• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于唇腭裂患者治疗结果的六中心国际研究:第4部分。鼻唇外观评估。

A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance.

作者信息

Asher-McDade C, Brattström V, Dahl E, McWilliam J, Mølsted K, Plint D A, Prahl-Andersen B, Semb G, Shaw W C, The R P

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, University Dental Hospital of Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992 Sep;29(5):409-12. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0409_asciso_2.3.co_2.

DOI:10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0409_asciso_2.3.co_2
PMID:1472518
Abstract

One hundred and fifteen frontal and profile photographs of the nasolabial area of subjects with complete unilateral clefts of the lip and palate from six European centers were assessed. Four components of the nasolabial area were rated separately by a panel of judges using a five-point scale of attractiveness. The Tukey multiple comparison test showed significant differences between the centers. The relative position of the six centers in this study followed a similar pattern to their respective positions in the cephalometric and dental cast studies.

摘要

对来自六个欧洲中心的115张唇腭裂完全性单侧唇裂患者鼻唇区域的正面和侧面照片进行了评估。一组评委使用五分制吸引力量表对鼻唇区域的四个组成部分分别进行评分。Tukey多重比较检验显示各中心之间存在显著差异。本研究中六个中心的相对位置与其在头影测量和牙模研究中的各自位置遵循相似模式。

相似文献

1
A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance.一项关于唇腭裂患者治疗结果的六中心国际研究:第4部分。鼻唇外观评估。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992 Sep;29(5):409-12. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0409_asciso_2.3.co_2.
2
Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate.唇腭裂患者鼻唇外观评分方法的开发。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991 Oct;28(4):385-90; discussion 390-1. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1991_028_0385_doamfr_2.3.co_2.
3
Rating Nasolabial Aesthetics in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: Cropped Versus Full-Face Images.评估单侧唇腭裂患者的鼻唇美学:裁剪图像与全脸图像对比
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 May;55(5):747-752. doi: 10.1177/1055665617747702. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
4
The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate part 4. Nasolabial aesthetics.美国腭裂研究:一项关于单侧唇腭裂患者治疗效果的多中心研究 第4部分。鼻唇美学。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011 May;48(3):259-64. doi: 10.1597/09-186.1. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
5
The Development of the Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale: A New Rating Scale for the Assessment of Nasolabial Appearance in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.唇腭裂美学评分量表的开发:一种用于评估完全性单侧唇腭裂患者鼻唇外观的新评分量表。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017 Sep;54(5):555-561. doi: 10.1597/15-274. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
6
A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 3. Dental arch relationships.一项关于唇腭裂患者治疗结果的六中心国际研究:第3部分。牙弓关系。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992 Sep;29(5):405-8. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0405_asciso_2.3.co_2.
7
Comparison of two scoring systems in the assessment of nasolabial appearance in cleft lip and palate patients.两种评分系统在唇腭裂患者鼻唇外观评估中的比较
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Jul;25(4):1222-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000872.
8
The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance.欧洲腭裂研究:唇腭裂患者治疗结果的多中心研究。第2部分:颅面形态和鼻唇外观。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005 Jan;42(1):69-77. doi: 10.1597/02-119.2.1.
9
A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 2. Craniofacial form and soft tissue profile.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992 Sep;29(5):398-404. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0398_asciso_2.3.co_2.
10
A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: Part 1. Principles and study design.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992 Sep;29(5):393-7. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1992_029_0393_asciso_2.3.co_2.

引用本文的文献

1
Objective Severity Classification of Unilateral Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity Using Nostril Width, Alar Facial Symmetry Ratio, and Columellar Angle to Justify Surgical Outcomes.利用鼻孔宽度、鼻翼面部对称比和鼻小柱角度对单侧唇裂鼻畸形进行客观严重程度分类以证明手术效果。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05082-6.
2
Comparison of secondary surgery before and after centralisation of cleft services in the UK: a whole-island cross-sectional analysis.英国唇腭裂服务集中化前后二次手术的比较:全岛横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 13;15(8):e105396. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105396.
3
Evolution of Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery and the Pursuit for Consensus on Standardized Algorithms of Care.
唇腭裂手术的发展历程以及对标准化治疗方案达成共识的探索。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Mar 20;13(3):e6643. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006643. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
A Longitudinal Investigation of Nasolabial Changes With and Without Revision Surgery in Patients with Non-Syndromic Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.非综合征性单侧唇腭裂患者行与不行修复手术时鼻唇变化的纵向研究
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Aug;62(8):1376-1384. doi: 10.1177/10556656241256706. Epub 2024 May 30.
5
Preliminary study on reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Asher-McDade aesthetic index.《Asher-McDade 美学指数中文版信度和效度的初步研究》。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 1;42(1):97-103. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2024.2023196.
6
Patient Reported Outcome Following the Skoog Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair among Adults- a Long-Term Cohort Study and Comparison to a Non-cleft Population.成人 Skoog 单侧唇裂修复术后患者报告结局——一项长期队列研究,并与非唇裂人群进行比较。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Sep;61(9):1548-1558. doi: 10.1177/10556656231177139. Epub 2023 May 29.
7
Systematic Review of the Long-Term Effects of Presurgical Orthopedic Devices on Patient Outcomes.术前矫形装置对患者结局的长期影响的系统评价。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022 Feb;59(2):156-165. doi: 10.1177/1055665621998176. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
8
Marked Variation Exists Among Surgeons and Hospitals in the Use of Secondary Cleft Lip Surgery.外科医生和医院在二期唇裂手术的使用上存在显著差异。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 Feb;57(2):198-207. doi: 10.1177/1055665619880056. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
9
Protocols for Reporting Speech Outcomes following Palatoplasty or Velopharyngeal Surgery: A Literature Review.腭裂修复术或腭咽手术语音结果报告的方案:文献综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Feb 8;7(2):e2151. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002151. eCollection 2019 Feb.
10
Five-Fold Variation Among Surgeons and Hospitals in the Use of Secondary Palate Surgery.外科医生和医院在二级腭裂手术使用上的五倍差异。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 May;56(5):586-594. doi: 10.1177/1055665618799906. Epub 2018 Sep 24.