• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甘蔗品种中固氮葡糖醋杆菌的种群动态及其对植物生长的影响。

Population dynamics of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus in sugarcane cultivars and its effect on plant growth.

作者信息

Muñoz-Rojas J, Caballero-Mellado J

机构信息

Programa de Ecología Molecular y Microbiana, Centro de Investigación sobre Fijación de Nitrógeno, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ap. Postal 565-A, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.

出版信息

Microb Ecol. 2003 Nov;46(4):454-64. doi: 10.1007/s00248-003-0110-3. Epub 2003 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00248-003-0110-3
PMID:14722690
Abstract

Different experiments have estimated that the contribution of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is largely variable among sugarcane cultivars. Which bacteria are the most important in sugarcane-associated BNF is unknown. However, Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus has been suggested as a strong candidate responsible for the BNF observed. In the present study, bacteria-free micropropagated plantlets of five sugarcane cultivars were inoculated with three G. diazotrophicus strains belonging to different genotypes. Bacterial colonization was monitored under different nitrogen fertilization levels and at different stages of plant growth. Analysis of the population dynamics of G. diazotrophicus strains in the different sugarcane varieties showed that the bacterial populations decreased drastically in relation to plant age, regardless of the nitrogen fertilization level, bacterial genotype or sugarcane cultivars. However, the persistence of the three strains was significantly longer in some cultivars (e.g., MEX 57-473) than in others (e.g., MY 55-14). In addition, some strains (e.g., PAl 5(T)) persisted for longer periods in higher numbers than other strains (e.g., PAl 3) inside plants of all the cultivars tested. Indeed, the study showed that the inoculation of G. diazotrophicus may be beneficial for sugarcane plant growth, but this response is dependent both on the G. diazotrophicus genotype and the sugarcane variety. The most positive response to inoculation was observed with the combination of strain PAl 5(T) and the variety MEX 57-473. Although the positive effect on sugarcane growth apparently occurred by mechanisms other than nitrogen fixation, the results show the importance of the sugarcane variety for the persistence of the plant-bacteria interaction, and it could explain the different rates of BNF estimated among sugarcane cultivars.

摘要

不同的实验估计,生物固氮(BNF)的贡献在甘蔗品种间差异很大。在与甘蔗相关的生物固氮中,哪些细菌最为重要尚不清楚。然而,固氮葡糖醋杆菌被认为是观察到的生物固氮的有力候选者。在本研究中,用属于不同基因型的三株固氮葡糖醋杆菌菌株接种了五个甘蔗品种的无菌微繁殖苗。在不同的氮肥水平和植物生长的不同阶段监测细菌定殖情况。对不同甘蔗品种中固氮葡糖醋杆菌菌株的种群动态分析表明,无论氮肥水平、细菌基因型或甘蔗品种如何,细菌种群数量都随植株年龄的增长而急剧下降。然而,这三株菌株在某些品种(如MEX 57-473)中的持续存在时间明显长于其他品种(如MY 55-14)。此外,在所有测试品种的植株内,一些菌株(如PAl 5(T))比其他菌株(如PAl 3)以更高的数量持续存在更长时间。事实上,该研究表明接种固氮葡糖醋杆菌可能有利于甘蔗植株生长,但这种反应既取决于固氮葡糖醋杆菌的基因型,也取决于甘蔗品种。接种后最积极的反应出现在菌株PAl 5(T)和品种MEX 57-473的组合中。虽然对甘蔗生长的积极影响显然是通过固氮以外的机制发生的,但结果表明甘蔗品种对植物-细菌相互作用的持续存在很重要,这可以解释不同甘蔗品种间估计的生物固氮率不同的原因。

相似文献

1
Population dynamics of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus in sugarcane cultivars and its effect on plant growth.甘蔗品种中固氮葡糖醋杆菌的种群动态及其对植物生长的影响。
Microb Ecol. 2003 Nov;46(4):454-64. doi: 10.1007/s00248-003-0110-3. Epub 2003 Aug 14.
2
N-fertilizer saving by the inoculation of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and Herbaspirillum sp. in micropropagated sugarcane plants.通过接种固氮葡糖醋杆菌和草螺菌属在微繁殖甘蔗植株中节省氮肥。
Microbiol Res. 2006;161(3):238-45. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2005.08.007. Epub 2005 Nov 14.
3
Quantitative proteomic analysis of the interaction between the endophytic plant-growth-promoting bacterium Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and sugarcane.内生植物促生菌 Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus 与甘蔗相互作用的定量蛋白质组学分析。
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2011 May;24(5):562-76. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-08-10-0178.
4
The decrease in the population of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus in sugarcane after nitrogen fertilization is related to plant physiology in split root experiments.在分根实验中,氮肥施用后甘蔗中固氮葡糖醋杆菌数量的减少与植物生理学有关。
Rev Argent Microbiol. 2015 Oct-Dec;47(4):335-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ram.2015.09.004. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
5
Drought tolerance conferred to sugarcane by association with Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus: a transcriptomic view of hormone pathways.与固氮葡糖醋杆菌共生赋予甘蔗耐旱性:激素途径的转录组学视角
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 9;9(12):e114744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114744. eCollection 2014.
6
Ecological occurrence of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and nitrogen-fixing Acetobacteraceae members: their possible role in plant growth promotion.固氮葡糖醋杆菌和固氮醋酸杆菌科成员的生态分布:它们在促进植物生长中的可能作用。
Microb Ecol. 2008 Jan;55(1):130-40. doi: 10.1007/s00248-007-9258-6. Epub 2007 Jun 17.
7
Antagonism of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus (a sugarcane endosymbiont) against Xanthomonas albilineans (pathogen) studied in alginate-immobilized sugarcane stalk tissues.在海藻酸钠固定化甘蔗茎组织中研究了固氮葡糖醋杆菌(一种甘蔗内共生菌)对白叶病菌(病原体)的拮抗作用。
J Biosci Bioeng. 2005 Apr;99(4):366-71. doi: 10.1263/jbb.99.366.
8
Antagonism among Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus strains in culture media and in endophytic association.葡糖醋杆菌固氮菌株在培养基中以及内生共生时的拮抗作用。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005 Sep 1;54(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.femsec.2005.02.011.
9
Development and nitrate reductase activity of sugarcane inoculated with five diazotrophic strains.接种五种固氮菌株的甘蔗的发育及硝酸还原酶活性
Arch Microbiol. 2017 Aug;199(6):863-873. doi: 10.1007/s00203-017-1357-2. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
10
Complete genome sequence of the sugarcane nitrogen-fixing endophyte Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus Pal5.甘蔗固氮内生菌重氮营养醋杆菌Pal5的全基因组序列
BMC Genomics. 2009 Sep 23;10:450. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-450.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Inoculation of a Diazotrophic Bacterial Consortium on the Indigenous Bacterial Community Structure of Sugarcane Apoplast Fluid.接种固氮细菌混合菌剂对甘蔗质外体液本土细菌群落结构的影响。
Curr Microbiol. 2021 Aug;78(8):3079-3091. doi: 10.1007/s00284-021-02571-0. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
2
Microbial inoculants: reviewing the past, discussing the present and previewing an outstanding future for the use of beneficial bacteria in agriculture.微生物接种剂:回顾过去,探讨现状,展望有益细菌在农业中应用的美好未来。
AMB Express. 2019 Dec 21;9(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13568-019-0932-0.
3
Molecular Analyses of the Distribution and Function of Diazotrophic Rhizobia and Methanotrophs in the Tissues and Rhizosphere of Non-Leguminous Plants.

本文引用的文献

1
Improved methodology for isolation of Acetobacter diazotrophicus and confirmation of its endophytic habitat.改良的固氮醋杆菌分离方法及其内生栖息地的确认。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1994 Jul;10(4):401-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00144460.
2
Genetic Structure of Acetobacter diazotrophicus Populations and Identification of a New Genetically Distant Group.固氮醋杆菌种群的遗传结构及一个新的遗传上差异较大的种群的鉴定。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Aug;61(8):3008-13. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.8.3008-3013.1995.
3
Limited Genetic Diversity in the Endophytic Sugarcane Bacterium Acetobacter diazotrophicus.
非豆科植物组织和根际中固氮根瘤菌和甲烷氧化菌的分布及功能的分子分析
Plants (Basel). 2019 Oct 11;8(10):408. doi: 10.3390/plants8100408.
4
Desiccation-induced viable but nonculturable state in Pseudomonas putida KT2440, a survival strategy.干燥诱导的假单胞菌 KT2440 可存活但非可培养状态,一种生存策略。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 19;14(7):e0219554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219554. eCollection 2019.
5
Plant probiotic bacteria: solutions to feed the world.植物益生菌:养活世界的解决方案。
AIMS Microbiol. 2017 Jun 21;3(3):502-524. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.502. eCollection 2017.
6
Compatible bacterial mixture, tolerant to desiccation, improves maize plant growth.耐干燥的兼容细菌混合物可促进玉米植株生长。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 8;12(11):e0187913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187913. eCollection 2017.
7
The persistence and performance of phosphate-solubilizing qzr14 in a cucumber soil.解磷菌qzr14在黄瓜土壤中的持久性和性能
3 Biotech. 2017 Oct;7(5):294. doi: 10.1007/s13205-017-0926-z. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
8
Biofertilizers: a potential approach for sustainable agriculture development.生物肥料:可持续农业发展的潜在途径。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Feb;24(4):3315-3335. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-8104-0. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
9
Identification of Genes Involved in Indole-3-Acetic Acid Biosynthesis by PAL5 Strain Using Transposon Mutagenesis.利用转座子诱变技术通过PAL5菌株鉴定参与吲哚-3-乙酸生物合成的基因
Front Microbiol. 2016 Oct 7;7:1572. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01572. eCollection 2016.
10
Tyrosine-Coordinated P-Cluster in G. diazotrophicus Nitrogenase: Evidence for the Importance of O-Based Ligands in Conformationally Gated Electron Transfer.谷氨酸棒杆菌固氮酶中酪氨酸配位的 P 簇:O 基配体在构象门控电子转移中重要性的证据。
J Am Chem Soc. 2016 Aug 17;138(32):10124-7. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b06783. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
内生甘蔗固氮菌遗传多样性有限。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 May;60(5):1532-7. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.5.1532-1537.1994.
4
Improved Medium for Isolation of Azospirillum spp.改进的丛枝菌根真菌属(Azospirillum spp.)分离培养基
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Oct;44(4):990-1. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.4.990-991.1982.
5
A Nitrogen-Fixing Endophyte of Sugarcane Stems (A New Role for the Apoplast).甘蔗茎的一种固氮内生菌(质外体的新作用)
Plant Physiol. 1994 Aug;105(4):1139-1147. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.4.1139.
6
Developmental changes in cell and tissue water relations parameters in storage parenchyma of sugarcane.甘蔗贮藏薄壁组织中细胞与组织水分关系参数的发育变化
Plant Physiol. 1991;96(3):794-801. doi: 10.1104/pp.96.3.794.
7
Further observations on the interaction between sugar cane and Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus under laboratory and greenhouse conditions.在实验室和温室条件下对甘蔗与固氮葡糖杆菌之间相互作用的进一步观察
J Exp Bot. 2001 Apr;52(357):747-60. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/52.357.747.
8
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of Saccharum officinarum L. (sugarcane) during its growth for sucrose content.
Indian J Exp Biol. 2000 Oct;38(10):1062-5.
9
Comparison of benefit to sugarcane plant growth and 15N2 incorporation following inoculation of sterile plants with Acetobacter diazotrophicus wild-type and Nif- mutants strains.用野生型固氮醋杆菌和固氮酶突变株接种无菌甘蔗植株后,对甘蔗植株生长和15N2掺入的益处比较。
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2001 Mar;14(3):358-66. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.3.358.
10
Natural Endophytic Occurrence of Acetobacter diazotrophicus in Pineapple Plants.菠萝植株中固氮醋杆菌的自然内生存在情况。
Microb Ecol. 2000 Jan;39(1):49-55. doi: 10.1007/s002489900190.