Suppr超能文献

通过既定的CEC图像标准评估不同技术因素对腰椎X线片图像质量的影响。

The influence of different technique factors on image quality of lumbar spine radiographs as evaluated by established CEC image criteria.

作者信息

Almén A, Tingberg A, Mattsson S, Besjakov J, Kheddache S, Lanhede B, Månsson L G, Zankl M

机构信息

Department of Radiation Physics, Malmö University Hospital, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2000 Nov;73(875):1192-9. doi: 10.1259/bjr.73.875.11144797.

Abstract

In this study we have investigated the image quality of lumbar spine radiographs taken after recording technical and physical parameters. Two technical parameters were altered, tube voltage (70 kV and 90 kV for the anteroposterior (AP) projection and 77 kV and 95 kV for the lateral projection) and sensitivity of the film-screen system (sensitivity class 400 and 600). In total, 85 images were included in the study. Entrance surface dose (ESD) was measured using thermoluminescent dosemeters. The mean value of ESD for the different technique groups varied between 1.9 mGy (90 kV, sensitivity class 400) and 4.6 mGy (70 kV, sensitivity class 400) for the AP projection, and between 6.4 mGy (95 kV, sensitivity class 600) and 20.4 mGy (70 kV, sensitivity class 400) for the lateral projection. Image criteria given in the "European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Radiographic Images" were used to assess image quality. Two evaluation methods have been employed. A straightforward scoring of fulfilled image criteria, and visual grading analysis using the structures defined in the image criteria. The latter method provided a sharper distinction between groups of images taken using different radiographic techniques. The average number of fulfilled image criteria for the AP projections varied between 0.74 (90 kV, sensitivity class 400) and 0.87 (70 kV, sensitivity class 400). For the lateral projection this number varied between 0.79 (95 kV, sensitivity class 600) and 0.84 (77 kV, sensitivity class 600). This study shows that image criteria are useful tools in clinical studies of image quality.

摘要

在本研究中,我们在记录技术和物理参数后,对腰椎X光片的图像质量进行了调查。改变了两个技术参数,管电压(前后位(AP)投照为70 kV和90 kV,侧位投照为77 kV和95 kV)以及胶片-增感屏系统的感光度(感光度等级400和600)。该研究共纳入85张图像。使用热释光剂量计测量了体表入射剂量(ESD)。不同技术组的ESD平均值,前后位投照在1.9 mGy(90 kV,感光度等级400)至4.6 mGy(70 kV,感光度等级400)之间,侧位投照在6.4 mGy(95 kV,感光度等级600)至20.4 mGy(70 kV,感光度等级400)之间。采用《欧洲X光图像质量标准指南》中给出的图像标准来评估图像质量。采用了两种评估方法。一种是对符合图像标准进行直接评分,另一种是使用图像标准中定义的结构进行视觉分级分析。后一种方法能更清晰地区分使用不同X光摄影技术拍摄的图像组。前后位投照符合图像标准的平均数量在0.74(90 kV,感光度等级400)至0.87(70 kV,感光度等级400)之间。侧位投照的这一数量在0.79(95 kV,感光度等级600)至0.84(77 kV,感光度等级600)之间。本研究表明,图像标准是图像质量临床研究中的有用工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验