Anderson Debra Gay, Rayens Mary Kay
College of Nursing, Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0232, USA.
Public Health Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;21(1):12-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2004.21103.x.
The specific aims of the article were to: (i) compare childhood experiences of intimacy and autonomy as they occurred in the families of origin of women who have and women who have not experienced homelessness; (ii) compare social support, reciprocity, and conflict as they occurred in the childhood support networks and in the current support networks of women who have and women who have not experienced homelessness; (iii) examine the relationships between intimacy and autonomy in families of origin and the social support networks from childhood of women who have and women who have not experienced homelessness. Descriptive correlational design: 255 women were interviewed to determine levels of intimacy, autonomy, social support, reciprocity, and conflict in childhood relationships. The ANCOVA models for each of support, reciprocity, and conflict indicated a significant group effect. The post-hoc analysis for support indicated that the homeless group was significantly lower in support and reciprocity and significantly higher in conflict than the never-homeless groups. The never-homeless, never-abused group scored significantly higher on autonomy and intimacy than the homeless or the never-homeless, abused groups. This study demonstrates the significance of families of origin and learning how to develop and utilize support systems in preventing or reducing homelessness.
（i）比较有过无家可归经历和没有无家可归经历的女性原生家庭中亲密感和自主性的童年经历；（ii）比较有过无家可归经历和没有无家可归经历的女性童年支持网络和当前支持网络中的社会支持、互惠性和冲突；（iii）研究有过无家可归经历和没有无家可归经历的女性原生家庭中的亲密感和自主性与童年社会支持网络之间的关系。描述性相关设计：对255名女性进行访谈，以确定童年关系中亲密感、自主性、社会支持、互惠性和冲突的程度。支持、互惠性和冲突的每个协方差分析模型均显示出显著的组效应。支持方面的事后分析表明，无家可归组在支持和互惠性方面显著低于从未无家可归组，在冲突方面显著高于从未无家可归组。从未无家可归、从未遭受虐待的组在自主性和亲密感方面的得分显著高于无家可归组或从未无家可归、遭受虐待的组。本研究证明了原生家庭以及学习如何发展和利用支持系统在预防或减少无家可归方面的重要性。
