• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

客户优势、兴趣和目标评估的进一步验证。

Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals.

作者信息

Lecomte Tania, Wallace Charles J, Caron Jean, Perreault Michel, Lecomte Jocelin

机构信息

University of British Columbia, VGH Research Pavilion, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1L8.

出版信息

Schizophr Res. 2004 Jan 1;66(1):59-70. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(02)00496-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0920-9964(02)00496-6
PMID:14693353
Abstract

The Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals (CASIG), a measure that assesses the treatment outcomes of individuals with serious and persistent mental illness, has previously shown adequate psychometric properties with an American sample. Since it assesses quite specific skills and needs, it is necessary to assess its cultural relevance and psychometric characteristics before using it in a different country. Hence, the purposes of this study were to (1) adapt CASIG to the culture of a Canadian setting and translate its items and directions into French, (2) determine the psychometric characteristics of the adapted English and French versions of CASIG, and (3) identify its latent constructs via an exploratory factor analysis. The CASIG self-report (CASIG-SR) measure was administered to 224 consumers living in the community, and the CASIG informant (CASIG-I) measure to 31 clinicians answering for 172 consumers. The participating consumers also completed the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-32 (BASIS-32), the Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36), and the Camberwell Assessment of Needs (CAN). The informants also completed the clinician version of the CAN. The CASIG-SR and the CASIG-I had adequate internal consistency, test-retest, and interrater reliabilities. Correlations of the consumers' and informants' results with the BASIS-32, SF-36, and CAN provided evidence of convergent and discriminant validity, as did contrasts between higher and lower functioning community consumers. The factor analysis also supports the construct validity of the assessment. The results confirm the psychometric adequacy of the adapted and translated CASIG in Canada.

摘要

客户优势、兴趣和目标评估量表(CASIG)是一种用于评估患有严重持续性精神疾病个体治疗效果的工具,此前在美国样本中已显示出足够的心理测量学特性。由于它评估的是非常具体的技能和需求,因此在不同国家使用之前,有必要评估其文化相关性和心理测量学特征。因此,本研究的目的是:(1)使CASIG适用于加拿大环境的文化,并将其项目和说明翻译成法语;(2)确定改编后的英语和法语版CASIG的心理测量学特征;(3)通过探索性因素分析确定其潜在结构。对224名社区消费者施测了CASIG自评量表(CASIG-SR),对为172名消费者作答的31名临床医生施测了CASIG知情者量表(CASIG-I)。参与的消费者还完成了行为和症状识别量表-32(BASIS-32)、简短健康调查-36(SF-36)以及坎伯韦尔需求评估量表(CAN)。知情者也完成了CAN的临床医生版本。CASIG-SR和CASIG-I具有足够的内部一致性、重测信度和评分者间信度。消费者和知情者的结果与BASIS-32、SF-36和CAN的相关性提供了收敛效度和区分效度的证据,功能较高和较低的社区消费者之间的对比也是如此。因素分析也支持了该评估的结构效度。结果证实了改编和翻译后的CASIG在加拿大具有足够的心理测量学特性。

相似文献

1
Further validation of the Client Assessment of Strengths Interests and Goals.客户优势、兴趣和目标评估的进一步验证。
Schizophr Res. 2004 Jan 1;66(1):59-70. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(02)00496-6.
2
CASIG: a consumer-centered assessment for planning individualized treatment and evaluating program outcomes.CASIG:一种以消费者为中心的评估方法,用于规划个性化治疗和评估项目成果。
Schizophr Res. 2001 May 30;50(1-2):105-19. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(00)00068-2.
3
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Can J Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;69(10):759-767. doi: 10.1177/07067437241261481. Epub 2024 Jul 21.
4
Social functioning scale: new contributions concerning its psychometric characteristics in a Spanish adaptation.社会功能量表:西班牙文改编版中关于其心理测量特征的新贡献。
Psychiatry Res. 2000 Apr 10;93(3):247-56. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(99)00123-7.
5
Development and psychometric performance of the schizophrenia objective functioning instrument: an interviewer administered measure of function.精神分裂症客观功能量表的编制与心理测量学特性:一种由访谈者实施的功能测量工具
Schizophr Res. 2009 Feb;107(2-3):275-85. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
6
Chinese version of the Assessment of Interpersonal Problem Solving Skills.人际问题解决技能评估中文版。
Psychiatry Res. 2006 Aug 30;143(2-3):189-97. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.08.011. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
7
A Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the 'Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, HoNOS-D': on the feasibility and reliability of clinician-performed measurements of severity in patients with mental disorders.《国家健康结果量表德文版(HoNOS-D)的心理测量学评估:关于临床医生对精神障碍患者严重程度测量的可行性和可靠性》
Psychopathology. 2007;40(2):116-25. doi: 10.1159/000098492. Epub 2007 Jan 11.
8
Cross-cultural validation of a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure for systemic lupus erythematosus in Canada.在加拿大对一种用于系统性红斑狼疮的疾病特异性患者报告结局测量工具进行跨文化验证。
J Rheumatol. 2013 Aug;40(8):1327-33. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.121129. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
9
Testing the validity of the Recovery Assessment Scale using an Australian sample.使用澳大利亚样本检验康复评估量表的有效性。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2007 May;41(5):450-7. doi: 10.1080/00048670701264792.
10
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of yoruba version of the short-form 36 health survey.约鲁巴语版36项简短健康调查问卷的翻译、跨文化调适及心理测量学评估
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Sep 14;13:141. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0337-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of the psychopathological vulnerability index for screening at-risk youths: a Rasch model approach.用于筛查高危青少年的心理病理学易感性指数的开发:一种拉施模型方法。
Npj Ment Health Res. 2024 Dec 2;3(1):60. doi: 10.1038/s44184-024-00106-6.
2
Embracing a different outlook: Strengths and goals of individuals currently in treatment for anorexia nervosa.接纳不同的观点:目前正在接受神经性厌食症治疗的个体的优势与目标。
Eat Weight Disord. 2024 Oct 2;29(1):63. doi: 10.1007/s40519-024-01689-x.
3
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Can J Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;69(10):759-767. doi: 10.1177/07067437241261481. Epub 2024 Jul 21.
4
Effectiveness of the Boston University Approach to Psychiatric Rehabilitation in Improving Social Participation in People With Severe Mental Illnesses: A Randomized Controlled Trial.波士顿大学精神疾病康复方法对改善重度精神疾病患者社会参与度的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 23;11:571640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.571640. eCollection 2020.
5
CHoice of Outcome In Cbt for psychosEs (CHOICE): the development of a new service user-led outcome measure of CBT for psychosis.心理治疗(CBT)治疗精神病的结果选择(CHOICE):为精神病 CBT 制定新的以服务使用者为导向的结果衡量标准。
Schizophr Bull. 2010 Jan;36(1):126-35. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp117. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
6
Addressing mental health disparities through clinical competence not just cultural competence: the need for assessment of sociocultural issues in the delivery of evidence-based psychosocial rehabilitation services.通过临床能力而非仅仅文化能力来解决心理健康差异问题:在提供循证心理社会康复服务时评估社会文化问题的必要性。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Dec;28(8):1386-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.006. Epub 2008 Jul 29.