Suppr超能文献

基于物体和基于空间的注意偏向对于自由观看时的感知不对称都很重要吗?

Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries?

作者信息

Nicholls Michael E R, Hughes Georgina, Mattingley Jason B, Bradshaw John L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne, 3010, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2004 Feb;154(4):513-20. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1688-x. Epub 2003 Dec 18.

Abstract

In contrast to unilateral neglect patients, who overattend to the right hemispace, normal participants attend more to the left: a phenomenon known as pseudoneglect. Two experiments examined whether pseudoneglect results from object- or space-based attentional biases. Normal participants ( n=38, 22) made luminance judgments for two left/right mirror-reversed luminance gradients (greyscales task). The relative lateral position of the greyscales stimuli was manipulated so that object- and space-based coordinates were congruent or incongruent. A baseline condition was also included. A leftward bias, found for the baseline condition, was annulled in the incongruent condition, demonstrating an opposition of object- and space-based biases. The leftward bias was reduced in the congruent condition where object- and space-based biases were expected to be additive. This effect was attributed to extraneous factors, which were avoided in the second experiment by presenting the greyscales stimuli sequentially. Once again, no bias was observed in the incongruent condition where object- and space-based biases were opposed. The leftward bias in the congruent condition was the same as the baseline. The results can be explained by a combination of space- and object-based biases or by space-based biases alone and are discussed with reference to a variety of models, which describe the distribution of attention across space.

摘要

与单侧忽视患者过度关注右侧半空间不同,正常参与者更多地关注左侧:这一现象被称为假性忽视。两项实验研究了假性忽视是由基于物体还是基于空间的注意力偏差导致的。正常参与者(n = 38, 22)对两个左右镜像反转的亮度梯度进行亮度判断(灰度任务)。操纵灰度刺激的相对横向位置,以使基于物体和基于空间的坐标一致或不一致。还包括一个基线条件。在基线条件下发现的向左偏差在不一致条件下被消除,表明基于物体和基于空间的偏差相互对立。在预期基于物体和基于空间的偏差会相加的一致条件下,向左偏差减小。这种效应归因于外部因素,在第二个实验中通过依次呈现灰度刺激避免了这些因素。再次,在基于物体和基于空间的偏差相互对立的不一致条件下未观察到偏差。一致条件下的向左偏差与基线相同。结果可以通过基于空间和基于物体的偏差的组合来解释,也可以仅通过基于空间的偏差来解释,并参考各种描述注意力在空间中分布的模型进行了讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验