Rogowski Jeannette A, Horbar Jeffrey D, Staiger Douglas O, Kenny Michael, Carpenter Joseph, Geppert Jeffrey
RAND, Arlington, Va 22202, USA.
JAMA. 2004 Jan 14;291(2):202-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.2.202.
Evidence-based selective referral strategies are being used by an increasing number of insurers to ensure that medical care is provided by high-quality providers. In the absence of direct-quality measures based on patient outcomes, the standards currently in place for many conditions rely on indirect-quality measures such as patient volume.
To assess the potential usefulness of volume as a quality indicator for very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants and compare volume with other potential indicators based on readily available hospital characteristics and patient outcomes.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective study of 94 110 VLBW infants weighing 501 to 1500 g born in 332 Vermont Oxford Network hospitals with neonatal intensive care units between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2000.
Mortality among VLBW infants prior to discharge home; detailed case-mix adjustment was performed by using patient characteristics available immediately after birth.
In hospitals with less than 50 annual admissions of VLBW infants, an additional 10 admissions were associated with an 11% reduction in mortality (95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-16%; P<.001). The annual volume of admissions only explained 9% of the variation across hospitals in mortality rates, and other readily available hospital characteristics explained an additional 7%. Historical volume was not significantly related to mortality rates in 1999-2000, implying that volume cannot prospectively identify high-quality providers. In contrast, hospitals in the lowest mortality quintile between 1995 and 1998 were found to have significantly lower mortality rates in 1999-2000 (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.55-0.76; P<.001) and hospitals in the highest mortality quintile between 1995 and 1998 had significantly higher mortality rates in 1999-2000 (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.16-1.64; P<.001). The percentage of hospital-level variation in mortality in 1999-2000 that was forecasted by the highest and lowest quintiles based on patient mortality was 34% compared with only 1% for the highest and lowest quintiles of volume.
Referral of VLBW infants based on indirect-quality indicators such as patient volume may be minimally effective. Direct measures based on patient outcomes are more useful quality indicators for the purposes of selective referral, as they are better predictors of future mortality rates among providers and could save more lives.
越来越多的保险公司采用基于证据的选择性转诊策略,以确保医疗服务由高质量的医疗机构提供。在缺乏基于患者预后的直接质量衡量标准的情况下,目前许多疾病的标准依赖于诸如患者数量等间接质量衡量标准。
评估患者数量作为极低出生体重(VLBW)婴儿质量指标的潜在效用,并将患者数量与基于医院现有特征和患者预后的其他潜在指标进行比较。
设计、地点和参与者:一项回顾性研究,研究对象为1995年1月1日至2000年12月31日期间在佛蒙特牛津网络的332家设有新生儿重症监护病房的医院出生的94110名体重在501至1500克之间的VLBW婴儿。
VLBW婴儿出院前的死亡率;通过使用出生后立即获得的患者特征进行详细的病例组合调整。
在每年收治VLBW婴儿少于50例的医院中,每增加10例收治病例,死亡率降低11%(95%置信区间[CI],5%-16%;P<0.001)。每年的收治量仅解释了各医院死亡率差异的9%,其他医院现有特征又解释了7%。1999 - 2000年的历史收治量与死亡率无显著相关性,这意味着收治量无法前瞻性地识别高质量的医疗机构。相比之下,1995年至1998年死亡率最低的五分之一的医院在1999 - 2000年的死亡率显著较低(优势比[OR],0.64;95%CI,0.55 - 0.76;P<0.001),而1995年至1998年死亡率最高的五分之一的医院在1999 - 2000年的死亡率显著较高(OR,1.37;95%CI,1.16 - 1.64;P<0.001)。基于患者死亡率的最高和最低五分位数预测的1999 - 2000年医院层面死亡率变化的百分比为34%,而基于收治量的最高和最低五分位数预测的仅为1%。
基于患者数量等间接质量指标转诊VLBW婴儿可能效果甚微。基于患者预后的直接衡量标准对于选择性转诊而言是更有用的质量指标,因为它们能更好地预测医疗机构未来的死亡率,并且可以挽救更多生命。