricultural ecosystems has raised the question of the ecological impact of these plants on nontarget organisms, such as soil bacteria. Although differences in both the genetic structure and the metabolic function of the microbial communities associated with some transgenic plant lines have been established, it remains to be seen whether these differences have an ecological impact on the soil microbial communities. We conducted a 2-year, multiple-site field study in which rhizosphere samples associated with a transgenic canola variety and a conventional canola variety were sampled at six times throughout the growing season. The objectives of this study were to identify differences between the rhizosphere microbial community associated with the transgenic plants and the rhizosphere microbial community associated with the conventional canola plants and to determine whether the differences were permanent or depended on the presence of the plant. Community-level physiological profiles, fatty acid methyl ester profiles, and terminal amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis profiles of rhizosphere microbial communities were compared to the profiles of the microbial community associated with an unplanted, fallow field plot. Principal-component analysis showed that there was variation in the microbial community associated with both canola variety and growth season. Importantly, while differences between the microbial communities associated with the transgenic plant variety were observed at several times throughout the growing season, all analyses indicated that when the microbial communities were assessed after winter, there were no differences between microbial communities from field plots that contained harvested transgenic canola plants and microbial communities from field plots that did not contain plants during the field season. Hence, the changes in the microbial community structure associated with genetically modified plants were temporary and did not persist into the next field season.
将转基因植物引入农业生态系统引发了这些植物对非靶标生物(如土壤细菌)生态影响的问题。尽管已经确定了与一些转基因植物品系相关的微生物群落的遗传结构和代谢功能存在差异,但这些差异是否对土壤微生物群落产生生态影响仍有待观察。我们进行了一项为期两年的多地点田间研究,在整个生长季节分六次采集与转基因油菜品种和传统油菜品种相关的根际样本。本研究的目的是确定与转基因植物相关的根际微生物群落和与传统油菜植物相关的根际微生物群落之间的差异,并确定这些差异是永久性的还是取决于植物的存在。将根际微生物群落的群落水平生理图谱、脂肪酸甲酯图谱和末端扩增核糖体DNA限制性分析图谱与未种植的休耕地块相关的微生物群落图谱进行比较。主成分分析表明,与油菜品种和生长季节相关的微生物群落存在差异。重要的是,虽然在整个生长季节的几次观察中都发现了与转基因植物品种相关的微生物群落之间的差异,但所有分析都表明,在冬季后评估微生物群落时,含有收获后的转基因油菜植物的田间地块的微生物群落与在田间季节不含有植物的田间地块的微生物群落之间没有差异。因此,与转基因植物相关的微生物群落结构变化是暂时的,不会持续到下一个田间季节。