University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA.
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Aug;53(6):765-74. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
Empirical evidence is increasing in support of the validity of the construct of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in adolescence. There is growing consensus that the early identification and treatment of emerging borderline traits may be an important focus. However, few diagnostic (questionnaire- or interview-based) measures specifically developed or adapted for adolescents and children exist. The Childhood Interview for DSM-IV Borderline Personality Disorder (CI-BPD) [Zanarini, 2003] is a promising interview-based measure of adolescent BPD. Currently, no studies have explicitly been designed to examine the psychometric properties of the CI-BPD. The aim of the current study was to examine various psychometric properties of the CI-BPD in an inpatient sample of adolescents (n = 245). A confirmatory factor analytic approach was used to examine the internal factor structure of the 9 CI-BPD items. In addition, internal consistency, interrater reliability, convergent validity (with clinician diagnosis and 2 questionnaire-based measures of BPD), and concurrent validity (with Axis I psychopathology and deliberate self-harm) were examined. Similar to several adult studies, the confirmatory factor analytic results supported a unidimensional factor structure for the CI-BPD, indicating that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, criteria on which the CI-BPD is based constitute a coherent combination of traits and symptoms even in adolescents. In addition, other validity criteria were excellent. Taken together, the current study provides strong evidence for the validity of the CI-BPD for use in adolescents.
越来越多的实证证据支持边缘型人格障碍(BPD)在青少年中的有效性。越来越多的共识认为,早期识别和治疗新兴的边缘特征可能是一个重要的焦点。然而,很少有专门为青少年和儿童开发或改编的诊断(问卷或访谈为基础)措施。DSM-IV 边缘型人格障碍儿童访谈(CI-BPD)[Zanarini,2003]是一种基于访谈的有前途的青少年 BPD 测量方法。目前,尚无研究明确旨在检查 CI-BPD 的心理计量学特性。本研究的目的是在青少年住院样本(n=245)中检查 CI-BPD 的各种心理计量学特性。采用验证性因子分析方法检查 9 项 CI-BPD 项目的内部因子结构。此外,还检查了内部一致性、评分者间信度、聚合效度(与临床医生诊断和 2 项基于问卷的 BPD 测量)和同时效度(与轴 I 精神病理学和故意自残)。与几项成人研究相似,验证性因子分析结果支持 CI-BPD 的单维因子结构,这表明基于 CI-BPD 的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版标准构成了特征和症状的连贯组合,即使在青少年中也是如此。此外,其他有效性标准也非常出色。综上所述,本研究为 CI-BPD 在青少年中的有效性提供了有力证据。