de Freitas Marcos Roberto, Beltrão Rejane Targino Soares, Janson Guilherme, Henriques José Fernando Castanha, Cançado Rodrigo Hermont
Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Jan;125(1):78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.01.006.
The purpose of this study was to cephalometrically evaluate the long-term stability of anterior open bite extraction treatment in the permanent dentition after a mean period of 8.35 years. Cephalometric headfilms were obtained at pretreatment, posttreatment, and postretention stages from 31 patients who had undergone orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Two control groups were used. The first, with an age similar to that of the experimental group before treatment, was used only to characterize it. The second, with normal occlusion, was followed longitudinally for a period comparable with the posttreatment period and was used to compare changes during this period. The differences between the observation stages in the experimental group were analyzed with paired t tests, and the posttreatment changes were compared with the changes of the second control group with independent t tests. There was no statistically significant decrease of the obtained anterior overbite at the end of the posttreatment period. The primary factors that contributed to the nonsignificant decrease of the overbite were the normal vertical development of the maxillary and mandibular incisors, the smaller vertical development of the mandibular molars, and the consequent smaller increase in lower anterior face height, as compared with the control group in the long-term posttreatment period. Additionally, 74.2% of the sample had a "clinically stable" open bite correction.
本研究的目的是通过头影测量法评估恒牙列前牙开(牙合)拔牙矫治在平均8.35年的观察期后的长期稳定性。对31例接受固定矫治器正畸治疗的患者在治疗前、治疗后及保持后阶段获取头影测量X线片。设立了两个对照组。第一个对照组,年龄与治疗前实验组相似,仅用于描述实验组特征。第二个对照组,咬合正常,进行了与治疗后观察期相当的纵向随访,用于比较该时期的变化。实验组各观察阶段的差异采用配对t检验分析,治疗后的变化与第二个对照组的变化采用独立t检验比较。治疗后阶段结束时,所获得的前牙覆(牙合)没有统计学上的显著降低。与长期治疗后的对照组相比,导致覆(牙合)降低不显著的主要因素是上颌和下颌切牙的正常垂直生长、下颌磨牙较小的垂直生长以及随之而来的下前面高较小的增加。此外,74.2%的样本具有“临床稳定”的开(牙合)矫治效果。