Suppr超能文献

在创建最小项目集时分离率与系数α的比较。

A comparison of the separation ratio and coefficient alpha in the creation of minimum item sets.

作者信息

Mallinson Trudy, Stelmack Joan, Velozo Craig

机构信息

Clinical Research Scientist, Center for Rehabilitation Outcomes Research, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2004 Jan;42(1 Suppl):I17-24. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000103522.78233.c3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Short-form outcomes measures are becoming common in response to demands for increased efficiency in health care. This study examines Rasch measurement as an aid to selecting items for short form tests. The focus of this paper is on maintaining test quality while reducing items. The separation ratio (SR) aids item reduction by indicating how removing items impacts measurement precision. Results of the SR and coefficient alpha are compared.

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate the use of Rasch measurement to shorten clinical outcomes measures and to compare the separation ratio and coefficient alpha in evaluating when item reduction improved efficiency without sacrificing measurement precision.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of existing health outcomes data.

SUBJECTS

A convenience sample of 58 patients receiving cataract surgery.

MEASURES

The 14 items of the VF-14 (a measure of visual functioning), the published subset of items from this test (the VF-7), and 5 other 7-item combinations of the items.

RESULTS

The largest coefficient alpha was obtained from the VF14 (.84) while the largest separation ratio (2.67) was obtained from the 7-item subtest with the reduced rating scale.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated one way that Rasch measurement can be helpful in selecting items for minimum item sets while maintaining test precision. Both alpha and the separation ratio provide information about how a sample performed with a given test although variations in measurement precision may not always be detected with alpha.

摘要

背景

为响应提高医疗保健效率的需求,简式结局测量方法正变得越来越普遍。本研究探讨了拉施测量法在为简式测试选择项目方面的辅助作用。本文的重点是在减少项目数量的同时保持测试质量。分离比(SR)通过表明去除项目如何影响测量精度来辅助项目缩减。对分离比和α系数的结果进行了比较。

目的

证明使用拉施测量法来缩短临床结局测量方法,并比较分离比和α系数在评估项目缩减在不牺牲测量精度的情况下提高效率时的情况。

研究设计

对现有健康结局数据进行回顾性分析。

研究对象

58例接受白内障手术患者的便利样本。

测量指标

VF - 14的14个项目(一种视觉功能测量方法)、该测试已发表的项目子集(VF - 7)以及其他5种7个项目的组合。

结果

VF14获得了最大的α系数(0.84),而缩减评分量表的7个项目子测试获得了最大的分离比(2.67)。

结论

本研究证明了拉施测量法在为最小项目集选择项目同时保持测试精度方面可能有用的一种方式。α系数和分离比都提供了关于样本在给定测试中的表现的信息,尽管测量精度的变化可能并不总是能用α系数检测到。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验