• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恒牙列前牙开颌拔牙与不拔牙治疗的稳定性。

Stability of anterior open-bite extraction and nonextraction treatment in the permanent dentition.

作者信息

Janson Guilherme, Valarelli Fabrício Pinelli, Beltrão Rejane Targino Soares, de Freitas Marcos Roberto, Henriques José Fernando Castanha

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jun;129(6):768-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.031.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.031
PMID:16769495
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although stability of anterior open-bite extraction and nonextraction treatment has been investigated, results suggesting that extraction treatment is more stable have not been confronted. Therefore, the purpose of this cephalometric study was to compare the long-term stability of anterior open-bite extraction and nonextraction treatment in the permanent dentition.

METHODS

Group 1 consisted of 21 patients treated without extractions, and group 2 included 31 patients treated with extractions who had orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Cephalometric headplates were obtained at pretreatment, posttreatment, and postretention. The groups were compared at these 3 times and during the treatment and posttreatment periods with independent t tests. The number of patients with a clinically significant relapse of the open bite was compared between the groups with chi-square tests.

RESULTS

During treatment, the maxillary incisors had greater retraction amounts, and the mandibular incisors had greater retraction and lingual tipping, and less extrusion in the extraction group. In the posttreatment period, the extraction group demonstrated statistically greater stability of the overbite. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the percentages of patients with clinically significant relapse of the open bite between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Open-bite extraction treatment has greater stability of the overbite than open-bite nonextraction treatment.

摘要

引言

尽管已对前牙开颌拔牙矫治和非拔牙矫治的稳定性进行了研究,但表明拔牙矫治更稳定的结果尚未得到验证。因此,这项头影测量研究的目的是比较恒牙列中前牙开颌拔牙矫治和非拔牙矫治的长期稳定性。

方法

第1组由21例非拔牙矫治的患者组成,第2组包括31例采用固定矫治器进行正畸治疗的拔牙矫治患者。在治疗前、治疗后及保持后获取头影测量片。采用独立t检验在这三个时间点以及治疗期间和治疗后阶段对两组进行比较。采用卡方检验比较两组中出现具有临床意义的开颌复发的患者数量。

结果

在治疗期间,拔牙组上颌切牙的内收量更大,下颌切牙的内收和舌倾程度更大,且伸长较少。在治疗后阶段,拔牙组的覆颌稳定性在统计学上更高。然而,两组中出现具有临床意义的开颌复发的患者百分比在统计学上无显著差异。

结论

前牙开颌拔牙矫治比前牙开颌非拔牙矫治具有更高的覆颌稳定性。

相似文献

1
Stability of anterior open-bite extraction and nonextraction treatment in the permanent dentition.恒牙列前牙开颌拔牙与不拔牙治疗的稳定性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jun;129(6):768-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.031.
2
Relapse of anterior crowding in patients treated with extraction and nonextraction of premolars.拔除和不拔除前磨牙治疗患者的前牙拥挤复发情况。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jun;129(6):775-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.022.
3
Stability of anterior open bite nonextraction treatment in the permanent dentition.恒牙列前牙开(牙合)非拔牙治疗的稳定性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Sep;124(3):265-76; quiz 340. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00449-9.
4
Orthodontic treatment of anterior open-bite malocclusion: stability 10 years postretention.正畸治疗前牙开颌畸形:保持 10 年后的稳定性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Mar;137(3):302.e1-8; discussion 302-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.020.
5
Long-term stability of anterior open bite extraction treatment in the permanent dentition.恒牙列前牙开颌拔牙治疗的长期稳定性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Jan;125(1):78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.01.006.
6
Evaluation of root resorption after open bite treatment with and without extractions.拔牙与不拔牙治疗开(牙合)后牙根吸收的评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Aug;132(2):143.e15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.018.
7
Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.安氏II类错牙合患者上颌第二磨牙拔除与不拔除治疗的头影测量比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Dec;120(6):608-13; quiz 677. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.119805.
8
Protocol for the treatment of anterior open bite patients: an evaluation.前牙开颌患者的治疗方案:一项评估
World J Orthod. 2007 Fall;8(3):285-99.
9
Alignment stability in Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.采用拔除两颗前磨牙和四颗前磨牙矫治方案治疗的安氏II类错牙合的咬合稳定性
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Aug;130(2):189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.037.
10
Treatment effects of a modified quad-helix in patients with dentoskeletal open bites.改良四螺旋矫治器对牙颌面开(牙合)患者的治疗效果
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Jun;129(6):734-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment outcomes and short-term stability in adult anterior openbite patients treated with or without extractions: a National Dental Practice-Based Research Network study.拔牙与不拔牙治疗成人前牙开颌患者的治疗效果及短期稳定性:一项基于全国牙科实践的研究网络研究
Angle Orthod. 2025 Mar 1;95(2):149-156. doi: 10.2319/070224-518.1.
2
Strategic treatment planning for anterior open bite: A comprehensive approach.前牙开颌的战略治疗计划:一种综合方法。
J Dent Sci. 2024 Jul;19(3):1328-1337. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.04.001. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
Management Strategies for Open Bite Relapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
开牙合复发的管理策略:系统评价与Meta分析
Cureus. 2024 Mar 16;16(3):e56285. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56285. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Long-term effectiveness of non-surgical open-bite treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非手术开放性咬合治疗的长期疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prog Orthod. 2023 Jun 1;24(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00467-2.
5
Anterior openbite malocclusion in adults.成人前牙开颌。
Angle Orthod. 2022 Jan 1;92(1):27-35. doi: 10.2319/071221-549.1.
6
The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Adult Anterior Open Bite Study: Treatment success.国家牙科实践为基础的研究网络成人前牙开颌研究:治疗成功。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Dec;158(6):e137-e150. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.07.033.
7
Stability of anterior open bite treatment with molar intrusion using skeletal anchorage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.采用骨锚定技术进行磨牙远移治疗前牙开颌的稳定性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prog Orthod. 2020 Sep 5;21(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00328-2.
8
Comprehensive approach to simultaneous molar intrusion and canine retraction in the treatment of Class II anterior open bite using miniscrew anchorage.使用微螺钉支抗同时磨牙压低和尖牙远中移动治疗安氏II类前牙开(牙合)的综合方法
Dental Press J Orthod. 2020 May;25(3):e1. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.3.30.e1-12.onl. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
9
The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Adult Anterior Open Bite Study: Treatment recommendations and their association with patient and practitioner characteristics.国家牙科实践为基础的研究网络成人前牙开颌研究:治疗建议及其与患者和医生特征的关系。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Sep;156(3):312-325. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.005.
10
Three-dimensional analysis of condylar changes in surgical correction for open bite patients with skeletal class II and class III malocclusions.骨性 II 类和 III 类错(牙合)开(牙合)患者手术矫正中髁突变化的三维分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;48(6):739-745. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Feb 1.