Brooks Anthony G, Withers Robert T, Gore Christopher J, Vogler Andrew J, Plummer John, Cormack John
Exercise Physiology Laboratory, School of Education, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, delaide, South Australia, Australia 5001.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 May;91(5-6):638-48. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-1018-9. Epub 2003 Dec 18.
This study determined whether four self-paced household tasks, conducted in the subjects' homes and a standardised laboratory environment, were performed at a moderate intensity [3-6 metabolic equivalents (METs)] in a representative sample of thirty-six 35- to 45-year-old females. Energy expenditure was also predicted via indirect methods. Self-paced energy expenditure during sweeping, window cleaning, vacuuming and mowing was measured using the Douglas bag technique. Heart rate, respiratory frequency, Computer Science Applications (CSA) movement counts (hip and wrist), Borg rating of perceived exertion and Quetelet's index were also recorded as potential predictors of energy expenditure. While the four activities were performed at mean intensities >or=3.0 METs in both the home and laboratory, all comparisons between these two environments were statistically significant ( P<0.001). The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the home and laboratory prediction equations were +/-1.1 METs and +/-1.0 MET, respectively. These data suggest that the aforementioned household chores can contribute to the 30 min x day(-1) of moderate-intensity activity required to confer health benefits. However, the substantial between-subject variability in energy expenditure resulted in some persons performing these tasks at a light intensity (<3.0 METs). The significant MET differences between the home and laboratory emphasise the effects of 'environment and terrain' and the 'mental approach to a task' on self-paced energy expenditure. Considering the means for the five activities ranged from 3.1 METs to 6.0 METs, the 95% CIs for the regression equations lack predictive precision.
本研究确定了在36名35至45岁女性的代表性样本中,在受试者家中和标准化实验室环境中进行的四项自主节奏的家务任务是否以中等强度[3 - 6代谢当量(METs)]进行。还通过间接方法预测了能量消耗。使用道格拉斯袋技术测量扫地、擦窗、吸尘和割草过程中的自主节奏能量消耗。心率、呼吸频率、计算机科学应用(CSA)运动计数(髋部和腕部)、伯格主观用力程度分级和克托莱指数也被记录为能量消耗的潜在预测指标。虽然这四项活动在家庭和实验室中的平均强度均≥3.0 METs,但这两种环境之间的所有比较均具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。家庭和实验室预测方程的95%置信区间(CIs)分别为±1.1 METs和±1.0 MET。这些数据表明,上述家务劳动有助于达到每天30分钟的中等强度活动,从而带来健康益处。然而,受试者之间能量消耗的显著差异导致一些人以轻度强度(<3.0 METs)执行这些任务。家庭和实验室之间MET的显著差异强调了“环境和地形”以及“对任务的心理态度”对自主节奏能量消耗的影响。考虑到这五项活动的平均值范围为3.1 METs至6.0 METs,回归方程的95% CIs缺乏预测精度。