• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人技术与人体工程学。

Robotics and ergonomics.

作者信息

Stylopoulos Nicholas, Rattner David

机构信息

Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;83(6):1321-37. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00161-0.

DOI:10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00161-0
PMID:14712869
Abstract

Industrial robotics have proven the benefit of using an untiring machine to perform precise repetitive tasks in uncomfortable or dangerous for humans environments. Highly skilled surgeons are trained to operate and adapt to difficult conditions. They are even capable of developing intelligent mechanisms to exploit a variety of tactile, visual, and other cues. The robotic systems, however, can enhance the surgeon's capability to perform a wide variety of tasks. They cannot replace the surgeon's problem-solving ability. Instead, they will redefine his role. They will significantly enhance the surgeon's skills and dexterity by providing their complementary capabilities and an ergonomically efficient and more user-friendly working environment.

摘要

工业机器人已证明,在对人类而言不舒服或危险的环境中,使用不知疲倦的机器来执行精确的重复性任务是有益的。训练有素的高技能外科医生能够在困难条件下进行手术并适应这些条件。他们甚至有能力开发智能机制,以利用各种触觉、视觉和其他线索。然而,机器人系统可以提高外科医生执行各种任务的能力。它们无法取代外科医生解决问题的能力。相反,它们将重新定义外科医生的角色。它们将通过提供互补能力以及符合人体工程学的高效且更用户友好的工作环境,显著提高外科医生的技能和灵活性。

相似文献

1
Robotics and ergonomics.机器人技术与人体工程学。
Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;83(6):1321-37. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00161-0.
2
Haptic handles for robotic surgery.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;173:64-8.
3
The Minimally Invasive Manipulator: an ergonomic and economic non-robotic alternative for endoscopy?微创操纵器:一种用于内窥镜检查的符合人体工程学且经济的非机器人替代方案?
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015 Feb;24(1):24-30. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2014.992906.
4
The Laprotek surgical system and the next generation of robotics.拉普罗泰克手术系统与下一代机器人技术。
Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;83(6):1317-20. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00171-3.
5
Haptic interaction in robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a sensorized end-effector.机器人辅助内镜手术中的触觉交互:一种带有传感器的末端执行器。
Int J Med Robot. 2005 Jan;1(2):53-63. doi: 10.1002/rcs.16.
6
[Robotic surgery: current controversies and future expectations].[机器人手术:当前的争议与未来期望]
Cir Esp. 2013 Feb;91(2):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.07.005. Epub 2012 Dec 22.
7
Robotics and general surgery.机器人技术与普通外科手术。
Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;83(6):1405-19. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00159-2.
8
Effects of tactile cueing on concurrent performance of military and robotics tasks in a simulated multitasking environment.触觉提示对模拟多任务环境中军事和机器人任务并发执行的影响。
Ergonomics. 2008 Aug;51(8):1137-52. doi: 10.1080/00140130802030706.
9
Robotic cardiac surgery: overview.机器人心脏手术:概述
Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;83(6):1351-67, ix. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00166-X.
10
Development and testing of a tactile feedback system for robotic surgery.用于机器人手术的触觉反馈系统的开发与测试。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;142:103-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimising ergonomics in minimally invasive gynaecological surgery: a comprehensive review and practice recommendations.优化微创妇科手术中的人体工程学:全面综述与实践建议。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2025 Jun 27;17(2):180-191. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.2025.12. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
2
Patient Complexity and Bile Duct Injury After Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的患者复杂性和胆管损伤
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e251705. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1705.
3
Feasibility of hybrid robotic rectal surgery.
混合机器人直肠手术的可行性
Surg Today. 2025 Feb 8. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03001-5.
4
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Adrenal Tumors: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis on Perioperative Outcomes.机器人手术与腹腔镜肾上腺切除术治疗肾上腺肿瘤:围手术期结局的最新荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 5;17(1):150. doi: 10.3390/cancers17010150.
5
Retrospective cost analysis of robotic and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery and paraesophageal hernia repair.机器人辅助与腹腔镜抗反流手术及食管旁疝修补术的回顾性成本分析
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7179-7186. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11294-9. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
6
Ergonomics in the operation-theatre: a healthcare provider-based cross-sectional study.手术室中的人体工程学:一项基于医疗服务提供者的横断面研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Dec 2;86(1):127-132. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001538. eCollection 2024 Jan.
7
Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomies.机器人辅助与腹腔镜侧腹膜后肾上腺切除术的比较
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Aug;105(2):69-75. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.105.2.69. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
8
Visualisation ergonomics and robotic surgery.可视化人机工程学与机器人手术。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):1873-1878. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01618-7. Epub 2023 May 19.
9
Alimentary tract obstruction attributed to use of barbed suture for double tract reconstruction after robot-assisted proximal gastrectomy: a case report.因机器人辅助近端胃切除术后双道重建使用带刺缝线导致的消化道梗阻:病例报告。
BMC Surg. 2021 Nov 29;21(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01407-9.
10
Robotic colorectal surgery and ergonomics.机器人结直肠手术与工效学。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Apr;16(2):241-246. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01240-5. Epub 2021 Apr 22.