Kleinman Leah, Lieberman Jeffrey, Dube Sanjay, Mohs Richard, Zhao Yang, Kinon Bruce, Carpenter William, Harvey Philip D, Green Michael F, Keefe Richard S E, Frank Lori, Bowman Lee, Revicki Dennis A
United BioSource Corporation, Seattle, WA 98101, United States.
Schizophr Res. 2009 Feb;107(2-3):275-85. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
Existing measures for functional assessment do not adequately address the relationship between cognitive impairment and function. The Schizophrenia Outcomes Functioning Interview (SOFI) was developed to measure community functioning related to cognitive impairment and psychopathology. Following review of existing measures and discussion with experts, caregivers, and patients, content was generated for four domains: 1) living situation; 2) IADLs; 3) productive activities; and 4) social functioning. The final SOFI was constructed with items informing domain scores, and an interviewer-completed global rating for each domain. Psychometric characteristics of the SOFI were evaluated in a sample of 104 community residing patients with schizophrenia and their informants. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in a sub-sample of patient-informant dyads using ICC; all values were >0.70 for both patient-interviews (SOFI-P) and informant-interviews (SOFI-I). Inter-rater reliability ICCs ranged from 0.50 to 0.79 on a different sub-sample. The SOFI demonstrated adequate construct validity based on correlations with the PSP (range 0.58 to 0.76; p<0.0001) and the QLS (p<0.001). Some correlations between SOFI and PETiT scores were low to moderate (p<0.05). Discriminant validity was supported based on SOFI score comparisons for patient groups based on PANSS and BACS scores (p<0.05); SOFI scores differed between borderline and moderately ill patients as measured by the CGI-S (p<0.05). The SOFI expands on existing measures and more comprehensively captures functioning of patients in the real world than other performance-based (proxy) measures. The SOFI has good evidence supporting reliability and construct validity, and may be a useful measure of functional outcomes in schizophrenia.
现有的功能评估方法未能充分解决认知障碍与功能之间的关系。精神分裂症结局功能访谈(SOFI)旨在测量与认知障碍和精神病理学相关的社区功能。在对现有方法进行审查并与专家、护理人员和患者进行讨论后,确定了四个领域的内容:1)生活状况;2)工具性日常生活活动;3)生产性活动;4)社会功能。最终的SOFI由用于计算领域得分的项目以及访谈者对每个领域完成的整体评分构成。在104名社区精神分裂症患者及其信息提供者的样本中对SOFI的心理测量特征进行了评估。使用组内相关系数(ICC)在患者-信息提供者二元组的子样本中评估重测信度;患者访谈(SOFI-P)和信息提供者访谈(SOFI-I)的所有值均>0.70。在另一个子样本中,评分者间信度ICC范围为0.50至0.79。基于与功能大体评定量表(PSP,范围0.58至0.76;p<0.0001)和生活质量量表(QLS,p<0.001)的相关性,SOFI显示出足够的结构效度。SOFI与PETiT评分之间的一些相关性为低到中度(p<0.05)。基于根据阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)和简短认知评估量表(BACS)得分对患者组的SOFI评分比较,支持了区分效度(p<0.05);根据临床总体印象量表严重程度(CGI-S)测量,边缘性和中度疾病患者的SOFI评分不同(p<0.05)。SOFI在现有方法的基础上进行了扩展,比其他基于表现的(代理)方法更全面地反映了患者在现实世界中的功能。SOFI有充分的证据支持其信度和结构效度,可能是精神分裂症功能结局的一种有用测量方法。