• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

正常与异常人格量表的项目反应理论整合。

An item response theory integration of normal and abnormal personality scales.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2010 Jan;1(1):5-21. doi: 10.1037/a0018136.

DOI:10.1037/a0018136
PMID:20458359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2865698/
Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–IV–TR) currently conceptualizes personality disorders (PDs) as categorical syndromes that are distinct from normal personality. However, an alternative dimensional viewpoint is that PDs are maladaptive expressions of general personality traits. The dimensional perspective postulates that personality pathology exists at a more extreme level of the latent trait than does general personality. This hypothesis was examined using item response theory analyses comparing scales from two personality pathology instruments—the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ; Livesley & Jackson, in press) and the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP; Clark, 1993; Clark, Simms, Wu, & Casillas, in press)—with scales from an instrument designed to assess normal range personality, the NEO Personality Inventory–Revised (NEO PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992). The results indicate that respective scales from these instruments assess shared latent constructs, with the NEO PI-R providing more information at the lower (normal) range and the DAPP-BQ and SNAP providing more information at the higher (abnormal) range. Nevertheless, the results also demonstrated substantial overlap in coverage. Implications of the findings are discussed with respect to the study and development of items that would provide specific discriminations along underlying trait continua.

摘要

《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM-IV-TR)目前将人格障碍(PD)概念化为与正常人格不同的分类综合征。然而,另一种维度观点认为,PD 是一般人格特质的适应不良表现。维度观点假设人格病理存在于潜在特质的更极端水平,而不是一般人格。使用项目反应理论分析检验了这一假设,该分析比较了两个人格病理工具的量表——人格病理维度评估问卷-基础问卷(DAPP-BQ;Livesley & Jackson,即将出版)和不适应和适应人格量表(SNAP;Clark,1993;Clark、Simms、Wu 和 Casillas,即将出版)——与旨在评估正常范围人格的工具的量表,即《大五人格量表修订版》(NEO PI-R;Costa 和 McCrae,1992)。结果表明,这些工具的各自量表评估了共同的潜在结构,NEO PI-R 在较低(正常)范围内提供了更多信息,而 DAPP-BQ 和 SNAP 在较高(异常)范围内提供了更多信息。然而,结果也表明存在大量重叠。讨论了这些发现对潜在特质连续体进行具体区分的项目研究和开发的意义。

相似文献

1
An item response theory integration of normal and abnormal personality scales.正常与异常人格量表的项目反应理论整合。
Personal Disord. 2010 Jan;1(1):5-21. doi: 10.1037/a0018136.
2
The convergent, discriminant, and structural relationship of the DAPP-BQ and SNAP with the ICD-11, DSM-5, and FFM trait models.DAPP-BQ 和 SNAP 与 ICD-11、DSM-5 和 FFM 特质模型的会聚、区别和结构关系。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):18-28. doi: 10.1037/pas0000757. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
3
The hierarchical structure of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology (DAPP-BQ).人格障碍多维评定量表(DAPP-BQ)的层次结构。
J Pers Disord. 2011 Aug;25(4):504-16. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.4.504.
4
Assessment of maladaptive variants of Five-Factor Model traits.五因素模型特质的适应不良变异评估。
J Pers. 2012 Dec;80(6):1593-614. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00775.x.
5
Personality disorder dysfunction versus traits: structural and conceptual issues.人格障碍功能障碍与特质:结构和概念问题。
Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):293-303. doi: 10.1037/per0000018. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
6
Psychometric properties of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality in a PTSD sample.创伤后应激障碍样本中不适应和适应人格量表的心理测量特性。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):911-24. doi: 10.1037/a0023985. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
7
Testing Two Alternative Pathological Personality Measures in the Assessment of Psychopathy: An Examination of the Snap and DAPP-BQ.在精神病态评估中测试两种替代性病态人格测量方法:对《快速诊断量表》和《人格障碍问卷简版》的检验
J Pers Disord. 2009 Feb;23(1):85-100. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2009.23.1.85.
8
Predicting dimensions of personality disorder from domains and facets of the Five-Factor Model.从五因素模型的领域和层面预测人格障碍的维度
J Pers. 2001 Apr;69(2):199-222. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00142.
9
Hierarchical structure of maladaptive personality traits in older adults: joint factor analysis of the PID-5 and the DAPP-BQ.老年人适应不良人格特质的层次结构:PID-5 和 DAPP-BQ 的联合因子分析。
J Pers Disord. 2014 Apr;28(2):198-211. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2013_27_114. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
10
Factor structure of the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire and its relationship with the revised NEO personality inventory in a Japanese sample.日本样本中人格病理学维度评估基本问卷的因子结构及其与修订后的大五人格问卷的关系
Compr Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;47(6):528-33. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2006.03.006. Epub 2006 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
An exploratory study on disinhibition and interpersonal outcomes in daily life.一项关于日常生活中去抑制作用和人际结果的探索性研究。
Personal Disord. 2024 Nov 18. doi: 10.1037/per0000707.
2
Does a Concise Patient-reported Outcome Measure Provide a Valid Measure of Physical Function for Cancer Patients After Lower Extremity Surgery?一种简明的患者报告结局指标能否有效衡量下肢手术后癌症患者的身体功能?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):62-75. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003257. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
3
Convergence of the dimensional assessment of personality pathology (DAPP-BQ) and the five-factor personality inventory for the international classification of diseases 11th edition (FFiCD) in the context of the five-factor model and personality disorders.在五因素模型和人格障碍的背景下,人格病理学的维度评估(DAPP-BQ)与国际疾病分类第 11 版的五因素人格量表(FFiCD)的趋同。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 21;24(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05835-8.
4
Dimensional models of personality disorders: Challenges and opportunities.人格障碍的维度模型:挑战与机遇。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 7;14:1098452. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1098452. eCollection 2023.
5
From alcohol to aggression: Examining the structure and nomological network of dysregulated behaviors in a trauma-exposed community sample.从酒精到攻击行为:在经历过创伤的社区样本中考察失调行为的结构和效标网络。
J Clin Psychol. 2022 Jun;78(6):1220-1239. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23288. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
6
Unemployment and the Relationship between Borderline Personality Pathology and Health.失业与边缘型人格病理学和健康之间的关系。
J Res Pers. 2019 Oct;82. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103863. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
7
DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as extreme variants of five-factor model traits in adolescents.DSM-5 替代人格障碍模型特征在青少年中是五因素模型特征的极端变体。
Personal Disord. 2021 Jan;12(1):59-69. doi: 10.1037/per0000409. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
8
Why Psychiatric Research Must Abandon Traditional Diagnostic Classification and Adopt a Fully Dimensional Scope: Two Solutions to a Persistent Problem.为何精神病学研究必须摒弃传统诊断分类并采用全面的维度范畴:解决一个长期问题的两种方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 7;8:101. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00101. eCollection 2017.
9
Validity of personality measurement in adults with anxiety disorders: psychometric properties of the Spanish NEO-FFI-R using Rasch analyses.成人焦虑症患者人格测量的效度:基于拉施分析的西班牙文版NEO-FFI-R的心理测量特性
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 21;6:465. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00465. eCollection 2015.
10
A mixed-binomial model for Likert-type personality measures.混合二项式模型在李克特式人格测量中的应用。
Front Psychol. 2014 May 9;5:371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00371. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Capturing abnormal personality with normal personality inventories: an item response theory approach.用正常人格量表捕捉异常人格:一种项目反应理论方法。
J Pers. 2008 Dec;76(6):1623-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00533.x.
2
A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis.五因素模型与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)人格障碍之间关系的元分析综述:层面水平分析
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Dec;28(8):1326-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
3
Gender bias in diagnostic criteria for personality disorders: an item response theory analysis.人格障碍诊断标准中的性别偏见:一项项目反应理论分析。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Feb;116(1):166-75. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.166.
4
Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization.人格障碍的评估与诊断:长期存在的问题及一种新出现的概念重构
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:227-57. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190200.
5
Psychometric properties of an abbreviated instrument of the five-factor model.五因素模型简化量表的心理测量学特性
Assessment. 2006 Jun;13(2):119-37. doi: 10.1177/1073191106286748.
6
Diagnostic categories or dimensions? A question for the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders--fifth edition.诊断类别还是维度?关于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的一个问题。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Nov;114(4):494-504. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.494.
7
Behavioral and molecular genetic contributions to a dimensional classification of personality disorder.行为和分子遗传学对人格障碍维度分类的贡献。
J Pers Disord. 2005 Apr;19(2):131-55. doi: 10.1521/pedi.19.2.131.62631.
8
Validation of a computerized adaptive version of the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP).非适应性与适应性人格量表(SNAP)计算机自适应版本的验证
Psychol Assess. 2005 Mar;17(1):28-43. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.1.28.
9
Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integrative hierarchical approach.描绘正常与异常人格的结构:一种综合的层次方法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jan;88(1):139-57. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139.
10
A search for consensus on the dimensional structure of personality disorders.寻求关于人格障碍维度结构的共识。
J Clin Psychol. 2005 Mar;61(3):323-45. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20017.