Hasnain-Wynia Romana, Sofaer Shoshanna, Bazzoli Gloria J, Alexander Jeffrey A, Shortell Stephen M, Conrad Douglas A, Chan Benjamin, Zukoski Ann P, Sweney Jane
Health Research and Educational Trust.
Med Care Res Rev. 2003 Dec;60(4 Suppl):40S-62S. doi: 10.1177/1077558703260272.
Investment in voluntary partnerships raises important questions: Should we invest in collaboration in moving toward the goals of health system redesign? What makes collaborative groups effective? Given the voluntary nature of these partnerships, membership perceptions of their experiences and the partnership's effectiveness should be important predictors of success. This article provides a preliminary analyses of perceived effectiveness of participants' perceptions of their own partnership, particularly focusing on leadership, conflict management, decision-making dynamics, and the breadth and depth of partnership membership. Members' perceptions that the partnership membership was "sufficiently broad to accomplish objectives" had a negative and highly significant relationship to perceived effectiveness. Members' perceptions about leadership being ethical was positively related to perceived effectiveness while perceptions that the leadership was not effective a keeping the group focused was negatively related to perceived effectiveness.
我们是否应该投资于为实现卫生系统重新设计目标而开展的合作?是什么让合作团体发挥效力?鉴于这些合作关系的自愿性质,成员对自身经历以及合作关系有效性的看法应是成功的重要预测因素。本文对参与者对其自身合作关系的感知有效性进行了初步分析,尤其关注领导力、冲突管理、决策动态以及合作关系成员的广度和深度。成员认为合作关系成员“足够广泛以实现目标”的看法与感知有效性呈负相关且具有高度显著性。成员认为领导力合乎道德与感知有效性呈正相关,而认为领导力在使团体专注方面无效则与感知有效性呈负相关。