• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲共同体小儿脊柱侧位的质量标准评估。

Evaluation of the Commission of the European Communities quality criteria for the paediatric lateral spine.

作者信息

Offiah A C, Hall C M

机构信息

Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2003 Dec;76(912):885-90. doi: 10.1259/bjr/57437508.

DOI:10.1259/bjr/57437508
PMID:14711776
Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the Commission of the European Communities (CEC) quality criteria for paediatric lateral spine radiographs, and to use these to assess and compare the quality of film-screen and digital images. 286 paediatric lateral spine radiographs (89 film-screen and 197 digital) were independently analysed by two observers according to the CEC criteria. Based on fulfilment of criteria, images were assigned two scores, an image criteria score and a visual grading analysis score. Sensitivity values (S) on digital radiographs were recorded and correlated with image quality. Variability for assignment of scores between observers was lower for the image criteria than the visual grading analysis technique. Analysis of variance for fulfilment of criteria between techniques, and (for digital images) age and sensitivity values was calculated. Film-screen did significantly better (p<0.05) than digital imaging for Criterion 6 (visually sharp reproduction of the cortex and trabecular markings consistent with age), but significantly worse for Criterion 7 (reproduction of the adjacent soft tissues). There was a significant difference in mean S values for each age group when Criterion 6 was or was not met. Results show that although interpretation between two observers was ambiguous, the CEC criteria were able to detect differences in quality of film-screen and digital images. It is also possible to use them when optimizing target S values.

摘要

该研究旨在评估欧洲共同体委员会(CEC)制定的小儿脊柱侧位X线片质量标准,并运用这些标准评估和比较胶片-屏片成像与数字成像的质量。两名观察者根据CEC标准对286张小儿脊柱侧位X线片(89张胶片-屏片成像和197张数字成像)进行了独立分析。根据标准的满足情况,图像被赋予两个分数,即图像标准分数和视觉分级分析分数。记录数字X线片的敏感度值(S),并将其与图像质量相关联。观察者之间在图像标准分数的赋值上的变异性低于视觉分级分析技术。计算了不同技术之间、(针对数字图像)年龄和敏感度值之间在标准满足情况方面的方差分析。对于标准6(与年龄相符的皮质和小梁标记的视觉清晰再现),胶片-屏片成像明显优于数字成像(p<0.05),但对于标准7(相邻软组织的再现)则明显较差。当标准6满足或不满足时,各年龄组的平均S值存在显著差异。结果表明,尽管两名观察者之间的解读存在模糊性,但CEC标准能够检测出胶片-屏片成像和数字成像在质量上的差异。在优化目标S值时也可以使用这些标准。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Commission of the European Communities quality criteria for the paediatric lateral spine.欧洲共同体小儿脊柱侧位的质量标准评估。
Br J Radiol. 2003 Dec;76(912):885-90. doi: 10.1259/bjr/57437508.
2
European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images of the lumbar spine - an intra- and inter-observer reproducibility study.欧洲腰椎诊断放射影像质量标准指南——一项观察者内和观察者间的再现性研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 May 1;27:20. doi: 10.1186/s12998-019-0241-3. eCollection 2019.
3
The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria.通过既定的CEC图像标准评估不同技术因素对腰椎X线片图像质量的影响。
Br J Radiol. 2000 Nov;73(875):1192-9. doi: 10.1259/bjr.73.875.11144797.
4
Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.基于胶片和数字全景X线摄影的质量。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Jan;33(1):32-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/17777906.
5
Influence of the characteristic curve on the clinical image quality of lumbar spine and chest radiographs.
Br J Radiol. 2004 Mar;77(915):204-15. doi: 10.1259/bjr/22642890.
6
European guidelines on radiographic image quality in chiropractic practice - proposal of a cross-sectional graded classification reporting principle.欧洲脊骨疗法实践中的放射影像质量指南 - 提出一种横断面分级分类报告原则。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2021 May 26;29(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12998-021-00375-4.
7
[Selenium-based digital radiography of the cervical spine: comparison with screen-film radiography for the depiction of anatomic details].[基于硒的颈椎数字X线摄影:与屏-片摄影在显示解剖细节方面的比较]
Rofo. 2002 Aug;174(8):1028-32. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32927.
8
Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者评估中使用的传统和三种数字放射成像方法的观察者差异比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Mar 15;33(6):681-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318166aa8d.
9
Skeletal surveys for child abuse: comparison of interpretation using digitized images and screen-film radiographs.针对虐待儿童的骨骼检查:数字化图像与屏-片X线摄影解读的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Nov;171(5):1415-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.5.9798889.
10
Inter-observer variation in masked and unmasked images for quality evaluation of clinical radiographs.用于临床X光片质量评估的掩蔽和非掩蔽图像的观察者间差异。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):62-8. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch527.