Suppr超能文献

正常咬合、安氏II类1分类和安氏II类2分类中的牙弓及牙槽弓宽度

Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion, class II division 1 and class II division 2.

作者信息

Uysal Tancan, Memili Badel, Usumez Serdar, Sari Zafer

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2005 Nov;75(6):941-7. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[941:DAAAWI]2.0.CO;2.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the transverse dimensions of the dental arches and alveolar arches in the canine, premolar, and molar regions of Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusion groups with normal occlusion subjects. This study was performed using measurements on dental casts of 150 normal occlusion (mean age: 21.6 +/- 2.6 years), 106 Class II division 1 (mean age: 17.2 +/- 2.4 years), and 108 Class II division 2 (mean age: 18.5 +/- 2.9 years) malocclusion subjects. Independent-samples t-test was applied for comparisons of the groups. These findings indicate that the maxillary interpremolar width, maxillary canine, premolar and molar alveolar widths, and mandibular premolar and molar alveolar widths were significantly narrower in subjects with Class II division 1 malocclusion than in the normal occlusion sample. The maxillary interpremolar width, canine and premolar alveolar widths, and all mandibular alveolar widths were significantly narrower in the Class II division 2 group than in the normal occlusion sample. The mandibular intercanine and interpremolar widths were narrower and the maxillary intermolar width measurement was larger in the Class II division 2 subjects when compared with the Class II division 1 subjects. Maxillary molar teeth in subjects with Class II division 1 malocclusions tend to incline to the buccal to compensate the insufficient alveolar base. For that reason, rapid maxillary expansion rather than slow expansion may be considered before or during the treatment of Class II division 1 patients.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较安氏II类1分类错牙合组和安氏II类2分类错牙合组犬齿、前磨牙和磨牙区牙弓及牙槽弓的横向尺寸与正常牙合受试者的差异。本研究通过对150名正常牙合(平均年龄:21.6±2.6岁)、106名安氏II类1分类错牙合(平均年龄:17.2±2.4岁)和108名安氏II类2分类错牙合(平均年龄:18.5±2.9岁)错牙合受试者的石膏模型进行测量来开展。采用独立样本t检验对各组进行比较。这些结果表明,安氏II类1分类错牙合受试者的上颌前磨牙间宽度、上颌尖牙、前磨牙和磨牙牙槽宽度以及下颌前磨牙和磨牙牙槽宽度均显著窄于正常牙合样本。安氏II类2分类组的上颌前磨牙间宽度、尖牙和前磨牙牙槽宽度以及所有下颌牙槽宽度均显著窄于正常牙合样本。与安氏II类1分类受试者相比,安氏II类2分类受试者的下颌尖牙间和前磨牙间宽度较窄,而上颌磨牙间宽度测量值较大。安氏II类1分类错牙合受试者的上颌磨牙倾向于向颊侧倾斜以补偿牙槽基骨不足。因此,在治疗安氏II类1分类患者之前或治疗期间,可考虑采用快速上颌扩弓而非慢速扩弓。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验