Suppr超能文献

自组装中协同性的评估。

Assessment of cooperativity in self-assembly.

作者信息

Ercolani Gianfranco

机构信息

Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Chimiche, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, 00133 Roma, Italy.

出版信息

J Am Chem Soc. 2003 Dec 24;125(51):16097-103. doi: 10.1021/ja038396c.

Abstract

A method has been proposed to assess cooperativity in self-assembly processes. The method is based on a clear distinction between intermolecular and intramolecular processes which are compared with the corresponding reference reactions. It has been applied to two classical cases, namely the self-assembly of helicates and of porphyrin ladders, by using data previously published by the groups of Lehn and Anderson, respectively. Contrarily to the conclusions of the authors, pointing out self-assembly processes driven by positive cooperativity, the method here presented indicates in both cases the absence of cooperative effects. The methods previously used to assess cooperativity, in particular Scatchard plot and/or Hill plot, are criticized as being inappropriate for self-assembly, because they are pertinent to a specific case only, namely the intermolecular binding of a monovalent ligand L to a multivalent receptor M, a case very different from self-assembly which involves both inter- and intramolecular interactions. The present method underscores the fact that positive cooperativity in artificial self-assembling systems is probably much more rare than it was previously thought.

摘要

有人提出了一种评估自组装过程中协同性的方法。该方法基于分子间和分子内过程的明确区分,并将其与相应的参考反应进行比较。通过分别使用莱恩小组和安德森小组先前发表的数据,该方法已应用于两个经典案例,即螺旋配合物和卟啉梯的自组装。与作者指出由正协同性驱动的自组装过程的结论相反,这里提出的方法表明在这两种情况下都不存在协同效应。以前用于评估协同性的方法,特别是斯卡查德图和/或希尔图,被批评不适用于自组装,因为它们仅适用于特定情况,即单价配体L与多价受体M的分子间结合,这与涉及分子间和分子内相互作用的自组装情况非常不同。本方法强调了这样一个事实,即人工自组装系统中的正协同性可能比以前认为的要罕见得多。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验