• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非创伤性腹部急症中的损伤控制手术:序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHEII)及曼海姆腹膜炎指数的预后价值

Damage control surgery in non-traumatic abdominal emergencies: prognostic value of SOFA, APACHEII, and Mannheim peritonitis index.

作者信息

Rasslan Roberto, de Oliveira Ferreira Fábio, Parra Jeammy Andrea Perez, da Costa Ferreira Novo Fernando, Menegozzo Carlos Augusto Metidieri, Alves Pedro Henrique Ferreira, Bertolli Eduardo, Damous Sérgio Henrique Bastos, Rasslan Samir, Utiyama Edivaldo Massazo

机构信息

Departament of Surgery, Division of General Surgery and Trauma, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, no. 255, 8th. Floor, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2025 Jan;77(1):255-262. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01984-3. Epub 2024 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-024-01984-3
PMID:39266908
Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the prognostic value of the SOFA, APACHE II, and MPI (Mannheim Peritonitis Index) scores in the indication for Damage Control Surgery (DCS) in non-trauma. Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing DCS between 2014 and 2019. SOFA and APACHE II scores were calculated using parameters preceding DCS, while MPI was based on surgical descriptions. Statistical analysis: Qualitative variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, and quantitative variables using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The Student's T test was employed for mean comparisons. The sample comprised 104 patients (59 males), with a median age of 63.5 years, of whom 52 (50%) were ASA IV. Operative findings leading to DCS included peritonitis (54; 51.9%), intestinal ischemia (39; 37.5%), inability to close the abdomen (8; 7.6%), and bleeding (3; 2.9%). The mortality rate was 75% (78/104). Thirty patients (28.8%) died after DCS; the remainder underwent one (35; 33.6%), two (21; 20.2%); three (8; 7.7%), and four or more (10;9.7%) revision procedures. The median lengths of ICU and hospital stays were 12.5 and 20.5 days, respectively. The median score values were as follows: SOFA: 12 (0-38), APACHE II: 25 (2-47), and MPI: 26 (8-43). Besides ASA classification (p = 0.03), mortality risk was influenced by: age (≤ 65 years vs. > 65 years; p = 0.04), SOFA (≤ 10 vs. > 10; p = 0.03), APACHE II (≤ 25 vs. > 25; p = 0.04), and MPI (≤ 25 vs. > 25; p = 0.003). The SOFA, APACHE II, and MPI scores proved to be valuable tools in the prognostic assessment of patients undergoing DCS in non-traumatic abdominal emergencies.

摘要

本研究旨在分析序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)以及曼海姆腹膜炎指数(MPI)评分在非创伤性损伤控制手术(DCS)指征中的预后价值。对2014年至2019年间接受DCS的患者进行回顾性分析。SOFA和APACHE II评分使用DCS前的参数计算,而MPI基于手术描述。统计分析:定性变量采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行比较,定量变量采用Pearson相关系数进行比较。采用学生t检验进行均值比较。样本包括104例患者(59例男性),中位年龄为63.5岁,其中52例(50%)为美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)IV级。导致DCS的手术发现包括腹膜炎(54例;51.9%)、肠缺血(39例;37.5%)、无法关腹(8例;7.6%)和出血(3例;2.9%)。死亡率为75%(78/104)。30例患者(28.8%)在DCS后死亡;其余患者接受了一次(35例;33.6%)、两次(21例;20.2%)、三次(8例;7.7%)以及四次或更多次(10例;9.7%)的翻修手术。重症监护病房(ICU)和住院时间的中位数分别为12.5天和20.5天。评分中位数如下:SOFA为12(0 - 38),APACHE II为25(2 - 47),MPI为26(8 - 43)。除ASA分级外(p = 0.03),死亡风险还受以下因素影响:年龄(≤65岁与>65岁;p = 0.04)、SOFA(≤10与>10;p = 0.03)、APACHE II(≤25与>25;p = 0.04)以及MPI(≤25与>25;p = 0.003)。SOFA、APACHE II和MPI评分被证明是评估非创伤性腹部急症接受DCS患者预后的有价值工具。

相似文献

1
Damage control surgery in non-traumatic abdominal emergencies: prognostic value of SOFA, APACHEII, and Mannheim peritonitis index.非创伤性腹部急症中的损伤控制手术:序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHEII)及曼海姆腹膜炎指数的预后价值
Updates Surg. 2025 Jan;77(1):255-262. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01984-3. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
2
Age, microbiology and prognostic scores help to differentiate between secondary and tertiary peritonitis.年龄、微生物学检查结果和预后评分有助于鉴别继发性腹膜炎和原发性腹膜炎。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009 Mar;394(2):265-71. doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0301-y. Epub 2008 Mar 15.
3
Damage Control Surgery for Non-traumatic Abdominal Emergencies.非创伤性腹部急症的损伤控制手术
World J Surg. 2018 Apr;42(4):965-973. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4262-6.
4
[Prognostic scores in peritonitis: the Mannheim Peritonitis Index or APACHE II?].[腹膜炎的预后评分:曼海姆腹膜炎指数还是急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II?]
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1994;379(6):347-52. doi: 10.1007/BF00191581.
5
Getting the invite list right: a discussion of sepsis severity scoring systems in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis and randomized trial inclusion criteria.邀请函名单的确定:严重复杂性腹腔内感染和随机临床试验纳入标准中脓毒症严重程度评分系统的讨论。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Apr 6;13:17. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0177-2. eCollection 2018.
6
Prognosis in intra-abdominal infections. Multivariate analysis on 604 patients.腹腔内感染的预后。对604例患者的多因素分析。
Arch Surg. 1996 Jun;131(6):641-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430180067014.
7
Mannheim Peritonitis Index and APACHE II--prediction of outcome in patients with peritonitis.曼海姆腹膜炎指数与急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II——腹膜炎患者预后的预测
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2010 Jan;16(1):27-32.
8
[The value of 2 distinct prognosis scores in patients with peritonitis. The Mannheim Peritonitis Index versus the Apache II score].[两种不同预后评分在腹膜炎患者中的价值。曼海姆腹膜炎指数与急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统II]
Chirurg. 1990 Apr;61(4):297-300.
9
Prognostic factors and scoring system for survival in colonic perforation.结肠穿孔患者生存的预后因素及评分系统
Hepatogastroenterology. 2005 May-Jun;52(63):761-4.
10
The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score is helpful in predicting the need of relaparotomies in patients with secondary peritonitis of colorectal origin.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 II 有助于预测结直肠来源的继发性腹膜炎患者再次剖腹手术的需求。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Jul 25;142:w13640. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13640. eCollection 2012.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with sepsis caused by intra-abdominal infection in the intensive care unit: a post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study in Korea.在重症监护病房中由腹腔内感染引起的脓毒症患者的临床结局和预后因素:韩国一项前瞻性队列研究的事后分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 19;22(1):953. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07837-x.
2
Acute mesenteric ischemia: updated guidelines of the World Society of Emergency Surgery.急性肠系膜缺血:世界急诊外科学会最新指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct 19;17(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00443-x.
3
Emergency Surgery Score as an Effective Risk Stratification Tool for Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgeries: A Narrative Review.
急诊手术评分作为急诊手术患者有效风险分层工具的叙述性综述
Cureus. 2022 Jun 23;14(6):e26226. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26226. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Damage Control Surgery may be a Safe Option for Severe Non-Trauma Peritonitis Management: Proposal of a New Decision-Making Algorithm.损伤控制外科可能是严重非创伤性腹膜炎管理的安全选择:新决策算法的提出。
World J Surg. 2021 Apr;45(4):1043-1052. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05854-y. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
Epidemiology of intra-abdominal infection and sepsis in critically ill patients: "AbSeS", a multinational observational cohort study and ESICM Trials Group Project.危重症患者腹腔内感染和脓毒症的流行病学:“AbSeS”,一项多中心观察性队列研究和 ESICM 临床试验组项目。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Dec;45(12):1703-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05819-3. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
6
Damage Control Surgery for Non-traumatic Abdominal Emergencies.非创伤性腹部急症的损伤控制手术
World J Surg. 2018 Apr;42(4):965-973. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4262-6.
7
Early Versus Delayed Source Control in Open Abdomen Management for Severe Intra-abdominal Infections: A Retrospective Analysis on 111 Cases.严重腹腔内感染开放性腹腔处理中早期与延迟源头控制的比较:111例回顾性分析
World J Surg. 2018 Mar;42(3):707-712. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4233-y.
8
The role of open abdomen in non-trauma patient: WSES Consensus Paper.非创伤患者应用开放性腹部的作用:WSES 共识文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Aug 14;12:39. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0146-1. eCollection 2017.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients.非创伤患者开放性腹部及临时腹部关闭技术的系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Surg. 2015 Apr;39(4):912-25. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2883-6.
10
Damage control surgery for abdominal emergencies.腹部急症的损伤控制性手术。
Br J Surg. 2014 Jan;101(1):e109-18. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9360. Epub 2013 Nov 25.