Stock Armin, Stock Claudia
Institute of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Germany.
Psychol Res. 2004 Apr;68(2-3):176-88. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0154-5. Epub 2003 Dec 18.
The ideo-motor theory, which is currently receiving heightened interest in cognitive psychology, looks back on a long history. Essentially two historical roots can be presented. A British one, initiated by Laycock (1845) and Carpenter (1852), which was developed in order to explain ideo-motor phenomena by means of cerebral reflex actions. A second and older root is the German one by Herbart (1816, 1825), Lotze (1852), and Harless (1861), which considered the ideo-motor principle a fundamental mechanism of all intentional human behaviour. Both roots converged in James' (1890) Principles of Psychology before they fell into oblivion due to the dominance of behaviorism in the first half of the 20th century. The few empirical ideo-motor studies of the early 20th century are briefly described. Finally, similarities and differences in the history of the ideo-motor theory are delineated and a perspective is given covering research questions that could be examined in the future.
观念运动理论目前在认知心理学中受到越来越多的关注,其历史悠久。本质上可以追溯到两个历史根源。一个是英国根源,由莱科克(1845年)和卡彭特(1852年)发起,旨在通过大脑反射行为来解释观念运动现象。另一个更古老的根源是德国根源,由赫尔巴特(1816年、1825年)、洛采(1852年)和哈勒斯(1861年)提出,他们认为观念运动原则是人类所有有意行为的基本机制。这两个根源在詹姆斯(1890年)的《心理学原理》中汇合,之后由于20世纪上半叶行为主义的主导地位而被遗忘。文中简要描述了20世纪早期的一些实证性观念运动研究。最后,阐述了观念运动理论历史中的异同,并给出了一个关于未来可研究问题的展望。