Suppr超能文献

棱镜适应并不能改变单侧忽略患者在模糊刺激下发现的右向空间偏好偏差。

Prism adaptation does not change the rightward spatial preference bias found with ambiguous stimuli in unilateral neglect.

机构信息

MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Cortex. 2011 Mar;47(3):353-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.01.006. Epub 2010 Jan 21.

Abstract

Previous research has shown that prism adaptation (prism adaptation) can ameliorate several symptoms of spatial neglect after right-hemisphere damage. But the mechanisms behind this remain unclear. Recently we reported that prisms may increase leftward awareness for neglect in a task using chimeric visual objects, despite apparently not affecting awareness in a task using chimeric emotional faces (Sarri et al., 2006). Here we explored potential reasons for this apparent discrepancy in outcome, by testing further whether the lack of a prism effect on the chimeric face task task could be explained by: i) the specific category of stimuli used (faces as opposed to objects); ii) the affective nature of the stimuli; and/or iii) the particular task implemented, with the chimeric face task requiring forced-choice judgements of lateral 'preference' between pairs of identical, but left/right mirror-reversed chimeric face tasks (as opposed to identification for the chimeric object task). We replicated our previous pattern of no impact of prisms on the emotional chimeric face task here in a new series of patients, while also similarly finding no beneficial impact on another lateral 'preference' measure that used non-face non-emotional stimuli, namely greyscale gradients. By contrast, we found the usual beneficial impact of prism adaptation (prism adaptation) on some conventional measures of neglect, and improvements for at least some patients in a different face task, requiring explicit discrimination of the chimeric or non-chimeric nature of face stimuli. The new findings indicate that prism therapy does not alter spatial biases in neglect as revealed by 'lateral preference tasks' that have no right or wrong answer (requiring forced-choice judgements on left/right mirror-reversed stimuli), regardless of whether these employ face or non-face stimuli. But our data also show that prism therapy can beneficially modulate some aspects of visual awareness in spatial neglect not only for objects, but also for face stimuli, in some cases.

摘要

先前的研究表明,棱镜适应(prism adaptation)可以改善右半球损伤后空间忽视的几种症状。但是,其背后的机制尚不清楚。最近,我们报告说,尽管棱镜在使用混合视觉物体的任务中似乎不会影响意识,但棱镜可能会增加对忽视的左向意识(Sarri 等人,2006 年)。在这里,我们通过进一步测试棱镜对混合面部任务是否缺乏影响,是否可以解释为:i)使用的刺激物特定类别(物体而不是面部);ii)刺激物的情感性质;和/或 iii)实施的特定任务,与需要对相同的但左右镜像反转的混合面部任务之间的侧“偏好”进行强制选择判断的混合面部任务(与混合对象任务的识别相反)。我们在一系列新的患者中复制了我们之前的研究结果,即棱镜对情绪混合面部任务没有影响,同时也发现棱镜对另一种侧“偏好”测量没有有益的影响,该测量使用非面部非情感刺激,即灰度梯度。相比之下,我们发现棱镜适应(prism adaptation)对一些常规的忽视测量有通常的有益影响,并且对于至少一些患者在需要明确区分混合或非混合面部刺激的不同面部任务中也有改善。新发现表明,棱镜疗法不会改变由没有正确或错误答案的“侧偏任务”(对左右镜像反转的刺激进行强制选择判断)揭示的忽视空间偏见,无论这些任务使用面部还是非面部刺激。但是,我们的数据还表明,棱镜疗法不仅可以使物体的空间忽视的某些方面,而且还可以使某些情况下的面部刺激的某些方面的视觉意识得到有益的调节。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81cd/3034025/2014ebdf6dc1/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Prism adaptation does not change the rightward spatial preference bias found with ambiguous stimuli in unilateral neglect.
Cortex. 2011 Mar;47(3):353-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.01.006. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
3
Simulating unilateral neglect in normals using prism adaptation: implications for theory.
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(1):25-39. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00135-5.
4
Prism adaptation aftereffects in stroke patients with spatial neglect: pathological effects on subjective straight ahead but not visual open-loop pointing.
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Mar 7;46(4):1069-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.005. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
5
Prism adaptation enhances activity of intact fronto-parietal areas in both hemispheres in neglect patients.
Cortex. 2013 Jan;49(1):107-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.009. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
6
Prism adaptation improves visual search in hemispatial neglect.
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):717-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.026. Epub 2008 Nov 30.
7
Prism adaptation magnitude has differential influences on perceptual versus manual responses.
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Oct;234(10):2761-72. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4678-5. Epub 2016 May 20.
8
Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation.
Brain. 2002 Mar;125(Pt 3):608-23. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf056.
9
Generalization of prism adaptation for wheelchair driving task in patients with unilateral spatial neglect.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Mar;91(3):443-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.027.

引用本文的文献

1
Prism adaptation speeds reach initiation in the direction of the prism after-effect.
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Oct;235(10):3193-3206. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5038-9. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
2
Beyond the Sensorimotor Plasticity: Cognitive Expansion of Prism Adaptation in Healthy Individuals.
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 5;6:1979. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01979. eCollection 2015.
3
Using brain potentials to understand prism adaptation: the error-related negativity and the P300.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jun 12;9:335. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00335. eCollection 2015.
4
Modelling the differential effects of prisms on perception and action in neglect.
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Mar;233(3):751-66. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4150-3. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
5
Prismatic adaptation changes visuospatial representation in the inferior parietal lobule.
J Neurosci. 2014 Aug 27;34(35):11803-11. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3184-13.2014.
7
Spatial working memory deficits represent a core challenge for rehabilitating neglect.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 27;7:334. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00334. Print 2013.
8
The influence of prism adaptation on perceptual and motor components of neglect: a reply to saevarsson and kristjansson.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 5;7:255. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00255. eCollection 2013.
9
Eye movements and verbal report in a single case of visual neglect.
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043743. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
10
Prism adaptation for spatial neglect after stroke: translational practice gaps.
Nat Rev Neurol. 2012 Oct;8(10):567-77. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.170. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Inappropriate usage of the Brunner-Munzel test in recent voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping studies.
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(1):341-3. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.016.
2
Effectiveness of prism adaptation in neglect rehabilitation: a controlled trial study.
Stroke. 2009 Apr;40(4):1392-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.530485. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
3
Prism adaptation overcomes pseudoneglect for the greyscales task.
Cortex. 2009 Apr;45(4):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.12.011. Epub 2008 Mar 2.
4
Prism adaptation improves visual search in hemispatial neglect.
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):717-25. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.026. Epub 2008 Nov 30.
5
The disengage deficit in hemispatial neglect is restricted to between-object shifts and is abolished by prism adaptation.
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jan;192(3):499-510. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1585-4. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
6
Abnormal attentional modulation of retinotopic cortex in parietal patients with spatial neglect.
Curr Biol. 2008 Oct 14;18(19):1525-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.08.072.
7
Task-related modulation of visual neglect in cancellation tasks.
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jan;47(1):91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.020. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
9
Wheel-chair driving improvement following visuo-manual prism adaptation.
Cortex. 2008 Jan;44(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2006.06.003. Epub 2007 Nov 17.
10
Prism adaptation improves voluntary but not automatic orienting in neglect.
Neuroreport. 2008 Feb 12;19(3):293-8. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f4cb67.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验