• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西蒙效应是否存在左右优势?

Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect?

作者信息

Proctor Robert W, Vu Kim-Phuong L, Nicoletti Ryan

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2004, USA.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 2003 Nov;65(8):1318-29. doi: 10.3758/bf03194855.

DOI:10.3758/bf03194855
PMID:14710965
Abstract

In four experiments, we investigated whether a right-left prevalence effect occurs for the Simon task, in which stimulus location is irrelevant, when the stimulus and the response sets vary along horizontal and vertical dimensions simultaneously. Simon effects were evident for both dimensions, and they were of similar magnitude, indicating no prevalence effect. Manipulations of the relative salience of the dimensions for the stimulus and the response sets resulted in a larger Simon effect for the more salient dimension than for the less salient one, but there was no overall prevalence effect. The results indicate that manipulations of salience affect the relative magnitudes of automatic response activation for the vertical and the horizontal dimensions but that the right-left prevalence effect is due to a coding bias in intentional response selection processes when stimulus location is relevant.

摘要

在四项实验中,我们研究了在刺激位置无关的西蒙任务中,当刺激和反应集同时沿水平和垂直维度变化时,是否会出现左右优势效应。两个维度的西蒙效应均很明显,且大小相似,表明不存在优势效应。对刺激和反应集维度的相对显著性进行操纵后,较显著维度的西蒙效应大于较不显著维度,但总体上不存在优势效应。结果表明,显著性操纵会影响垂直和水平维度自动反应激活的相对大小,但左右优势效应是由于在刺激位置相关时,有意反应选择过程中的编码偏差所致。

相似文献

1
Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect?西蒙效应是否存在左右优势?
Percept Psychophys. 2003 Nov;65(8):1318-29. doi: 10.3758/bf03194855.
2
Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks.处理无关位置信息:选择反应任务中的练习与迁移效应
Mem Cognit. 1999 Jan;27(1):63-77. doi: 10.3758/bf03201214.
3
No overall right-left prevalence for horizontal and vertical Simon effects.水平和垂直西蒙效应不存在整体的左右偏向性。
Percept Psychophys. 2005 Jul;67(5):929-38. doi: 10.3758/bf03193544.
4
Transfer effects of incompatible location-relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory simon task.不兼容的位置相关映射对后续视觉或听觉西蒙任务的迁移效应。
Mem Cognit. 2003 Oct;31(7):1146-52. doi: 10.3758/bf03196135.
5
Decay of stimulus spatial code in horizontal and vertical Simon tasks.刺激空间编码在水平和垂直 Simon 任务中的衰减。
J Gen Psychol. 2009 Oct;136(4):350-73. doi: 10.1080/00221300903266580.
6
Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.将无关位置维度作为相关刺激维度的函数进行处理。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Apr;20(2):286-98.
7
Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.斯特鲁普范式和西蒙范式中的干扰效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Aug;19(4):830-44. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.4.830.
8
Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.混合任务和映射下 S-R 兼容性和西蒙效应的分离。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Apr;39(2):593-609. doi: 10.1037/a0029923. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
9
Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: reactions toward the source of stimulation.反应选择过程中的冲突会影响反应编程:对刺激源的反应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Jun;35(3):816-34. doi: 10.1037/a0011092.
10
Stimulus congruence and the Simon effect.
Psychol Res. 1994;56(3):196-202. doi: 10.1007/BF00419707.

引用本文的文献

1
The Simon Effect Asymmetry for Left- and Right-Dominant Persons.左利手和右利手人群的西蒙效应不对称性。
J Cogn. 2023 Mar 3;6(1):17. doi: 10.5334/joc.265. eCollection 2023.
2
Independent effects of 2-D and 3-D locations of stimuli in a 3-D display on response speed in a Simon task.三维显示中刺激的二维和三维位置对西蒙任务反应速度的独立影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 1;6:1302. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01302. eCollection 2015.
3
Somatotopic representation of location: evidence from the Simon effect.位置的躯体感觉定位表征:来自西蒙效应的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Dec;40(6):2131-42. doi: 10.1037/a0037975. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
4
Analyzing distributional properties of interference effects across modalities: chances and challenges.分析跨模态干扰效应的分布特性:机遇与挑战。
Psychol Res. 2014;78(3):387-99. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0551-y. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
5
Space positional and motion SRC effects: A comparison with the use of reaction time distribution analysis.空间位置和运动的源相关成分效应:与反应时间分布分析的使用比较。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2013 Dec 31;9(4):202-15. doi: 10.2478/v10053-008-0146-5. eCollection 2013.
6
How Task Goals Mediate the Interplay between Perception and Action.任务目标如何调解感知与行动的相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2013 May 7;4:247. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00247. eCollection 2013.
7
Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects.空间对应效应的反应时分布分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):242-66. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0053-5.
8
Influence of display type and cue format on task-cuing effects: dissociating switch cost and right-left prevalence effects.显示类型和提示格式对任务提示效应的影响:区分切换成本和左右流行效应。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Jul;36(5):998-1012. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.5.998.
9
Influences on the Simon effect of prior practice with spatially incompatible mappings: transfer within and between horizontal and vertical dimensions.先前对空间不兼容映射的练习对西蒙效应的影响:水平维度和垂直维度内及之间的迁移
Mem Cognit. 2007 Sep;35(6):1463-71. doi: 10.3758/bf03193616.
10
Effects of precuing horizontal and vertical dimensions on right-left prevalence.预提示水平和垂直维度对左右偏向的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jun;34(4):949-58. doi: 10.3758/bf03193440.