Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, 9 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, S7N 5A5, Canada.
Psychol Res. 2012 Jan;76(1):119-28. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0331-x. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
Are the quantity representations activated by Arabic digits influenced by semantic context? We developed a novel paradigm to examine semantic alignment effects (e.g., Bassok et al. in J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34:343-352, 2008) in number comparison. A horizontal word pair (either less more or few many) appeared for 480 ms to prime either relative magnitude (less more) or quantity (few many). Then a horizontal pair of single digits that were either successors (near) or differed by at least four (far) appeared above the word pair. Participants indicated verbally whether or not the word and digit pairs were congruent with respect to left-to-right ascending or descending relative magnitude. The RT advantage for far number pairs compared to near pairs (the distance effect) was greater with magnitude primes (81 ms) than quantity primes (17 ms), demonstrating a semantic alignment effect. This effect disappeared in Experiment 2 in which participants received identical stimuli but named the larger of the two digits and were free to ignore the primes. Nonetheless, mean RT in Experiment 2 was faster with prime and target pairs both ascending or both descending, but only with quantity primes. This prime-dependent order-congruity effect suggests that semantic alignment with respect to numerical order affected number comparison in Experiment 2. The results thereby demonstrate that number comparison exhibits task-dependent semantic alignment effects and recruits distinct numerical representations as a function of semantic context (e.g., Cohen Kadosh and Walsh in Behav Brain Sci 32:313-373, 2009).
阿拉伯数字所表示的数量表征是否受语义语境的影响?我们开发了一种新的范式来检验数量比较中的语义对齐效应(例如,Bassok 等人在《实验心理学杂志:学习、记忆与认知》34:343-352, 2008 年)。一个水平方向的单词对(小于/多于或少/多)出现 480 毫秒,以启动相对大小(小于/多于)或数量(少/多)。然后,在单词对上方出现一对水平方向的单个数字,这些数字要么是相邻的(近),要么相差至少四个(远)。参与者口头表明单词和数字对是否在从左到右的相对大小上升或下降方面是一致的。与近数字对相比,远数字对的反应时优势(距离效应)在大小启动时更大(81 毫秒),而在数量启动时更小(17 毫秒),这表明存在语义对齐效应。在实验 2 中,这种效应消失了,在实验 2 中,参与者收到了相同的刺激,但只需要说出两个数字中较大的一个,并且可以自由忽略启动词。尽管如此,在实验 2 中,当启动词和目标词都上升或都下降时,平均反应时会更快,但只有在数量启动词时才会更快。这种依赖于启动词的顺序一致性效应表明,数量比较在实验 2 中受到了与数值顺序相关的语义对齐的影响。结果表明,数量比较表现出任务依赖的语义对齐效应,并根据语义语境招募了不同的数值表示(例如,Cohen Kadosh 和 Walsh 在《行为与脑科学》32:313-373, 2009 年)。
Psychol Res. 2011-4-2
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009-11
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019-11
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011-2
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019-4
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016-6
Cognition. 2008-4
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001-2
Psychol Res. 2015-5
Scientifica (Cairo). 2012
Behav Brain Sci. 2009-8
Can J Exp Psychol. 2009-6
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009-4
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008-3
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008-3
Cognition. 2006-1
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003-4
Psychol Res. 2001-11