Suppr超能文献

对侧重度颈动脉狭窄或闭塞与择期颈动脉支架置入术后神经功能不良预后风险增加无关。

Contralateral high-grade carotid artery stenosis or occlusion is not associated with increased risk for poor neurologic outcome after elective carotid stent placement.

作者信息

Sabeti Schila, Schillinger Martin, Mlekusch Wolfgang, Nachtmann Tassilo, Lang Wilfried, Ahmadi Ramazanali, Minar Erich

机构信息

Departments of Angiology and Clinical Neurology, University of Vienna Medical School, Austria.

出版信息

Radiology. 2004 Jan;230(1):70-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2301021371.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare neurologic outcome after elective internal carotid artery (ICA) stents have been placed in patients with and in patients without contralateral ICA obstructions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 471 consecutive patients from a registry database who underwent elective ICA stent placement without cerebral protection for high-grade (greater than 70% stenosis of the ICA, according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial) symptomatic (n = 147) or asymptomatic (n = 324) ICA stenosis. Contralateral carotid arteries were investigated with angiography. Patients with and patients without contralateral high-grade stenosis (70%-99% stenosis, according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial) or occlusion were compared with respect to 30-day neurologic outcome by using the chi2 test and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Neurologic events were observed in 33 patients (7%) with 15 transient ischemic attacks, eight minor strokes, and 10 major strokes that led to death in two patients (combined stroke and death rate, 4%). Eighty-eight patients (19%) with contralateral high-grade ICA stenosis and 43 patients (9%) with contralateral ICA occlusion exhibited a similar rate of postintervention combined neurologic events (n = 9, 7%) compared with patients without contralateral high-grade ICA stenosis or occlusion (n = 24, 7%) (P =.94). No differences were observed between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Combined stroke and death rates were also comparable between symptomatic (four of 131, 3%) and asymptomatic (14 of 340, 4%) patients (P =.59). Of all variables tested, multivariate analysis did not detect any predictor for peri- or postinterventional neurologic events.

CONCLUSION

Contralateral high-grade ICA stenosis or occlusion was not associated with an increased risk for neurologic events after elective ICA stent placement.

摘要

目的

比较择期行颈内动脉(ICA)支架置入术的患者中,有或无对侧ICA闭塞患者的神经学转归。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了来自登记数据库的471例连续患者,这些患者因高度(根据北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验,ICA狭窄大于70%)症状性(n = 147)或无症状性(n = 324)ICA狭窄接受了无脑保护的择期ICA支架置入术。对侧颈动脉进行了血管造影检查。根据北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验,将有和无对侧高度狭窄(70%-99%狭窄)或闭塞的患者在30天神经学转归方面进行比较,采用卡方检验和多因素逻辑回归分析。

结果

33例患者(7%)发生神经学事件,其中15例短暂性脑缺血发作,8例轻度卒中,10例重度卒中导致2例患者死亡(卒中合并死亡率为4%)。88例(19%)对侧ICA高度狭窄患者和43例(9%)对侧ICA闭塞患者的干预后合并神经学事件发生率(n = 9,7%)与无对侧ICA高度狭窄或闭塞的患者(n = 24,7%)相似(P = 0.94)。有症状和无症状患者之间未观察到差异。有症状患者(131例中的4例,3%)和无症状患者(34例中的14例,4%)的卒中合并死亡率也相当(P = 0.59)。在所有测试变量中,多因素分析未发现围手术期或干预后神经学事件的任何预测因素。

结论

择期ICA支架置入术后,对侧ICA高度狭窄或闭塞与神经学事件风险增加无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验