Lux Christopher J, Conradt Christian, Burden Donald, Komposch Gerda
Department of Orthodontics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Angle Orthod. 2003 Dec;73(6):674-85. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0674:DAWAMB>2.0.CO;2.
The aim of the study was to analyze the transverse morphology and development of the dental arches and skeletal mandibular-maxillary bases in untreated Class II malocclusions. Using the records of the Belfast Growth Study, a Class II division 1 group (II/1) and a Class II division 2 group (II/2) were compared with a Class I group and a control group with good occlusion. On posteroanterior cephalograms, maxillary skeletal base width and bigonial and biantegonial widths were determined at two-year intervals between seven and 15 years. Maxillary and mandibular intermolar widths were measured on the associated study casts. As a result, maxillary skeletal base widths were smallest in the Class II/1 subjects. No statistically significant differences were found among the groups for the skeletal mandibular widths. With respect to the development of the dental arches, maxillary intermolar widths were smaller in the Class II/1 group than in the Class I and the good-occlusion groups. These group differences were present for the total period of observation, ie, seven to 15 years, and statistically significant at most ages. When the relative difference between the maxillary and the mandibular intermolar widths was examined, the Class II/1 cases were found to have the largest average difference (about -2.5 mm for boys and -1.5 mm for girls), indicating a relatively narrow maxillary arch. Less pronounced molar differences were found in the Class II/2 group. In the Class II/1 subjects the deviations in molar differences observed at 15 years of age were established already at 7 years of age and maintained during 7 and 15 years of age.
本研究的目的是分析未经治疗的安氏II类错牙合畸形患者牙弓及上下颌骨基骨的横向形态和发育情况。利用贝尔法斯特生长研究的记录,将安氏II类1分类组(II/1)和安氏II类2分类组(II/2)与安氏I类组和咬合良好的对照组进行比较。在头颅后前位片上,于7至15岁期间每隔两年测定上颌骨基骨宽度、下颌角间宽度和下颌角前切迹间宽度。在相关研究模型上测量上颌和下颌磨牙间宽度。结果显示,安氏II/1组患者的上颌骨基骨宽度最小。各组下颌骨基骨宽度之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。关于牙弓的发育,安氏II/1组的上颌磨牙间宽度小于安氏I类组和咬合良好组。这些组间差异在整个观察期(即7至15岁)均存在,且在大多数年龄具有统计学意义。当检查上颌和下颌磨牙间宽度的相对差异时,发现安氏II/1组病例的平均差异最大(男孩约为-2.5mm,女孩约为-1.5mm),表明上颌牙弓相对狭窄。安氏II/2组的磨牙差异不太明显。在安氏II/1组患者中,15岁时观察到的磨牙差异偏差在7岁时就已出现,并在7至15岁期间持续存在。