Gurfinkel Enrique P, Leon de la Fuente Ricardo, Mendiz Oscar, Mautner Branco
Foundation Favaloro, Av. Belgrano 1746 (1093), Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eur Heart J. 2004 Jan;25(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.10.018.
We have previously reported a significant benefit of vaccination against flu on the incidence of a single and composite end-point of death, myocardial infarction or recurrent ischaemia in patients with myocardial necrosis and planned percutaneous coronary interventions. To determine whether the observed benefits of vaccination against flu were maintained beyond the winter season a 1-year follow-up was conducted.
During the winter season, we enrolled prospectively 200 myocardial infarction patients admitted in the first 72 h, and 101 planned angioplasty/stent patients (PCI) without unstable coronary artery disease, prior by-pass surgery, angioplasty or tissue necrosis. Only four patients failed to meet the inclusion criteria. Participants were randomly allocated to receive flu vaccination or remain unvaccinated on top of standard medication (control group). The study was conducted in hospitalized patients with the aim to test the potential beneficial effect of flu vaccination in a secondary prevention scenario. Under intention to treat analysis the incidence of the primary end-point cardiovascular death at 1 year was significantly lower among patients receiving vaccination, 6% as compared with controls, 17% (relative risk with vaccine as compared with controls, 0.34; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17 to 0.71; P=0.002). The triple composite end-point occurred in 22% of the patients in the vaccine group vs 37% in controls, hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.86) P=0.004. The beneficial effect was mainly detected in acute myocardial infarction patients (four events in the active arm vs 21 in the control group, P=0.0002 [95% CI 0.19, 0.07-0.53]), and Cox regression analyses revealed that there was a greater benefit with flu vaccination in patients at high risk according with the TIMI score, and those with non-ST-segment deviation myocardial infarction (95% CI: 0.13 [0.03-0.52])
Influenza vaccination may reduce the risk of death and ischaemic events in patients suffering from infarction and post-angioplasty during flu season. This effect was significantly evident at 1-year follow-up. Larger confirmatory studies are needed to evaluate the real impact on flu vaccination on outcome after acute coronary syndromes.
我们之前曾报道,对于心肌坏死且计划进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者,接种流感疫苗对单一及复合终点(死亡、心肌梗死或复发性缺血)的发生率有显著益处。为确定接种流感疫苗所观察到的益处是否能在冬季之后持续存在,我们进行了为期1年的随访。
在冬季,我们前瞻性纳入了200例在发病72小时内入院的心肌梗死患者,以及101例计划进行血管成形术/支架置入术(PCI)且无不稳定冠状动脉疾病、既往未行搭桥手术、血管成形术或组织坏死的患者。仅有4例患者不符合纳入标准。参与者被随机分配接受流感疫苗接种或在标准药物治疗基础上不接种疫苗(对照组)。该研究在住院患者中进行,旨在测试流感疫苗接种在二级预防情况下的潜在有益效果。在意向性分析中,接种疫苗的患者1年时主要终点心血管死亡的发生率显著较低,为6%,而对照组为17%(疫苗组与对照组的相对风险为0.34;95%置信区间(CI),0.17至0.71;P = 0.002)。三联复合终点在疫苗组22%的患者中出现,而对照组为37%,风险比为0.59,95% CI为0.4至0.86,P = 0.004。有益效果主要在急性心肌梗死患者中检测到(治疗组有4例事件,对照组有21例,P = 0.0002 [95% CI 0.19, 0.07 - 0.53]),并且Cox回归分析显示,根据TIMI评分处于高危的患者以及非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接种流感疫苗有更大益处(95% CI:0.13 [0.03 - 0.52])。
流感疫苗接种可能降低流感季节心肌梗死和血管成形术后患者的死亡风险和缺血事件风险。这种效果在1年随访时显著明显。需要更大规模的验证性研究来评估流感疫苗接种对急性冠状动脉综合征后结局的实际影响。