• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TNM 分类的持续改进过程。

The process for continuous improvement of the TNM classification.

作者信息

Gospodarowicz Mary K, Miller Daniel, Groome Patti A, Greene Frederick L, Logan Pamela A, Sobin Leslie H

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Cancer. 2004 Jan 1;100(1):1-5. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11898.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.11898
PMID:14692017
Abstract

The TNM classification is a worldwide benchmark for reporting the extent of malignant disease and is a major prognostic factor in predicting the outcome of patients with cancer. The objectives for cancer staging were defined by the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM Committee almost 50 years ago and are still broadly applicable today. To keep pace with the modern demands of evidence-based practice, the UICC introduced a structured process for introducing changes to the TNM classification. The elements of the TNM process were determined to include the development of unambiguous criteria for the information and documentation required to consider changes in the classification, establishment of a well-defined process for the annual review of relevant literature, formation of site-specific expert panels, and the participation of experts from all over the world in the TNM review process. Communication between the oncology community and those involved in the TNM classification was established as being essential to the success of the process. The process, which was introduced in 2002, will be tested over the next 3-4 years and evaluated. In addition to the formal process, individual initiative, involvement by the national staging committees, and group consensus are required. Furthermore, increased involvement by the experts should improve the understanding and dissemination of the TNM classification.

摘要

TNM 分类是报告恶性疾病范围的全球基准,也是预测癌症患者预后的主要预后因素。癌症分期的目标大约在 50 年前由国际抗癌联盟(UICC)TNM 委员会确定,至今仍广泛适用。为了跟上循证医学实践的现代需求,UICC 引入了一个结构化流程来对 TNM 分类进行修订。TNM 流程的要素包括制定明确的标准,以确定考虑分类变更所需的信息和文件;建立明确的年度相关文献审查流程;组建特定部位的专家小组;以及让世界各地的专家参与 TNM 审查过程。肿瘤学界与参与 TNM 分类的人员之间的沟通被认为是该流程成功的关键。该流程于 2002 年推出,将在未来 3 - 4 年进行测试和评估。除了正式流程外,还需要个人的主动性、国家分期委员会的参与以及团体共识。此外,专家更多的参与应能增进对 TNM 分类的理解和传播。

相似文献

1
The process for continuous improvement of the TNM classification.TNM 分类的持续改进过程。
Cancer. 2004 Jan 1;100(1):1-5. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11898.
2
Evidence-based medicine: the time has come to set standards for staging.循证医学:制定分期标准的时机已经成熟。
J Pathol. 2010 Aug;221(4):357-60. doi: 10.1002/path.2720.
3
[1992 tumor classification/developments].[1992年肿瘤分类/进展]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1992:40-5.
4
TNM: evolution and relation to other prognostic factors.TNM分期:演变及其与其他预后因素的关系。
Semin Surg Oncol. 2003;21(1):3-7. doi: 10.1002/ssu.10014.
5
Improving the TNM classification: findings from a 10-year continuous literature review.改进 TNM 分类:基于 10 年连续文献回顾的发现。
Int J Cancer. 2014 Jul 15;135(2):371-8. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28683.
6
History and international developments in cancer staging.癌症分期的历史与国际发展
Cancer Prev Control. 1998 Dec;2(6):262-8.
7
[Proposals for revisions of UICC TNM system (1997)--breast cancer].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1998 Jun;25(7):1087-93.
8
Lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer: comparison of Union International Contra Cancer and Japanese systems.胃癌的淋巴结转移:国际抗癌联盟(UICC)和日本系统的比较。
ANZ J Surg. 2004 Oct;74(10):852-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03188.x.
9
Eighth Edition of the UICC Classification of Malignant Tumours: an overview of the changes in the pathological TNM classification criteria-What has changed and why?第八版 UICC 恶性肿瘤分类:病理 TNM 分类标准变化概述——有哪些变化,为什么?
Virchows Arch. 2018 Apr;472(4):519-531. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2276-y. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
10
[Tumor classification--present status and further developments].[肿瘤分类——现状与进一步发展]
Fortschr Med. 1989 Dec 10;107(35):757-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Thyroid Cancer Staging: Historical Evolution and Analysis From Macrocarcinoma to Microcarcinoma.甲状腺癌分期:从大体癌到微小癌的历史演变与分析
Cureus. 2025 Apr 9;17(4):e81972. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81972. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
A nomogram to predict postoperative overall and cancer specific survival in patients with primary parotid squamous cell carcinoma: a population based study.预测原发性腮腺鳞状细胞癌患者术后总体生存率和癌症特异性生存率的列线图:一项基于人群的研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 25;15(1):6774. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90480-8.
3
Advances in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Staging: from the 7th to the 9th Edition of the TNM System and Future Outlook.
鼻咽癌分期的进展:从第7版到第9版TNM系统及未来展望
Curr Oncol Rep. 2025 Mar;27(3):322-332. doi: 10.1007/s11912-025-01651-9. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
4
A machine learning clinic scoring system for hepatocellular carcinoma based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.一种基于监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库的肝细胞癌机器学习临床评分系统。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Jun 30;15(3):1082-1100. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-230. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
5
Development and evaluation of nomograms and risk stratification systems to predict the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.开发和评估列线图和风险分层系统,以预测肝细胞癌患者的总生存率和癌症特异性生存率。
Clin Exp Med. 2024 Feb 28;24(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s10238-024-01296-1.
6
Evolution of TNM Classification for Clinical Staging of Oral Cancer: The Past, Present and the Future.口腔癌临床分期的TNM分类演变:过去、现在与未来
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Sep;22(3):710-719. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01915-6. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
7
Should Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma and Pathological Nodal Invasion Be Classified As Having Stage IV Disease?肾细胞癌伴病理性淋巴结转移患者应被归类为Ⅳ期疾病吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;30(8):5286-5294. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12979-y. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
8
From past to future: Bibliometric analysis of global research productivity on nomogram (2000-2021).从过去到未来:全球nomogram 研究生产力的文献计量分析(2000-2021 年)。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 20;10:997713. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.997713. eCollection 2022.
9
The usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of gallbladder lesions.内镜超声在胆囊病变诊断中的应用价值。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 29;9:957557. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.957557. eCollection 2022.
10
Nationwide Validation of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM Staging System and Five Proposed Modifications for Resected Pancreatic Cancer.全国范围内验证第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会 TNM 分期系统和 5 项针对可切除胰腺癌的修改建议。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep;29(9):5988-5999. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11664-4. Epub 2022 Apr 25.