Bryan Darren S, Carson John, Hall Heather, He Qi, Qato Khalil, Lozanski Laurie, McCormick Susan, Skelly Christopher L
School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;27(2):186-93. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
Carotid artery occlusion (CAO) is a risk factor for stroke ipsilateral to the occlusion and puts patients in a high-risk category when contralateral endarterectomy is performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with internal CAO and to determine risk factors predictive of subsequent neurological event, contralateral carotid intervention, or death. Patients with internal CAO shown by duplex ultrasonography were retrospectively identified and followed between January 2002 and June 2010 (follow-up: 1-101 months, mean: 52 months) at a tertiary care hospital. All had multiple duplex examinations available for review. Chi-square analysis was used to determine risk factors for neurologic event, contralateral intervention, or all-cause morality. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis was conducted using univariate risk factors with P values <0.1. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method (P < 0.05 significant). Eighty patients with internal CAO were identified and available for analysis. On initial encounter, 30 (38%) were symptomatic, with 26 (87%) having symptoms referable to the side of the occluded internal carotid artery. During follow-up, seven (9%) had a neurologic event, of which six (86%) were referable to the occluded side; 14 (18%) patients underwent a contralateral operation. Nineteen (24%) patients died during the period of study. Although numerous variables of multivessel disease were significant with χ(2) analysis, there was no significant risk factor associated with neurologic event on multivariate analysis. However, the development of a hemodynamically significant stenosis (>50%) or occlusion of the external carotid artery (ECA) ipsilateral to the occlusion on follow-up (P < 0.027) was associated with increased risk of death. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed 7-year survival for patients with ECA disease at follow-up was significantly worse (16.2% ± 10.3% [n = 21] vs. 79% ± 8.7% [n = 59]; P < 0.00001). Frequently, patients present with neurological symptoms referable to the side of the internal CAO. Eighty-six percent of neurologic events that occur in follow-up are attributable to the side of the occluded carotid, indicating that the occluded side continues to contribute to neurologic morbidity over time. Multivariate analysis revealed no single factor to be predictive of subsequent neurologic events. With significant risk of death in patients found to have ipsilateral ECA stenosis during follow-up, it seems reasonable to continue surveillance of the occluded carotid.
颈动脉闭塞(CAO)是闭塞同侧发生中风的危险因素,当进行对侧颈动脉内膜切除术时,患者属于高危类别。本研究的目的是评估颈内动脉闭塞患者的长期预后,并确定预测后续神经事件、对侧颈动脉干预或死亡的危险因素。通过双功超声检查显示颈内动脉闭塞的患者在2002年1月至2010年6月期间在一家三级医疗中心进行回顾性识别和随访(随访时间:1 - 101个月,平均52个月)。所有患者都有多次双功超声检查结果可供复查。采用卡方分析来确定神经事件、对侧干预或全因死亡率的危险因素。使用P值<0.1的单因素危险因素进行多变量Cox比例风险分析。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估计生存率(P < 0.05为显著)。共识别出80例颈内动脉闭塞患者并可供分析。初次就诊时,30例(38%)有症状,其中26例(87%)的症状与闭塞的颈内动脉一侧有关。在随访期间,7例(9%)发生神经事件,其中6例(86%)与闭塞侧有关;14例(18%)患者接受了对侧手术。19例(24%)患者在研究期间死亡。尽管多血管疾病的许多变量在卡方分析中具有显著性,但多变量分析中没有与神经事件相关的显著危险因素。然而,随访时发现闭塞同侧颈外动脉(ECA)出现血流动力学显著狭窄(>50%)或闭塞(P < 0.027)与死亡风险增加相关。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,随访时患有ECA疾病的患者7年生存率显著更差(16.2% ± 10.3% [n = 21] 对比 79% ± 8.7% [n = 59];P < 0.00001)。通常,患者会出现与颈内动脉闭塞一侧相关的神经症状。随访中发生的神经事件有86%归因于闭塞的颈动脉一侧,这表明随着时间推移,闭塞侧继续导致神经功能障碍。多变量分析未发现单一因素可预测后续神经事件。鉴于随访中发现同侧ECA狭窄的患者有显著死亡风险,继续监测闭塞的颈动脉似乎是合理的。