Rothschild Louis, Cleland Charles, Haslam Nick, Zimmerman Mark
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Rhode Island Hospital/Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI, USA.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2003 Nov;112(4):657-66. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.657.
Taxometric methodology was used to determine whether borderline personality disorder (BPD) represents a taxon that is categorically distinct from normal personality or whether it falls on a dimensional continuum with normality. Two taxometric procedures were used with a sample of 1,389 outpatients assessed for BPD symptoms by semistructured interview. The procedures indicated that BPD does not represent a latent category. Implications are drawn for the conceptualization and etiology of BPD, and for the categorical versus dimensional status of personality disorders in general.
采用分类测量法来确定边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是否代表一个与正常人格截然不同的分类单元,或者它是否处于与正常状态的维度连续体上。对1389名通过半结构化访谈评估BPD症状的门诊患者样本使用了两种分类测量程序。这些程序表明BPD并不代表一个潜在类别。由此得出了关于BPD的概念化和病因学,以及一般人格障碍的分类与维度状态的相关推论。