Vereide A B, Arnes M, Straume B, Maltau J M, Ørbo A
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Tromsø, N-9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Dec;91(3):526-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.07.002.
To show that local application of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device was a better therapy for endometrial hyperplasia (EH) compared to per-oral gestagen treatment based on subjective (WHO criteria) and objective (prognostic data-based morphometric and stereological method/D score, predicting the risk of cancer development for each single patient) evaluation.
Women between 30 and 70 years with EH and D score > 0 were treated with levonorgestrel intrauterine device (n = 26) and the results compared to a historic group of women treated with per-oral gestagen (n = 31). In both treatment groups only patients with low risk (D score > 1) and uncertain risk (D score = 0-1) of cancer development were included. Endometrial specimens were investigated prior to treatment and after 3 months of therapy. The endometrial samples from the two groups were examined by light microscopy and objective data-based morphometry to assess tissue characteristics and to evaluate nuclear size variation.
After 3 months all patients treated with levonorgestrel intrauterine device showed regression of hyperplasia, whereas 14 of 31 patients in the per-oral group still had persisting disease. The objective morphometric analysis showed reduction in nuclear size for both treatment groups, including the D score > 1 as well as the D score 0-1 patients. However, the reduction was most obvious for the levonorgestrel intrauterine device-treated patients with initial D score of 0-1.
The present study indicates that levonorgestrel intrauterine device is a superior alternative to per oral treatment of endometrial hyperplasia. By using objective morphometric treatment monitoring we have shown that the hyperplasia patients with the highest malignant potential (D score = 0-1) were those taking most benefit from local high-dose levonorgestrel therapy.
基于主观(世界卫生组织标准)和客观(基于预后数据的形态计量学和体视学方法/D评分,预测每位患者癌症发生风险)评估,表明与口服孕激素治疗相比,左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器局部应用是治疗子宫内膜增生(EH)的更好疗法。
年龄在30至70岁之间、患有EH且D评分>0的女性接受左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器治疗(n = 26),并将结果与一组接受口服孕激素治疗的历史对照组女性(n = 31)进行比较。在两个治疗组中,仅纳入癌症发生风险低(D评分>1)和风险不确定(D评分= 0 - 1)的患者。在治疗前和治疗3个月后对子宫内膜标本进行研究。通过光学显微镜和基于客观数据的形态计量学检查两组的子宫内膜样本,以评估组织特征并评估核大小变化。
3个月后,所有接受左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器治疗的患者增生均消退,而口服组的31名患者中有14名仍患有持续性疾病。客观形态计量学分析显示,两个治疗组的核大小均减小,包括D评分>1以及D评分0 - 1的患者。然而,对于初始D评分为0 - 1的左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器治疗患者,核大小减小最为明显。
本研究表明,左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器是子宫内膜增生口服治疗的更佳替代方法。通过使用客观形态计量学治疗监测,我们表明恶性潜能最高(D评分= 0 - 1)的增生患者从局部高剂量左炔诺孕酮治疗中获益最大。