• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

配对的性别构成会影响联合行动效果。

Gender composition of pairs influences joint action effect.

作者信息

Fabbri Marco, Martoni Monica, Beracci Alessia, Tonetti Lorenzo, Natale Vincenzo

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Caserta, Italy.

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1122427. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122427. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122427
PMID:36910794
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9996039/
Abstract

Research on joint action has demonstrated that individuals are sensitive to a coactor's attentional relation to jointly attend stimuli. It has also been suggested that some features are necessary to resolve the discrimination problem (i.e., self-own and other-own actions). In the present study, we aimed to test whether the gender composition of interacting pairs modulated the joint action effect. Same- (female-female or male-male) and mixed- (female-male) gender pairs performed a joint version of flanker tasks in Experiment 1 (90 participants, 50% males), while in Experiment 2 (154 participants, 50% males) Navon tasks were performed. In Experiment 1, a higher joint flanker effect in same-gender pairs than in mixed-gender pairs, and this joint effect was similar to the classical flanker effect reported by males and females in a classical procedure of the task (70 participants, 50% males). In Experiment 2, the same-gender pairs reported a joint Navon effect, which was reversed in mixed-gender pairs. In conclusion, our findings support how the gender composition of interacting pairs plays a role in joint attentional tasks.

摘要

关于联合行动的研究表明,个体对共同行动者与共同关注刺激之间的注意关系很敏感。也有人提出,一些特征对于解决辨别问题(即自我的和他人的行动)是必要的。在本研究中,我们旨在测试互动对子的性别构成是否会调节联合行动效应。在实验1(90名参与者,50%为男性)中,同性(女性-女性或男性-男性)和混合性(女性-男性)对子进行了侧翼任务的联合版本,而在实验2(154名参与者,50%为男性)中进行了纳冯任务。在实验1中,同性对子的联合侧翼效应高于混合性对子,并且这种联合效应类似于在该任务的经典程序中男性和女性所报告的经典侧翼效应(70名参与者,50%为男性)。在实验2中,同性对子报告了联合纳冯效应,而在混合性对子中则相反。总之,我们的研究结果支持了互动对子的性别构成在联合注意任务中所起的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/344f/9996039/df60222ab238/fpsyg-14-1122427-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/344f/9996039/72c143a0919d/fpsyg-14-1122427-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/344f/9996039/df60222ab238/fpsyg-14-1122427-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/344f/9996039/72c143a0919d/fpsyg-14-1122427-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/344f/9996039/df60222ab238/fpsyg-14-1122427-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender composition of pairs influences joint action effect.配对的性别构成会影响联合行动效果。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1122427. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122427. eCollection 2023.
2
Effects of a coactor's focus of attention on task performance.协作者注意力焦点对任务表现的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Dec;38(6):1404-15. doi: 10.1037/a0027523. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
3
Synchrony effect on joint attention.同步性对共同注意的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Aug;235(8):2449-2462. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4984-6. Epub 2017 May 16.
4
Influence of time-of-day on joint Navon effect.一天中的时间对联合纳冯效应的影响。
Cogn Process. 2018 Feb;19(1):27-40. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0849-y. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
5
Joint response-effect compatibility.关节反应-效应兼容性
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Jun;21(3):817-22. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0528-7.
6
Co-representation of others' task constraints in joint action.联合行动中对他人任务限制的共同表征。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Aug;43(8):1480-1493. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000403. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
7
The joint flanker effect: less social than previously thought.联合侧翼效应:不如先前认为的那么具有社会性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Oct;21(5):1224-30. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0583-8.
8
The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors.共同动作突显性:与真实和想象中的共同执行者共同完成任务。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):371-85. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2709-9. Epub 2011 May 15.
9
Theory of mind and joint action in Parkinson's disease.心智理论与帕金森病中的共同行动
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec;18(6):1320-1337. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0642-0.
10
[Inhibition and resource capacity during normal aging: a confrontation of the dorsal-ventral and frontal models in a modified version of negative priming].正常衰老过程中的抑制与资源容量:在负启动修正版中背腹侧模型与额叶模型的对比
Encephale. 2006 Mar-Apr;32(2 Pt 1):253-62. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76152-8.

引用本文的文献

1
How a co-actor's (Un-) reliability modulates goal selection in a novel joint goal-setting paradigm.共同行动者的(不可靠性)如何调节新颖的共同目标设定范式中的目标选择。
Psychol Res. 2024 Nov 15;89(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02056-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Theory of mind and joint action in Parkinson's disease.心智理论与帕金森病中的共同行动
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec;18(6):1320-1337. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0642-0.
2
The gist and details of sex differences in cognition and the brain: How parallels in sex differences across domains are shaped by the locus coeruleus and catecholamine systems.认知和大脑中性别差异的要点和细节:蓝斑和儿茶酚胺系统如何塑造不同领域性别差异的相似性。
Prog Neurobiol. 2019 May;176:120-133. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 19.
3
Influence of time-of-day on joint Navon effect.
一天中的时间对联合纳冯效应的影响。
Cogn Process. 2018 Feb;19(1):27-40. doi: 10.1007/s10339-017-0849-y. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
4
It's not me, it's you - Differential neural processing of social and non-social nogo cues in joint action.不是我,是你——联合行动中社交与非社交停止信号的差异神经处理
Soc Neurosci. 2019 Feb;14(1):114-124. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2017.1403374. Epub 2017 Nov 12.
5
Action-effect sharing induces task-set sharing in joint task switching.动作-效应共享在联合任务切换中会引发任务集共享。
Cognition. 2017 Aug;165:113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.022. Epub 2017 May 20.
6
Synchrony effect on joint attention.同步性对共同注意的影响。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Aug;235(8):2449-2462. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-4984-6. Epub 2017 May 16.
7
The joint flanker effect and the joint Simon effect: On the comparability of processes underlying joint compatibility effects.联合侧翼效应与联合西蒙效应:关于联合兼容性效应背后过程的可比性
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Sep;70(9):1808-1823. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1207690. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
8
Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention.西蒙任务中的性别差异有助于解释选择性注意中的性别差异。
Psychol Res. 2017 May;81(3):571-581. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0763-4. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
9
Individual differences in action co-representation: not personal distress or subclinical psychotic experiences but sex composition modulates joint action performance.动作共同表征中的个体差异:并非个人痛苦或亚临床精神病体验,而是性别构成调节联合动作表现。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Feb;234(2):499-510. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4475-6. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
10
The Influence of Social and Nonsocial Variables on the Simon Effect.社会和非社会变量对西蒙效应的影响。
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(4):215-31. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000292. Epub 2015 Jan 1.