Mascini E M, Jalink K P, Kamp-Hopmans T E M, Blok H E M, Verhoef J, Bonten M J M, Troelstra A
Department of Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention, Eijkman-Winkler Centre for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, and Inflammation, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Dec;41(12):5377-83. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5377-5383.2003.
In May 2000, the first outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) was detected in the University Medical Center Utrecht in the nephrology ward. The question arose why some VREF strains spread among hospitalized patients, whereas other strains do not. Thirty patients who were found to be colonized with VREF between May and November 2000 were included in the study. Molecular typing confirmed that 19 of them carried an identical epidemic strain which harbored the esp gene while 11 were colonized by nonepidemic strains that were all esp negative. Acquisition of the outbreak strain was significantly associated with diabetes mellitus, renal transplantation, and extensive use of antibiotics, especially cephalosporins, in the 2-month period before the first isolation of VREF. To establish the duration of colonization, prospective surveillance of VREF carriage for a 6-month period starting from the first isolation of VREF was realized for 20 patients. After 6 months, VREF was still recovered from 60% of carriers of the outbreak strain versus 20% of carriers of nonepidemic strains (P < 0.01). However, antibiotic use during the follow-up period was significantly higher by carriers of the outbreak strain than by carriers of nonepidemic strains. The fact that the outbreak strain was recovered for a longer period of time than nonepidemic strains may facilitate dissemination of the strain. The results support a careful restrictive antibiotic policy for wards at risk for spread of VREF and implementation of isolation precautions for patients who are colonized with esp-positive outbreak strains.
2000年5月,乌得勒支大学医学中心的肾病病房首次检测到耐万古霉素屎肠球菌(VREF)疫情。问题是,为什么有些VREF菌株在住院患者中传播,而其他菌株却不会。该研究纳入了2000年5月至11月期间被发现感染VREF的30名患者。分子分型证实,其中19人携带了相同的流行菌株,该菌株含有esp基因,而11人被非流行菌株定植,这些菌株均为esp阴性。在首次分离出VREF前的2个月内,感染暴发菌株与糖尿病、肾移植以及大量使用抗生素(尤其是头孢菌素)显著相关。为确定定植持续时间,对20名患者从首次分离出VREF开始进行了为期6个月的VREF携带情况前瞻性监测。6个月后,60%的暴发菌株携带者仍能检测到VREF,而非流行菌株携带者的这一比例为20%(P<0.01)。然而,随访期间暴发菌株携带者的抗生素使用量显著高于非流行菌株携带者。暴发菌株比非流行菌株检出时间更长这一事实可能有助于该菌株的传播。研究结果支持对有VREF传播风险的病房采取谨慎的限制性抗生素政策,并对感染esp阳性暴发菌株的患者实施隔离预防措施。