• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Prognosis of osteosarcoma treated by limb-salvage surgery: the ten-year intergroup study in Japan.

作者信息

Tsuchiya H, Tomita K

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kanazawa University.

出版信息

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1992 Oct;22(5):347-53.

PMID:1469796
Abstract

We report the prognoses for 107 patients treated by limb-salvage surgery and 147 treated by amputation or disarticulation, during the period 1980-1985, at 22 university hospitals, cancer centers and national hospitals in Japan. In this multi-institute non-randomized study, the five-year cumulative survival rate was 70% for the former group and 49% for the latter. The prognosis was more favorable among patients who responded to preoperative chemotherapy than among those who did not. Limb-salvage surgery was feasible for most of the surgical stage IIB patients with small extraosseous tumor extensions who had responded to preoperative chemotherapy. Local tumor recurrences were seen in 15 (14%) of the 107 patients in the limb-salvage surgery group, nine of whom died of the metastasis. While limb-salvage surgery is being increasingly used in Japan, present indications show the procedure not to reduce survival rate for osteosarcoma patients. The survival rate of patients with wide-with-marginal margins was similar to that of patients with wide margins. Taking into account the long-term survival of osteosarcoma patients, limb-salvage surgery can be recommended when the osteosarcoma responds to preoperative chemotherapy.

摘要

相似文献

1
Prognosis of osteosarcoma treated by limb-salvage surgery: the ten-year intergroup study in Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1992 Oct;22(5):347-53.
2
Surgical outcomes in osteosarcoma.骨肉瘤的手术治疗结果
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Apr;84(3):395-400. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b3.12019.
3
Does amputation offer any survival benefit over limb salvage in osteosarcoma patients with poor chemonecrosis and close margins?对于化疗坏死效果不佳且切缘阳性的骨肉瘤患者,截肢相对于保肢是否具有任何生存益处?
Bone Joint J. 2015 Jan;97-B(1):115-20. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B1.33924.
4
Combined pre-operative chemotherapy with intra-arterial cisplatin and continuous intravenous adriamycin for high grade osteosarcoma.术前联合顺铂动脉内注射和阿霉素持续静脉滴注治疗高级别骨肉瘤。
Oncol Rep. 1999 May-Jun;6(3):631-7. doi: 10.3892/or.6.3.631.
5
Does increased rate of limb-sparing surgery affect survival in osteosarcoma?保肢手术率的增加是否会影响骨肉瘤患者的生存率?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Nov;468(11):2854-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1423-4.
6
Relationship of chemotherapy-induced necrosis and surgical margins to local recurrence in osteosarcoma.骨肉瘤中化疗诱导的坏死及手术切缘与局部复发的关系
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Dec;12(12):2699-705. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.12.2699.
7
[Effect of a local surgical procedure on the incidence of metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma].
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1986 Jan-Feb;124(1):22-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1044518.
8
Similar survival but better function for patients after limb salvage versus amputation for distal tibia osteosarcoma.保肢治疗与截肢治疗对胫骨远端骨肉瘤患者的生存情况相似,但保肢治疗可改善患者的功能。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jun;470(6):1735-48. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2238-7. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
9
Current management, local management, and survival statistics of high-grade osteosarcoma. Experience in Japan.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Sep(270):72-8.
10
Pathologic fracture does not influence prognosis in stage IIB osteosarcoma: a case-control study.病理性骨折并不影响 IIB 期骨肉瘤的预后:一项病例对照研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jun 24;11:148. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-148.

引用本文的文献

1
Bifunctional bone substitute materials for bone defect treatment after bone tumor resection.用于骨肿瘤切除术后骨缺损治疗的双功能骨替代材料。
Mater Today Bio. 2023 Dec 1;23:100889. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100889. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Prognosis of limb‑salvage treatment of osteosarcoma in adolescent patients: a meta‑analysis.青少年骨肉瘤保肢治疗的预后:一项荟萃分析。
Oncol Lett. 2023 Sep 15;26(5):466. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.14053. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Dual-functional porous and cisplatin-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cement for reconstruction of load-bearing bone defect kills bone tumor cells.
用于重建承重骨缺损的双功能多孔载顺铂聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥可杀死骨肿瘤细胞。
Bioact Mater. 2021 Dec 29;15:120-130. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.12.023. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
A meta-analysis comparing efficiency of limb-salvage surgery vs amputation on patients with osteosarcoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.一项荟萃分析比较了新辅助化疗治疗骨肉瘤患者保肢手术与截肢的疗效。
Int Wound J. 2022 Nov;19(7):1616-1624. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13758. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
5
Limb-salvage surgery offers better five-year survival rate than amputation in patients with limb osteosarcoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis.对于接受新辅助化疗的肢体骨肉瘤患者,保肢手术的五年生存率高于截肢手术。一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Bone Oncol. 2020 Sep 15;25:100319. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100319. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
Treatment-Related Prognostic Factors in Managing Osteosarcoma around the Knee with Limb Salvage Surgery: A Lesson from a Long-Term Follow-Up Study.保肢手术治疗膝关节周围骨肉瘤的相关预后因素:一项长期随访研究的启示。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 May 2;2019:3215824. doi: 10.1155/2019/3215824. eCollection 2019.
7
The Significance of a "Close" Margin in Extremity Sarcoma: A Systematic Review.肢体肉瘤“切缘阳性”的意义:一项系统评价
Iowa Orthop J. 2018;38:123-130.
8
Limb Salvage Versus Amputation in Conventional Appendicular Osteosarcoma: a Systematic Review.传统型肢体骨肉瘤保肢与截肢治疗的系统评价
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;9(2):232-240. doi: 10.1007/s13193-018-0725-y. Epub 2018 Jan 20.
9
Amputation Versus Limb-Salvage Surgery in Patients with Osteosarcoma: A Meta-analysis.骨肉瘤患者截肢术与保肢手术的Meta分析
World J Surg. 2016 Aug;40(8):2016-27. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3500-7.
10
A comparative study between limb-salvage and amputation for treating osteosarcoma.保肢治疗与截肢治疗骨肉瘤的对比研究。
J Bone Oncol. 2016 Jan 23;5(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2016.01.001. eCollection 2016 Mar.