Hamilton Glenys A, Carroll Diane L
Research and Education, Lancaster, MA 01523, USA.
J Clin Nurs. 2004 Feb;13(2):194-200. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00846.x.
The implantable cardioverter defibrillator shows superiority over conventional pharmacological therapy. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator has been implanted with increasing frequency in patients who are either at risk for or have experienced a life-threatening dysrhythmia. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients experience a myriad of physical, emotional and social adjustments, with little being known about the impact of age on trajectory. AIMS, OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN: Therefore the purpose of the study is to examine the effects of age on health status, quality of life, and mood states of implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients during the first year after implantation using a repeated measures design.
A comparison of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients' scores with other samples, both ill and well, are discussed to see how the two implantable cardioverter defibrillator age groups compare on the various measures. Human subjects approval was obtained from the institutional review board.
Seventy subjects, 51 males and 19 females, were recruited. There were 31 subjects between the ages of 21 and 62 years, mean age of 51 years, that comprised the younger age group, and 39 subjects between the ages of 67 and 84 years, mean age of 74 years, that comprised the older age group. Each subject completed the Medical Outcomes SF-36, the Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index, and the Profile of Moods States at time of implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, and 6 and 12 months later.
The older age group was as expected less physically active, less satisfied with their physical functioning, and had slightly more anxiety at 6 and 12 months than the younger counterparts. The younger implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients demonstrated some improvements over time in the perception of their physical adjustment and anxiety.
Comparison of the SF-36 with other populations with or without a medical condition revealed scores below norms in physical health for both groups, and only slightly higher than patients with heart failure for the older group.
植入式心脏复律除颤器显示出优于传统药物治疗的效果。对于有危及生命的心律失常风险或已经经历过危及生命的心律失常的患者,植入式心脏复律除颤器的植入频率不断增加。植入式心脏复律除颤器接受者会经历无数身体、情感和社会方面的调整,而关于年龄对其调整轨迹的影响却知之甚少。目的、目标与设计:因此,本研究的目的是采用重复测量设计,研究年龄对植入式心脏复律除颤器接受者在植入后第一年的健康状况、生活质量和情绪状态的影响。
讨论将植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的得分与其他患病和健康样本进行比较,以观察两个植入式心脏复律除颤器年龄组在各项测量指标上的比较情况。获得了机构审查委员会对人体受试者的批准。
招募了70名受试者,其中51名男性和19名女性。年龄在21至62岁之间、平均年龄为51岁的31名受试者组成了较年轻年龄组,年龄在67至84岁之间、平均年龄为74岁的39名受试者组成了较年长年龄组。每位受试者在植入式心脏复律除颤器植入时、6个月后和12个月后分别完成了医学结局研究简表36健康调查、费兰斯和鲍尔斯生活质量指数以及情绪状态量表。
正如预期的那样,较年长年龄组的身体活动较少,对其身体功能的满意度较低,并且在6个月和12个月时比年轻组略焦虑。随着时间的推移,较年轻的植入式心脏复律除颤器接受者在身体调整和焦虑的认知方面表现出一些改善。
将简表36健康调查得分与其他有或没有疾病的人群进行比较发现,两组的身体健康得分均低于正常水平,且较年长组仅略高于心力衰竭患者。