NH&MRC (National Health and Medical Research Council) Centre for Clinical Eye Research, Department of Optometry and Vision Science, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders University of South Australia, South Australia, Australia.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Feb;51(2):694-700. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3448. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
Previous Rasch analysis of the Activities of Daily Vision Scale (ADVS) did not address psychometric properties of its subscales or provide detailed assessment of dimensionality (whether the ADVS measures one or multiple constructs). This study was designed to examine these properties.
Two hundred thirty-two participants (mean age, 74.2 years) awaiting cataract surgery self-administered the ADVS. Rasch analysis was used to assess the ADVS and its five subscales for unidimensionality (by principal components analysis, [PCA]), precision by person separation (discrimination between strata of participant ability), and targeting (matching of item difficulty to participant ability). Adequate person separation (minimum acceptable value, 2.0) is the fundamental requirement for measurement.
Only the near vision subscale had adequate measurement properties (person separation, 2.30). The entire ADVS showed a misfit to the Rasch model and lacked unidimensionality. PCA confirmed the presence of two additional traits-driving and glare disability-but neither possessed adequate person separation when assessed individually. Deleting these traits restored unidimensionality, but additional items misfit, necessitating item reduction. Finally, an eight-item ADVS-Near Vision Scale showed good fit and unidimensionality. Its contents were identical with the original near vision subscale. Targeting was suboptimal (2.30 logits).
Only one subscale, near vision, met the criteria for measurement. The revised eight-item ADVS-Near Vision subscale is a unidimensional measure of visual disability in cataract patients with mild visual disability. However, it is limited by measurement of near visual ability only. For more comprehensive measurement of visual disability, other questionnaires such as Catquest-9SF are preferable for cataract surgery outcomes assessment.
先前对日常视觉活动量表(ADVS)的 Rasch 分析并未解决其分量表的心理测量特性,也未详细评估维度(ADVS 是否测量一个或多个结构)。本研究旨在检验这些特性。
232 名(平均年龄 74.2 岁)等待白内障手术的参与者自行完成 ADVS。使用 Rasch 分析评估 ADVS 及其五个分量表的单维性(通过主成分分析,[PCA])、个体分离的精度(区分参与者能力的层次)和目标定位(项目难度与个体能力匹配)。足够的个体分离(最小可接受值为 2.0)是测量的基本要求。
只有近视力分量表具有足够的测量特性(个体分离,2.30)。整个 ADVS 与 Rasch 模型不匹配,缺乏单维性。PCA 证实存在另外两个特征——驾驶和眩光障碍,但单独评估时,两者的个体分离均不足。删除这些特征恢复了单维性,但其他项目不符合要求,需要减少项目。最后,一个包含八项的 ADVS-近视力量表显示出良好的拟合度和单维性。其内容与原始近视力分量表相同。目标定位不佳(2.30 对数单位)。
只有一个分量表,即近视力,符合测量标准。经过修订的八项 ADVS-近视力分量表是一个用于评估轻度视力障碍的白内障患者视觉障碍的单维测量工具。然而,它仅限于近视力能力的测量。对于更全面的视觉障碍测量,其他问卷如 Catquest-9SF 更适合白内障手术结果评估。