Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助与腹腔镜抗反流手术及食管旁疝修补术的回顾性成本分析

Retrospective cost analysis of robotic and laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery and paraesophageal hernia repair.

作者信息

Bauerle Wayne, Franey Daniel, Allsbrook Anthony, Evans Joseph, Reese Vanessa, Stoltzfus Jill, Harrison Meredith, Burfeind William, Brown Andrew M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA.

Department of Research and Innovation, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7179-7186. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11294-9. Epub 2024 Oct 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Increased adoption of robotics in foregut surgery evokes questions regarding efficacy, safety, and cost. To many, cost remains a barrier to adoption of a robotic approach. The authors' aim to determine the difference in cost of a robotic (R-) vs laparoscopic (L-) approach for paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR).

METHODS

Patients 18 years and older who underwent PEHR between July 2016 and June 2021 at a university health network were included. Variables of interest included 30 day outcomes, 1 year recurrence rates, and several cost variables including hospital length of stay, operating room (OR) time, chargeable supplies and implants, non-chargeable supplies, and indirect cost. Cost data were stratified by type and the presence of fundoplication, as well as the elective versus urgent nature of the procedures. Statistical analysis consisted of parametric and non-parametric analyses, with p < 0.05 denoting statistical significance.

RESULTS

405 patients were included in the study (n = 188 for R-, n = 217 for L-). Significant differences were observed in the type of anti-reflux procedure performed (p < 0.001), use of mesh (R- 70.2% vs. L- 59.0%, p = 0.019), and whether a Collis gastroplasty was performed (R- 4.3% vs. L- 10.2%, p = 0.023). No differences in 30-day readmission or reoperation rates, Clavien-Dindo complication rates, or 1-year hernia recurrence rates were observed. For elective cases, regardless of the type of anti-reflux procedure performed, a robotic approach was associated with a significantly greater cost (p < 0.002). Comparing all procedures, a statistically significant increase in cost was seen with a robotic approach (R- $29,706.88 vs. L- $23,457.07, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Complication rates and surgical outcomes between the two approaches were similar; however, cost is significantly increased when a robotic approach is utilized. Future studies are needed to delineate which drivers of cost are modifiable with the robot.

摘要

引言

前肠手术中机器人技术的应用日益广泛,引发了关于疗效、安全性和成本的问题。对许多人来说,成本仍然是采用机器人手术方法的一个障碍。作者旨在确定机器人(R-)与腹腔镜(L-)治疗食管旁疝修补术(PEHR)的成本差异。

方法

纳入2016年7月至2021年6月在大学健康网络接受PEHR的18岁及以上患者。感兴趣的变量包括30天结局、1年复发率以及几个成本变量,包括住院时间、手术室(OR)时间、可收费耗材和植入物、不可收费耗材以及间接成本。成本数据按类型、是否进行胃底折叠术以及手术的择期与急诊性质进行分层。统计分析包括参数分析和非参数分析,p < 0.05表示具有统计学意义。

结果

405例患者纳入研究(R-组188例,L-组217例)。在进行抗反流手术的类型(p < 0.001)、补片使用情况(R-组70.2% vs. L-组59.0%;p = 0.019)以及是否进行科利斯胃成形术(R-组4.3% vs. L-组10.2%;p = 0.023)方面观察到显著差异,但在30天再入院或再次手术率、Clavien-Dindo并发症发生率或1年疝复发率方面未观察到差异。对于择期病例,无论进行何种抗反流手术,机器人手术方法的成本均显著更高(p < 0.002)。比较所有手术,机器人手术方法的成本有统计学显著增加(R-组29,706.88美元 vs. L-组23,457.07美元;p < 0.001)。

结论

两种手术方法的并发症发生率和手术结局相似;然而,采用机器人手术方法时成本显著增加。未来需要开展研究来确定哪些成本驱动因素可通过机器人进行调整。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验