Shepherd Mary E, Gangakhedkar Raman R, Sahay Seema, Reynolds Steven J, Ghate Manisha V, Risbud Arun R, Paranjape Ramesh S, Bollinger Robert C, Mehendale Sanjay M
Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
J Health Popul Nutr. 2003 Sep;21(3):251-63.
Systematic disparities in rates of HIV incidence by socioeconomic status were assessed among men attending three sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics in Pune, India, to identify key policy-intervention points to increase health equity. Measures of socioeconomic status included level of education, family income, and occupation. From 1993 to 2000, 2,260 HIV-uninfected men who consented to participate in the study were followed on a quarterly basis. Proportional hazards regression analysis of incident HIV infection identified a statistically significant interaction between level of education and genital ulcer disease. Compared to the lowest-risk men without genital ulcer disease who completed high school, the relative risk (RR) for acquisition of HIV was 7.02 (p < 0.001) for illiterate men with genital ulcer disease, 3.62 (p < 0.001) for men with some education and genital ulcer disease, and 3.02 (p < 0.001) for men who completed high school and had genital ulcer disease. For men with no genital ulcer disease and those with no education RR was 1.09 (p = 0.84), and for men with primary/middle school it was 1.70 (p = 0.03). The study provides evidence that by enhancing access to treatment and interventions that include counselling, education, and provision of condoms for prevention of STDs, especially genital ulcer disease, among disadvantaged men, the disparity in rates of HIV incidence could be lessened considerably. Nevertheless, given the same level of knowledge on AIDS, the same level of risk behaviour, and the same level of biological co-factors, the most disadvantaged men still have higher rates of HIV incidence.
在印度浦那的三家性传播疾病(STD)诊所就诊的男性中,评估了按社会经济地位划分的艾滋病毒发病率的系统性差异,以确定增加健康公平性的关键政策干预点。社会经济地位的衡量指标包括教育水平、家庭收入和职业。从1993年到2000年,对2260名同意参与研究的未感染艾滋病毒的男性进行了季度随访。对艾滋病毒感染事件的比例风险回归分析确定,教育水平与生殖器溃疡疾病之间存在统计学上的显著相互作用。与没有生殖器溃疡疾病且完成高中学业的低风险男性相比,患有生殖器溃疡疾病的文盲男性感染艾滋病毒的相对风险(RR)为7.02(p < 0.001),有一定教育程度且患有生殖器溃疡疾病的男性为3.62(p < 0.001),完成高中学业且患有生殖器溃疡疾病的男性为3.02(p < 0.001)。对于没有生殖器溃疡疾病且没有受过教育的男性,RR为1.09(p = 0.84),对于小学/初中文化程度的男性,RR为1.70(p = 0.03)。该研究提供了证据表明,通过增加弱势男性获得包括咨询、教育和提供预防性病(尤其是生殖器溃疡疾病)的避孕套在内的治疗和干预措施的机会,可以大大减少艾滋病毒发病率的差异。然而,在艾滋病知识水平、风险行为水平和生物协同因素水平相同的情况下,最弱势的男性艾滋病毒发病率仍然较高。