Hardeman Wim, Van Damme Wim, Van Pelt Maurits, Por Ir, Kimvan Heng, Meessen Bruno
Médecins sans Frontières, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Health Policy Plan. 2004 Jan;19(1):22-32. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czh003.
User fees in health services are a source of much debate because of their potential risk of negative effects on access to health care for the poor. A Health Equity Fund that identifies the poor and pays on their behalf may be an alternative to generally ineffective fee exemption policies. This paper presents the experience of such a Health Equity Fund, managed by a local non-governmental organization, in Sotnikum, Cambodia. It describes the results of the first 2 years of operations, investigates the constraints to equitable access to the district hospital and the effects of the Health Equity Fund on these constraints. The Health Equity Fund supported 16% of hospitalized patients. We found four major constraints to access: financial, geographical, informational and intra-household. The results of the study show that the Health Equity Fund effectively improves financial access for the poor, but that the poor continue to face many constraints for timely access. The study also found that the Health Equity Fund as set up in Sotnikum was very cost-effective, with minimal leakage to non-poor. Health Equity Funds managed by a local non-governmental organization seem to constitute a promising channel for donors who want to invest in poverty reduction. However, further research and experimentation are recommended in different contexts and with different set-ups.
医疗卫生服务中的使用者付费因可能对穷人获得医疗保健产生负面影响而备受争议。设立一个甄别穷人并为其代付费用的卫生公平基金,或许可以替代普遍无效的费用豁免政策。本文介绍了由当地一个非政府组织管理的此类卫生公平基金在柬埔寨索特尼库姆的经验。它描述了头两年的运作结果,调查了公平获得地区医院服务的制约因素以及卫生公平基金对这些制约因素的影响。卫生公平基金资助了16%的住院患者。我们发现了获得服务的四大制约因素:经济、地理、信息和家庭内部因素。研究结果表明,卫生公平基金有效改善了穷人的经济可及性,但穷人在及时获得服务方面仍面临许多制约因素。研究还发现,索特尼库姆设立的卫生公平基金性价比很高,极少惠及非贫困人口。由当地非政府组织管理的卫生公平基金似乎为希望投资减贫的捐助者提供了一个有前景的渠道。然而,建议在不同背景和不同设置下进行进一步的研究和试验。