Whaley Shannon E, Sigman Marian, Neumann Charlotte, Bwibo Nimrod, Guthrie Donald, Weiss Robert E, Alber Susan, Murphy Suzanne P
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Nutr. 2003 Nov;133(11 Suppl 2):3965S-3971S. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.11.3965S.
Previous observational studies in developing countries have suggested that diet quality, particularly increased animal source food (ASF) consumption, is positively associated with child cognitive development. This report presents findings from a study in rural Kenya, designed to test the impact of three different diets on the cognitive development of school children. Twelve schools with a total of 555 Standard 1 children (equivalent to U.S. Grade 1) were randomized to one of four feeding interventions: Meat, Milk, Energy or Control (no feeding). Feeding continued for seven school terms (21 mo), and cognitive tests were administered before the commencement of feeding and during every other term of feeding. Hierarchical linear random effects models and associated methods were used to examine the effects of treatment group on changes in cognitive performance over time. Analyses revealed that children receiving supplemental food with meat significantly outperformed all other children on the Raven's Progressive Matrices. Children supplemented with meat, and children supplemented with energy, outperformed children in the Control group on tests of arithmetic ability. There were no group differences on tests of verbal comprehension. Results suggest that supplementation with animal source food has positive effects on Kenyan children's cognitive performance. However, these effects are not equivalent across all domains of cognitive functioning, nor did different forms of animal source foods produce the same beneficial effects. Implications of these findings for supplementation programs in developing countries are discussed.
此前在发展中国家开展的观察性研究表明,饮食质量,尤其是动物源性食物(ASF)摄入量的增加,与儿童认知发展呈正相关。本报告展示了在肯尼亚农村开展的一项研究结果,该研究旨在测试三种不同饮食对学龄儿童认知发展的影响。12所学校的555名一年级学生(相当于美国一年级)被随机分为四种喂养干预组之一:肉类组、奶类组、能量组或对照组(不进行喂养)。喂养持续七个学期(21个月),在喂养开始前以及每隔一个学期进行认知测试。使用分层线性随机效应模型及相关方法来检验治疗组对认知表现随时间变化的影响。分析表明,在瑞文标准推理测验中,接受肉类补充食物的儿童显著优于所有其他儿童。在算术能力测试中,补充肉类的儿童和补充能量的儿童表现优于对照组儿童。在语言理解测试中,各小组之间没有差异。结果表明,补充动物源性食物对肯尼亚儿童的认知表现有积极影响。然而,这些影响在认知功能的所有领域并不等同,不同形式的动物源性食物也没有产生相同的有益效果。本文讨论了这些研究结果对发展中国家补充项目的启示。