Sagaspe Patricia, Charles André, Taillard Jacques, Bioulac Bernard, Philip Pierre
Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Département de Psychologie, Bordeaux cedex.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2003 Dec;57(4):265-73.
The literature contains inconsistent data on the effects of acute sleep deprivation on the superior cognitive functions. The primary purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of inhibition, one of the functions of the working memory executive centre (EC), over an extended, 36-hour waking period. Inhibition is a cognitive mechanism whereby individuals ignore non-relevant information recorded in their working memory. We also tested the effects of a 36-hour period of acute sleep deprivation on simple reaction time. Twelve young, healthy volunteers (M = 21.5 years, sigma = 2.3) performed a random generation task involving letters and a simple reaction time psychomotor test over four sessions held at 10-hour intervals. Each participant was assigned a "constant routine." Participants were kept awake in a prone position within a room whose environment was held strictly constant (light, noise, temperature, meals, etc.). This control procedure provided assurance that any variation in participant performance was solely caused by sleep deprivation. The random generation task, nearly two minutes in length, consisted in verbally producing a sequence of 100 letters in a random fashion (i.e. by inhibiting, for example, alphabetical order) and by keeping to a set rhythm. Our assumption was that capacity for inhibition diminished as the number of hours of sleep deprivation increased. The simple reaction test, 10 minutes in length, involved pressing a button as swiftly as possible to cause a black square to disappear from a screen. In this case our assumption was that acute sleep deprivation alters simple reaction time. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) through repeated measures using the "sessions" factor as an intra-subject variable showed no significant changes in randomization indices of the random generation task, contrary to analysis of average simple reaction times. Participants' reaction times deteriorated over the first two minutes of the test during the night they were deprived of sleep. It would seem that the contradictory results of previous studies of the effects of acute sleep deprivation on the inhibition function would be due to errors in factor identification. In conclusion, the inhibition function, as measured during the performance of a brief task, seems to remain intact during an extended, 36-hour waking period. Simple reaction time assessed by means of a brief psychomotor test is affected during a night of sleep deprivation. The working-memory inhibition executive function shows greater resistance to acute sleep deprivation than does psychomotor reaction time for the performance of short tasks.
关于急性睡眠剥夺对高级认知功能的影响,文献中的数据并不一致。本研究的主要目的是确定在长达36小时的清醒期内,工作记忆执行中心(EC)的功能之一——抑制功能的有效性。抑制是一种认知机制,通过它个体可以忽略工作记忆中记录的无关信息。我们还测试了36小时急性睡眠剥夺对简单反应时间的影响。12名年轻健康的志愿者(平均年龄M = 21.5岁,标准差sigma = 2.3)在四个间隔10小时的时间段内,进行了一项涉及字母的随机生成任务和一项简单反应时间心理运动测试。为每个参与者安排了“固定作息”。参与者在一个房间内俯卧保持清醒,房间环境严格保持恒定(光线、噪音、温度、饮食等)。这种控制程序确保了参与者表现的任何变化都完全是由睡眠剥夺引起的。随机生成任务时长近两分钟,要求以随机方式(例如抑制字母顺序)口头生成100个字母的序列,并保持一定节奏。我们的假设是,随着睡眠剥夺小时数的增加,抑制能力会下降。简单反应测试时长10分钟,要求尽可能迅速地按下按钮,使屏幕上的黑色方块消失。在这种情况下,我们的假设是急性睡眠剥夺会改变简单反应时间。使用“时间段”因素作为受试者内变量进行重复测量的方差分析(ANOVA)显示,随机生成任务的随机化指标没有显著变化,这与平均简单反应时间的分析结果相反。在被剥夺睡眠的夜晚,参与者在测试的前两分钟内反应时间变差。先前关于急性睡眠剥夺对抑制功能影响的研究结果相互矛盾,似乎是由于因素识别错误所致。总之,在执行简短任务期间测量的抑制功能,在长达36小时的清醒期内似乎保持完好。通过简短心理运动测试评估的简单反应时间在睡眠剥夺的夜晚会受到影响。对于执行简短任务,工作记忆抑制执行功能比心理运动反应时间对急性睡眠剥夺具有更强的抵抗力。