• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多个数字与字母比较:数字与字母记忆中的方向性和可及性

Multiple number and letter comparison: directionality and accessibility in numeric and alphabetic memories.

作者信息

Jou Jerwen

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Anthropology, The University of Texas-Pan American, Edinburg 78541-2999, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychol. 2003 Winter;116(4):543-79.

PMID:14723244
Abstract

In 3 experiments, subjects made comparativejudgments on a set of 2 numbers or letters, 3 numbers or letters, or 5 numbers or letters. Numeric and alphabetic serial order memories were contrasted. Three aspects of serial order memory processes were identified: computational complexity, directionality, and accessibility. Computational complexity is the number of algorithmic steps involved in identifying a target. Directional bias is measured as the speed differences in identifying serial targets of equal computational complexity in a stimulus array. Memory accessibility is measured as the numeric and alphabetic serial position effects. Subjects had a slight directional bias favoring backward ordering for single digits but no bias in 2-digit number ordering, in contrast to a strong forward directional advantage in letter ordering. The speed of number access was found to steadily and evenly decrease along the numeric scale, in contrast to a systematic pattern of variations in alphabet access along the alphabetic scale. Finally, the middle item effect (the middle item in a multi-item array is identified most slowly) found in Jou's (1997) multiple-letter comparison study was generalized to numbers.

摘要

在3个实验中,受试者对一组2个数字或字母、3个数字或字母或5个数字或字母进行比较判断。对数字和字母序列顺序记忆进行了对比。确定了序列顺序记忆过程的三个方面:计算复杂性、方向性和可及性。计算复杂性是识别目标所涉及的算法步骤数量。方向偏差通过在刺激阵列中识别具有相同计算复杂性的序列目标时的速度差异来衡量。记忆可及性通过数字和字母序列位置效应来衡量。与字母排序中强烈的向前方向优势相反,受试者对单个数字有轻微的向后排序方向偏差,但在两位数排序中没有偏差。发现数字访问速度沿数字标度稳定且均匀地下降,这与字母访问沿字母标度的系统变化模式形成对比。最后,Jou(1997年)的多字母比较研究中发现的中间项效应(多项目阵列中的中间项识别最慢)被推广到数字。

相似文献

1
Multiple number and letter comparison: directionality and accessibility in numeric and alphabetic memories.多个数字与字母比较:数字与字母记忆中的方向性和可及性
Am J Psychol. 2003 Winter;116(4):543-79.
2
From numbers to letters: feedback regularization in visual word recognition.从数字到字母:视觉词识别中的反馈正则化。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Apr;48(5):1343-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.037. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
3
Adult counting is resource demanding.成人计数需要资源。
Br J Psychol. 2004 Feb;95(Pt 1):19-30. doi: 10.1348/000712604322779433.
4
Arabic digit naming speed: task context and redundancy gain.阿拉伯数字命名速度:任务情境与冗余增益
Cognition. 2008 Apr;107(1):218-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.10.001. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
5
Holistic or compositional representation of two-digit numbers? Evidence from the distance, magnitude, and SNARC effects in a number-matching task.两位数的整体表征还是组合表征?来自数字匹配任务中距离、大小和SNARC效应的证据。
Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1525-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
6
Short-term consolidation of individual identities leads to Lag-1 sparing.个体身份的短期巩固导致Lag-1保留。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Jun;33(3):593-609. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.593.
7
A comparison of letter and digit processing in letter-by-letter reading.逐字阅读中字母与数字处理的比较。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008 Jan;14(1):164-73. doi: 10.1017/S1355617708080119.
8
No age differences in complex memory search: older adults search as efficiently as younger adults.在复杂记忆搜索方面不存在年龄差异:老年人的搜索效率与年轻人一样高。
Psychol Aging. 2009 Mar;24(1):105-15. doi: 10.1037/a0013751.
9
Numerical order and quantity processing in number comparison.数字比较中的数字顺序与数量处理。
Cognition. 2006 Jan;98(3):273-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.002.
10
Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, and symbols.字母、数字和符号识别中的系列位置效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Apr;35(2):480-98. doi: 10.1037/a0013027.

引用本文的文献

1
Generality of a congruity effect in judgements of relative order.相对顺序判断中一致性效应的普遍性。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Oct;42(7):1086-105. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0426-x.
2
Effects of pitch on auditory number comparisons.音高对听觉数字比较的影响。
Psychol Res. 2015 May;79(3):389-400. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0571-7. Epub 2014 May 16.
3
Is order the defining feature of magnitude representation? An ERP study on learning numerical magnitude and spatial order of artificial symbols.顺序是数量表示的决定性特征吗?一项关于人工符号数量和空间顺序学习的 ERP 研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049565. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
4
Semantic alignment and number comparison.语义对齐和数量比较。
Psychol Res. 2012 Jan;76(1):119-28. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0331-x. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
5
Processing of order information for numbers and months.数字和月份订单信息的处理。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Jul;37(5):644-54. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.5.644.